|
|
The Problem of Influence of Children’s Birth Order in the Family on Their Intellectual Abilities and Personality Traits 789
Lapteva N.M. Junior Research Fellow The Laboratory of Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Science (IPRAS), Moscow, Russia e-mail: n.m.lapteva@mail.ru Valueva E.A. PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, The Laboratory of the Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-287X e-mail: ekval@mail.ru Shepeleva E.A. PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Center for Applied Psychological and Pedagogical Research, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6524 e-mail: e_shep@rambler.ru
The article analyses theoretical approaches and empirical research of the influence of the children’s birth order in the family on their intellectual and creative abilities, achievements in education, personality traits, behaviors and social preferences. It is shown that the results of the studies vary depending on the method of data analysis - the effect of decreasing intelligence while increasing the birth sequence number detected when comparing indicators of large numbers of children with different birth order from different families, and generally not detectable in intra-family analysis data. To explain the differences obtained the authors used three basic theoretical models: a model of merge, the model of resource depletion and impurity model. Due to differences in birth order personality traits have more pronounced differences in the cognitive sphere. Research confirms that according to the results of the personal questionnaire «Big five» firstborns display more pronounced «honesty», and younger children-«kindness» and «openness» to experience. Individual work on features of social interaction of senior and subsequent children demonstrated a great ability of younger children to cooperation. Despite the fact that the prognostic significance of identified effects in large samples is not as great as in individual families, results may have practical significance for the pedagogical and psychological work with children.
The study is carried out with the support of RFBR grant, project № 18-013-01023 and project № 17-06-00574
- Adler A. Praktika i teoriya individual'noi psikhologii [Practice and theory
of individual psychology]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2007. 232 p. (In
Russ.).
- Zyryanova N.M. Rannie siblingovye issledovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Early
sibling studies]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies],
2008, vol. 2, no. 2, 27 p. URL:
http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2008n2-2/100-zyrianova2.html (Accessed
13.06.2019). (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
- Kh'ell L.A., Zigler D.Dzh. Teorii lichnosti [Personality theory]. Spb.:
Piter, 2007, pp. 174-182. (In Russ.).
- Barclay K., Hällsten M., Myrskylä M. Birth order and college major in
Sweden. Social Forces, 2017, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 629–660.
doi:10.1093/sf/sox069
- Black S.E., Devereux P.J., Salvanes K.G. The more the merrier? The effect
of family size and birth order on children's education. The Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 2005, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 669–700.
doi:10.1093/qje/120.2.669
- Black S.E., Grönqvist E., Öckert B. Born to lead? The effect of birth order
on noncognitive abilities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2018,
vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 274–286. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00690
- Bleske-Rechek A., Kelley J.A. Birth order and personality: A within-family
test using independent self-reports from both firstborn and laterborn siblings.
Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, vol. 56, pp. 15–18.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.011
- Bonesrønninga H., Massihb S.S. Birth order effects on young students’
academic achievement. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2011, vol. 40,
no. 6, pp. 824–832. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.010
- Cho H. Birth order and education. Evidence from a Korean cohort. Economics
Letters, 2011, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 200–202.
doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.044
- Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992. 101 p.
- Eisenman R. Creativity, birth order, and risk taking [Elektronnyi resurs].
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1987, vol. 25, no. 2,
pp. 87–88. URL:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03330292.pdf (Accessed:
13.06.2019).
- Ellis H.A. A study of British genius. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1904.
396 p.
- Ernst C., Angst J. Birth Order: Its Influence on Personality.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983. 343 p.
- Galton F. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London:
Macmillan&Co. 1874, pp. 16–75. doi:10.4324/9780429020919
- Harris J.R. Context-specific learning, personality, and birth order.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2000, vol. 9, no. 5,
pp. 174–177. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00087
- Harris J.R. Socialization, personality development, and the child's
environments: Comment on Vandell. Developmental Psychology, 2000, vol. 36,
no. 6, pp. 711–723. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.6.711
- Healeya M.D., Ellis B.J. Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to
experience Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family
methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2007, vol. 28, no. 1,
pp. 55–59. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.003
- Hertwig R., Davis N.J., Sulloway F.J. Parental investment: how an equity
motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, vol. 128,
no. 5, pp. 728–745. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.728
- Hotz V., Pantano J. Strategic Parenting, Birth Order and School
Performance. Journal of Population Economics, 2015, vol. 28, no. 4,
pp. 911–936. doi:10.1007/s00148-015-0542-3
- Boomsma D.I. et al. Intelligence and birth order in boys and girls.
Intelligence, 2008, vol. 36, pp. 630–634.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.01.005
- Deary I.J. et al. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence,
2007, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13–21.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001
- Kristensen P. et al. Intelligence test scores and birth order among young
Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families. Intelligence,
2007, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 503–514.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.01.004
- Kalimijn M., Kraaykamp G. Late or later? A sibling analysis of the effect
of maternal age on children's schooling. Social Science Research, 2005,
vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 634–650.
doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.04.008
- Kantarevic J., Mechoulan S. Birth order, educational attainment, and
earnings. The Journal of Human Resources, 2006, vol. 41, no. 4,
pp. 755–777. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.755
- Kristensen P., Bjerkedal T. Educational attainment of 25 year old
Norwegians according to birth order and gender. Intelligence, 2010,
vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 123–136.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.08.003
- Kubaa R., Flegra J., Havlíčekc J. The effect of birth order on the
probability of university enrolment. Intelligence, 2018, vol. 70,
pp. 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.08.003
- Mackintosh N.J. IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1998. 419 p.
- Marini V.A., Kurtz J.E. Birth order differences in normal personality
traits: Perspectives from within and outside the family. Personality and
Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 910–914.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.019
- Michalski R.L., Shackelford T.K. An attempted replication of the
relationships between birth order and personality. Journal of Research in
Personality, 2002, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 182–188.
doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2350
- Dixon M.M. et al. Personality and birth order in large families.
Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, vol. 44, no. 1,
pp. 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.015
- Price J. Parent-child quality time: does birth order matter? Journal of
Human Resources, 2008, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 240–265.
doi:10.3368/jhr.43.1.240
- Prime H., Plamondon A., Jenkins J.M. Birth order and preschool children’s
cooperative abilities: A within-family analysis. British Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 2017, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 392–405.
doi:10.1111/bjdp.12180
- Steelman L.C. et al. Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration:
Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 2002, vol. 28,
pp. 243–269. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.111301.093304
- Rodgers J.L. et al. Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and
intelligence. American Psychologist, 2000, vol. 55, no. 6,
pp. 599—612. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.599
- Retherford R.D., Sewell W.H. Birth order and intelligence: Further tests of
the confluence model [Elektronnyi resurs]. American Sociological Review, 1991,
vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 141–158. URL:
https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch/publications/files/public/Retherford-Sewell_Birth.Order.I.pdf
(Accessed: 13.06.2019).
- Baer M. et al. Revisiting the Birth Order–Creativity Connection: The Role
of Sibling Constellation. Creativity Research Journal, 2005, vol. 17,
no. 1, pp. 67–77. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_6
- Rodgers J.L. Are birth order effects on intelligence really Flynn Effects?
Reinterpreting Belmont and Marolla 40 years later. Intelligence, 2014,
vol. 42, pp. 128–133. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.08.004
- Rodgers J.L. What Causes Birth Order-Intelligence Patterns? The Admixture
Hypothesis, Revived. American Psychologist, 2001, vol. 56, no. 6/7,
pp. 505–510. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.56.6-7.505
- Salmon C. Birth order and relationships Family, Friends, and Sexual
Partners. Human Nature, 2003, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–88.
doi:1045-6767/03/$1.00+.10
- Salmon C.A. On the Impact of Sex and Birth Order on Contact with Kin
[Elektronnyi resurs]. Human Nature, 1999, vol. 10, no. 2,
pp. 183–197. URL:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12110-999-1014-9.pdf
(Accessed: 13.06.2019).
- Salmon C.A. The Evocative Nature of Kin Terminology in Political Rhetoric.
Politics and the Life Sciences, 1998, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51–57.
doi:10.1017/S0730938400025351
- Salmon C.A., Daly M. Birth Order on Familial Sentiment: Middleborns Are
Different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 1998, vol. 19, no. 5,
pp. 299–312. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00022-1
- Sulloway F. Born to rebel and its critics. Politics and the Life Sciences,
2000, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 181–202.
doi:10.1017/S0730938400014817
- Sulloway F. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative
Lives. New York: Pantheon, 1996. 653 p.
- Sulloway F.J. Birth Order. Reference Module in Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Psychology, 2017, pp. 149–158.
doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.06133-2
- Sulloway F.J. Birth Order and Evolutionary Psychology: A Meta-Analytic
Overview. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–80.
doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0601_15
- Sulloway F.J. Sibling-order Effects. International Encyclopedia of the
Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015, pp. 923–927.
- Sulloway F.J., Zweigenhaft R.L. Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A
meta-analysis and study of major league baseball. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 2010, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 402–416.
doi:10.1177/1088868310361241
- Wichman A.L., Rodgers J.L., MacCallum R.C. A multilevel approach to the
relationship between birth order and intelligence. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 2006, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 117–127.
doi:10.1177/0146167205279581
- Zajonc R.B., Markus H., Markus G.B. The birth order puzzle. Journal of
personality and social psychology, 1979, vol. 37, no. 8,
pp. 1325–1341. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1325
|
|