Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
RUSSIANENGLISH
Вход
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 9, no. 4)

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2304-4977

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2012

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

  

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2020. Vol. 9, no. 3, 108–117
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2020090310
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

The analysis of foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and methods for its evaluation (Part 2) 98

|

Gritsenko V.V.
Doctor of Psychology, Proffesor of the Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems of Multicultural Education, Faculty of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-5709
e-mail: gritsenko2006@yandex.ru

Pavlova O.S.
PhD in Education, chair of ethnopsychology and psychological problems in multicultural education, associate professor, chair of pedagogical psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-1550
e-mail: os_pavlova@mail.ru

Tkachenko N.V.
PhD in Education, Department of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Issues of Multicultural Education, Associate Professor, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-8511
e-mail: tata_tkachenko@mail.ru

Usybyan S.A.
UMR Specialist of the International Relations Department of MSPPU, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4427-6677
e-mail: usubyansha@mgppu.ru

Khukhlaev O.E.
PhD in Psychology, Professor, Head of the Chair of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems in Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-9534
e-mail: huhlaevoe@mgppu.ru

Shorokhova V.A.
Senior Lecturer, Department of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Multicultural Education, Faculty of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-2350
e-mail: shorokhovava@gmail.com

Abstract
The article is the second analytical review about foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and psychodiagnostic methods developed on their basis, which have been tested for reliability and validity in foreign psychology. Here the analysis is presented of five approaches to intercultural competence and the results of its research. This article also describes the structure of subject-oriented, i.e. focused dominantly on the assessment of intercultural traits, or intercultural relations and worldviews, or intercultural possibilities, and mixed models, i.e. combined character traits, worldviews and possibilities. It is emphasized that the complexity of mixed models makes it possible to consider individual components of cross-cultural competence not as independent predictors of the effectiveness of cross-cultural efficiency, but in their relationship. This raises the question of the ratio of these components, their mutual conditionality and impact on each other and on intercultural competence in general, which has not yet been properly answered in science and whose resolution represents a promising direction for future research in this area.

Keywords: experience in activity, quality of motivation, theory of self-determination, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, academic motivation

Column: Social psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090310

For Reference

References
  1. Gritsenko V.V. et al. Analysis of foreign empirical models of intercultural competence and methods for its evaluation [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 103–113. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2020090111. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  2. Abe H., Wiseman R. A Cross-cultural Confirmation of the Dimensions of Intercultural Effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1983. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–67. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(83)90005-6
  3. Arasaratnam L.A. Sensation seeking and international students’ satisfaction of experiences in the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 2005. Vol. 34, pp. 184–194.
  4. Arasaratnam L.A. The development of a new instrument of intercultural communication competence [Elektronnyiresurs]. Journal of Intercultural Communication,2009. Vol. 20, pp. 2–21. URL: http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr20/arasaratnam.htm (Accessed 07.09.2020).
  5. Arasaratnam L.A., Doerfel M.L. Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 137–163. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.04.001
  6. Bolten J. Was heißt Interkulturelle Kompetenz? Perspektiven für die internationale Personalentwicklung. [Whatdoesinterculturalcompetencemean? Perspectivesfor international personneldevelopment]. In Künzer V., Berninghausen J. (eds.),Wirtschaft als interkulturelle Herausforderung. Frankfurt/M.: IKO-Verlag,2007, pp. 21–42.
  7. 7.                  Chen L. Cognitive complexity, situational influences, and topic selection in intracultural and intercultural dyadic interactions. Communication Reports, 1996. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1080/08934219609367630
  8. Cui G., Awa N.E. Measuring Intercultural Effectiveness: An Integrative Approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1992. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 311–328. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(92)90055-Y
  9. Ang S. et al. Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 2007. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 335–371. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
  10. Bird A. et al. Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2010. Vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 810–828. DOI:10.1108/02683941011089107
  11. Matsumoto D. et al. Development and validation of a measure of intercultural adjustment potential in Japanese sojourners: The Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS).International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2001. Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 483–510. DOI:10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00019-0
  12. Dollwet M., Reichard R. Assessing cross-cultural skills: validation of a new measure of cross-cultural psychological capital. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2014. Vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1669–1696. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.845239
  13. Schnabel D.B.L. et al. Examining psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of a short version of the Test to Measure Intercultural Competence (TMIC-S) in Germany and Brazil. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015. Vol. 49, pp. 137–155. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.08.002
  14. Hammer M.R., Bennett M.J., Wiseman R. Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2003. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421–443. DOI:10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
  15. Imahori T.T., Lanigan M.L. Relational model of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1989. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 269–286. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(89)90013-8
  16. Javidan M., Teagarden M.B. Conceptualizing and measuring global mindset. Advances in Global Leadership, 2011. Vol. 6, pp. 13–39. DOI:10.1108/S1535-1203(2011)0000006005
  17. Koester J., Olebe M. The behavioral assessment scale for intercultural communication effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1988. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 233–246. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(88)90017-X
  18. Schnabel D.B.L. et al. Konstruktion und Validierung eines multimethodalen berufsbezogenen Tests zur Messung interkultureller Kompetenz [Development and validation of a job-related multimethod test to measure intercultural competence].Diagnostica, 2014. Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 3–21. DOI:10.1026/0012-1924/a000110
  19. Leung K., Ang S., Tan M.L. Intercultural Competence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014. Vol. 1, pp. 489–519. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229
  20. Lloyd S., Härtel C. Intercultural competencies for culturally diverse work teams.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2010. Vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 845–875. DOI:10.1108/02683941011089125
  21. Matveev A.V., Nelson P.E. Cross cultural communication competence and multicultural team performance: Perceptions of American and Russian managers. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2004. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 253–270. DOI:10.1177/1470595804044752
  22. Luthans F. et al. Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship With Performance and Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 2007. Vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 541–572. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
  23. Ruben B.D., Kealey D. Behavioral assessment of communication competency and the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1979. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–47. DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(79)90045-2
  24. Rubin R.B., Martin M.M. Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Research Reports,1994. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–44. DOI:10.1080/08824099409359938
  25. Van Der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European journal of personality, 2000. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 291–309. DOI:10.1002/1099-0984
  26. Van der Zee K.I., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001. Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 278–288. DOI:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2320
  27. Shaffer M.A. et al. You can take it with you: Individual differences and expatriate effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006. Vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 109–125. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.109
  
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

 RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????