Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 9, no. 1)

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2304-4977

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2012

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Analysis of foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and methods for its evaluation 118

Gritsenko V.V.
Doctor of Psychology, Proffesor, Faculty of Social Psychology, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems of Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-5709
e-mail: gritsenko2006@yandex.ru

Khukhlaev O.E.
PhD in Psychology, Professor, Head of the Chair of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems in Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-9534
e-mail: huhlaevoe@mgppu.ru

Pavlova O.S.
PhD in Education, chair of ethnopsychology and psychological problems in multicultural education, associate professor, chair of pedagogical psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-1550
e-mail: os_pavlova@mail.ru

Tkachenko N.V.
PhD, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Issues of Multicultural Education, Associate Professor, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-8511
e-mail: tata_tkachenko@mail.ru

Usybyan Sh.A.
Postgraduate student, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Issues of Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: usubyansha@mgppu.ru

Shorokhova V.A.
Senior Lecturer, Department of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Multicultural Education, Faculty of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-2350
e-mail: shorokhovava@gmail.com

Abstract
The article presents the first part of the analytical review, which in general includes 14 foreign empirical models of intercultural competences and psychodiagnostic techniques, developed on their basis, which in foreign psychology have been tested for reliability and validity. Nine approaches to intercultural competences have been analyzed and the results of these researches are presented. The article describes the structure of subject-oriented, i.e. focused solely on the assessment of intercultural traits, intercultural relations and worldview, or intercultural possibilities, and mixed models, i.e. combining character traits, worldviews and opportunities.

Keywords: Intercultural Competence, Assessment of Intercultural Competence, Empirical Model.

Column: Social psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090111

For Reference

Funding

The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-013-00892 «Integrative socio-psychological evaluation model and predicting the effectiveness of intercultural interaction».

References
  1. Bultseva M.A., Lebedeva N.M. Vzaimosvyaz' mezhkul'turnoi kompetentnosti i kreativnosti u rossiiskikh studentov [Interrelation of intercultural competence and creativity among Russian students]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and contemporary world], 2018, no. 6, pp. 31–44. DOI:10.31857/S086904990002750-7 (In Russ.).
  2. Zakharova A.M. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti fenomena mezhkul'turnoi kompetentnosti (na primere Irkutskoi oblasti) [Socio-psychological characteristics of this phenomenon intercultural competence (the example Irkutsk area)]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem [Modern research of social problems], 2014. Vol. 11, no. 43, pp. 172–185. DOI:10.12731/2218-7405-2014-11-14 (In Russ.).
  3. Kornilova M.V. Dinamika mezhkul'turnoi kompetentnosti v mono- i polikul'turnykh gruppakh (na materiale mezhkul'turnogo treninga). Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Dynamics of intercultural competence in mono- and multicultural groups (based on intercultural training). Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.] Moscow, 2012. 308 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Kostenko N., Skokova L. Testirovanie shkaly kul'turnoi kompetentnosti (CQS): ukrainskaya auditoriya [Testing the scale of cultural competence (CQS): Ukrainian audience] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: theory, methods, marketing], 2012, no. 4, pp. 158–193. URL: https://i-soc.com.ua/assets/files/journal/sockult/2012-4-ru11.pdf (Accessed 12.03.2020). (In Russ.).
  5. Logashenko Yu.A. Mezhkul'turnaya sensitivnost' studentov v polietnicheskoi srede: Dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Intercultural Sensitivity of Students in a Multi-Ethnic Environment. Ph. D. (Psychology) diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2015. 240 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Soldatova G.U., Chigarkova S.V., Rasskazova E.I. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnoi versii rasshirennoi shkaly kul'turnogo intellekta [Approbation of Expanded Cultural Intelligence Scale in Russian]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2018. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 510–526. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-510-526 (In Russ.).
  7. Chibisova M.Yu., Ivanova T.M. Strukturnaya model' mezhkul'turnoi kompetentnosti kak osnova razrabotki ekspress-oprosnika [The structural model of intercultural competence as the basis for the development of an express questionnaire]. Teoreticheskie problemy etnicheskoi i krosskul'turnoi psikhologii: Materialy Pyatoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferenuii: g. Smolensk, 27–28 maya 2016 g. [Theoretical Problems of Ethnic and Cross-Cultural Psychology: Materials of the Fifth International Scientific Conference: Smolensk, May 27–28, 2016]. Smolensk: SGU, 2016, pp. 243–246.
  8. Bennett M.J. Becoming interculturally competent [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Wurzel J. (ed.), Towards multi" culturalism: A reader in multicultural education. Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation, 2004, pp. 62–77. URL: https://www.uua.org/sites/live-new.uua.org/files/becoming_interculturally_competent_3.pdf (Accessed 12.03.2020).
  9. Brinkmann U. Connecting intercultural learning with personal development: Insights from the Intercultural Readiness Check [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2009. 7 p. WU. Wirtschafts universität Wien. Vienna university of economics and Business URL: https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/o/iaccm/Abstracts/2009_26brinkmann.pdf (Accessed 12.03.2020).
  10. Chen G.-M., Starosta W.J. The development and validation of the Intercultural Communication Sensitivity Scale [Elektronnyi resurs]. Human Communication, 2000. Vol. 3, pp. 1–15. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6b76/b27955625acd2c7c630201819ae7c284557f.pdf (Accessed 12.03.2020).
  11. Chibisova M., Khukhlaev O. Measuring teachers’ intercultural competence: Towards a theory-based instrument. In Brown N.R. [et al.] (eds.), Book of Abstracts of the 19th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Bremen: Jacobs University, 2008. P. 237–238.
  12. Ang S. et al. Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 2007. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 335–371. DOI:10.1111 /j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
  13. Bird A. et al. Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2010. Vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 810–828. DOI:10.1108/02683941011089107
  14. Matsumoto D. et al. Development and validation of a measure of intercultural adjustment potential in Japanese sojourners: The Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2001. Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 483–510. DOI:10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00019-0
  15. Fantini A., Tirmizi A. Exploring and assessing intercultural competence [Elektronnyi resurs]: Final Report of a Research Project conducted by the Federation of The Experiment in International Living with funding support from the Center for Social Development at Washington University. St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University. 2006. 133 p. URL: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1815&context=csd_research  (Accessed 16.04.2019).
  16. Hammer M.R., Bennett M.J., Wiseman R. The Intercultural Development Inventory: A measure of intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421–443.
  17. Javidan M., Hough L., Boullough A. Conceptualizing and measuring global mindset: Development of the global mindset inventory [Elektronnyi resurs]. Glendale, AZ: Thunderbird. Global Mindset Institute, 2010. 108 p. URL: https://thunderbird.asu.edu/sites/default/files/gmitechnicalreportexecutivesummary1-1_0.pdf (Accessed 16.04.2019).
  18. Javidan M., Teagarden M.B. Conceptualizing and measuring global mindset. Advances in Global Leadership, 2011. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–39. DOI:10.1108/S1535-1203(2011)0000006005
  19. Johnson J.P., Lenartowicz T., Apud S. Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006. Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 525–543. URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400205.pdf (Accessed 16.04.2019).
  20. Matsumoto D., Hwang H.C. Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2013. Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 849–873. DOI:10.1177/0022022113492891
  21. Stevens M. et al. Measuring global leader intercultural competency: Development and validation of the Global Competencies Inventory (GCI). Advances in Global Leadership, 2014. Vol. 8, pp. 115–154. DOI:10.1108/S1535-120320140000008014
  22. Matsumoto D. et al. Unraveling the psychological correlates of intercultural adjustment potential. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2004. Vol. 28, no. 3–4, pp. 281–309. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.06.002
  23. Van der Zee K., Brinkmann U. Construct Validity Evidence for the Intercultural Readiness Check against the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2004. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 285–290. DOI:10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.283_1.x
  24. Van Der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European journal of personality, 2000. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 291–309. DOI:10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<291::AID-PER377>3.0.CO;2-6
  25. Van der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001. Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 278–288. DOI:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2320
  26. Van Dyne L., Ang S., Koh C. Development and validation of the CQS [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Van Dyne L., Ang S. (eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2008. P. 16–38. URL: http://culturalq.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Van-Dyne_Ang_Koh-Handbook-Ch-2-CQS-Scale.pdf (Accessed 16.04.2019).
  27. Shaffer M.A. et al. You can take it with you: Individual differences and expatriate effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006. Vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 109–125. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.109
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????