The analysis of foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and methods for its evaluation (Part 2) 68
Doctor of Psychology, Proffesor, Faculty of Social Psychology, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems of Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Education, chair of ethnopsychology and psychological problems in multicultural education, associate professor, chair of pedagogical psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Education, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Issues of Multicultural Education, Associate Professor, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
Specialist in educational and methodical work, Moscow state University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Professor, Head of the Chair of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems in Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
Senior, Lecturer, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Issues of Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
The article is the second analytical review about foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and psychodiagnostic methods developed on their basis, which have been tested for reliability and validity in foreign psychology. Here the analysis is presented of five approaches to intercultural competence and the results of its research. This article also describes the structure of subject-oriented, i.e. focused dominantly on the assessment of intercultural traits, or intercultural relations and worldviews, or intercultural possibilities, and mixed models, i.e. combined character traits, worldviews and possibilities. It is emphasized that the complexity of mixed models makes it possible to consider individual components of cross-cultural competence not as independent predictors of the effectiveness of cross-cultural efficiency, but in their relationship. This raises the question of the ratio of these components, their mutual conditionality and impact on each other and on intercultural competence in general, which has not yet been properly answered in science and whose resolution represents a promising direction for future research in this area.
- Gritsenko V.V. et al. Analysis of foreign empirical models of intercultural
competence and methods for its evaluation [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia
zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020.
Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 103–113. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2020090111. (In Russ.,
аbstr. in Engl.)
- Abe H., Wiseman R. A Cross-cultural Confirmation of the Dimensions of
Intercultural Effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 1983. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–67.
- Arasaratnam L.A. Sensation seeking and international students’ satisfaction
of experiences in the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication
Research, 2005. Vol. 34, pp. 184–194.
- Arasaratnam L.A. The development of a new instrument of intercultural
communication competence [Elektronnyiresurs]. Journal of Intercultural
Communication,2009. Vol. 20, pp. 2–21. URL:
- Arasaratnam L.A., Doerfel M.L. Intercultural communication competence:
Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International
Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005. Vol. 29, no. 2,
pp. 137–163. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.04.001
- Bolten J. Was heißt Interkulturelle Kompetenz? Perspektiven für die
internationale Personalentwicklung. [Whatdoesinterculturalcompetencemean?
Perspectivesfor international personneldevelopment]. In Künzer V.,
Berninghausen J. (eds.),Wirtschaft als interkulturelle Herausforderung.
Frankfurt/M.: IKO-Verlag,2007, pp. 21–42.
Chen L. Cognitive complexity, situational influences, and topic selection in
intracultural and intercultural dyadic interactions. Communication
Reports, 1996. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
- Cui G., Awa N.E. Measuring Intercultural Effectiveness: An Integrative
Approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1992.
Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 311–328. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(92)90055-Y
- Ang S. et al. Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on
cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task
performance. Management and Organization Review, 2007. Vol. 3,
no. 3, pp. 335–371. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
- Bird A. et al. Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for
global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2010. Vol. 25,
no. 8, pp. 810–828. DOI:10.1108/02683941011089107
- Matsumoto D. et al. Development and validation of a measure of
intercultural adjustment potential in Japanese sojourners: The Intercultural
Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS).International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 2001. Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 483–510.
- Dollwet M., Reichard R. Assessing cross-cultural skills: validation of a
new measure of cross-cultural psychological capital. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 2014. Vol. 25, no. 12,
pp. 1669–1696. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.845239
- Schnabel D.B.L. et al. Examining psychometric properties, measurement
invariance, and construct validity of a short version of the Test to Measure
Intercultural Competence (TMIC-S) in Germany and Brazil. International
Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015. Vol. 49, pp. 137–155.
- Hammer M.R., Bennett M.J., Wiseman R. Measuring intercultural sensitivity:
The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of
Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421–443.
- Imahori T.T., Lanigan M.L. Relational model of intercultural communication
competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1989.
Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 269–286.
- Javidan M., Teagarden M.B. Conceptualizing and measuring global mindset.
Advances in Global Leadership, 2011. Vol. 6, pp. 13–39.
- Koester J., Olebe M. The behavioral assessment scale for intercultural
communication effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 1988. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 233–246.
- Schnabel D.B.L. et al. Konstruktion und Validierung eines multimethodalen
berufsbezogenen Tests zur Messung interkultureller Kompetenz [Development and
validation of a job-related multimethod test to measure intercultural
competence].Diagnostica, 2014. Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 3–21.
- Leung K., Ang S., Tan M.L. Intercultural Competence. Annual Review of
Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014. Vol. 1,
pp. 489–519. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229
- Lloyd S., Härtel C. Intercultural competencies for culturally diverse work
teams.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2010. Vol. 25, no. 8,
pp. 845–875. DOI:10.1108/02683941011089125
- Matveev A.V., Nelson P.E. Cross cultural communication competence and
multicultural team performance: Perceptions of American and Russian managers.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2004. Vol. 4,
no. 2, pp. 253–270. DOI:10.1177/1470595804044752
- Luthans F. et al. Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and
Relationship With Performance and Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology,
2007. Vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 541–572.
- Ruben B.D., Kealey D. Behavioral assessment of communication competency and
the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of
Intercultural Relations, 1979. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–47.
- Rubin R.B., Martin M.M. Development of a measure of interpersonal
communication competence. Communication Research Reports,1994.
Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–44. DOI:10.1080/08824099409359938
- Van Der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality
Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness.
European journal of personality, 2000. Vol. 14, no. 4,
pp. 291–309. DOI:10.1002/1099-0984
- Van der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality
Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of
multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001.
Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 278–288. DOI:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2320
- Shaffer M.A. et al. You can take it with you: Individual differences and
expatriate effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006.
Vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 109–125. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.109