Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2021. Vol. 10, no. 3, 8–20
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2021100301
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Contemporary realities of communication ethics in the educational space

331

Т.V. Ermolova, A.V. Litvinov, N.V. Savitskaya, O.A. Krukovskaya

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article discusses the current ideas of the foreign scientific school about the specificity of the ethical filling of the educational space in conditions of multiple uncertainty. The destructive factors of modern times, including the pandemic, have created a living environment of increased moral and ethical complexity and new challenges to the education system. Ethical changes in the educational space, both traditionally present and new, lead to a decrease in the quality of education, dehumanizing and dissocializing the student who finds himself in impelled isolation. The working hypothesis of the review is that the spatial separation of participants in the educational process is especially dangerous for the ethical integrity of the educational environment. The problems of ethical deficits of the teacher and the student are deduced: bullying, destructive leadership, academic dishonesty (cheating). The article regards several conditions for creating an ethically normalized learning process that might appear helpful in distance learning of students and regular utilization of social networks.

General Information

Keywords: violation of ethics, educational space, distance learning, social networks, academic dishonesty, destructive leadership, bullying, contextuality

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology and Pedagogical Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100301

For citation: Ermolova Т.V., Litvinov A.V., Savitskaya N.V., Krukovskaya O.A. Contemporary realities of communication ethics in the educational space [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 8–20. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100301. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. «Vozvrashcheniya ne budet»: kak pandemiya izmenila nashu psikhologiyu ["There will be no return": how the pandemic changed our psychology] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ideonomika: [kanal pol'zovatelya Yandeks Dzen] [Ideonomics: Yandex Zen user channel]. 2021. URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/ideanomics/vozvrasceniia-ne-budet-kak-pandemiia-izmenila-nashu-psihologiiu-6011a0252ff89f235777b4bd (Accessed 09.09.2021). (In Russ.).
  2. Molchanov S.V., Almazova O.V., Poskrebysheva N.N. Moral'nye suzhdeniya podrostkov s raznym urovnem psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya [Moral Judgments in Adolescents with Different Levels of Psychological Well-Being]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 22–35. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240402 (In Russ.).
  3. Protasova I.N., Sychev O.A., Anoshkin I.V. Tsennostnye i moral'nye osnovy pravovogo nigilizma molodezhi [Values-related and Moral Foundations of legal Nihilism of Youth]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 158–173. DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2020100311 (In Russ.).
  4. Jiménez T.I. et al. Academic Competence, Teacher–Student Relationship, and Violence and Victimisation in Adolescents: The Classroom Climate as a Mediator. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 3, article ID 1163, 16 p. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031163
  5. Barak M., Green G. Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2021. Vol. 27, no. 8, article ID 8, 24 p. DOI:10.1007/s11948-021-00280-2
  6. Camas G. L., Moya V.A., Morancho V.M. The Teacher-Student Relationship in the Use of Social Network Sites for Educational Purposes: A Systematic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137–156. DOI:10.7821/naer.2021.1.591
  7. Dawson A., DennisS .Workplace Intimacy. Anthropology in Action, 2021. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–7. DOI:10.3167/aia.2021.280101
  8. Sari R.C. et al. Does behavior simulation based on augmented reality improve moral imagination? Education and Information Technologies, 2021. Vol. 26, pp. 441–463. DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10263-8
  9. Eshet Y., Steinberger P., Grinautsky K. Relationship between Statistics Anxiety and Academic Dishonesty: A Comparison between Learning Environments in Social Sciences. Sustainability, 2021. Vol. 13, no. 3, article ID 1564, 18 p. DOI:10.3390/su13031564
  10. Michl S. et al. Ethics in times of physical distancing: virtual training of ethical competences. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 2021. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–6. DOI:10.3205/zma001424
  11. Falla D., Ortega-Ruiz R., Romera E.M. Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Transition from Cybergossip to Cyberaggression: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. Vol. 18. article ID 1000, 12 p. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031000
  12. Farland Michelle Z., Childs-Kean Lindsey M. Stop tempting your students to cheat. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2021. Vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 588–590. DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.035
  13. Griffin D. J., Laningham A.J., NittingerJ. Will they steal? Exploring ethics via an academic unsurveilled self-service checkout. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 2021. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI:10.1080/15378020.2020.1814085
  14. Zhang C. et al. How does creativity influence dishonest behavior? An empirical study of Chinese students. Ethics & Behavior, 2021. 15 p. DOI:10.1080/10508422.2020.1869552
  15. Klein J., Bentolila A. Principals bully teachers at schools: causes, examples, and consequences. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2019. Vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 651–669. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2018.1518540
  16. Lee J.J., Mccabe J.M. Who speaks and who listens. Revisiting the Chilly Climate in College Classrooms. Gender & Society, 2021. Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 32–60. DOI:10.1177/0891243220977141
  17. Soler-Costa R. et al. Netiquette: Ethic, Education, and Behavior on Internet — A Systematic Literature Review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 3, article ID 1212, 15 p. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031212
  18. Rahmat M., Yahya M.W. How to improve the honesty of students in Indonesia? Sufism-islamic education model as an alternative. International Journal of Educationand Practice, 2021. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 80–92. DOI:10.18488/journal.61.2021.91.80.92
  19. Elsalem L. et al. Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students’ preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2021. Vol. 62, pp. 326–333. DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054
  20. Ryan P., Odhiambo G., WilsonR. Destructive leadership in education: a transdisciplinary critical analysis of contemporary literature. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2021. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 57–83. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2019.1640892
  21. Marengo D. et al. Student-teacher conflict moderates the link between students’ social status in the classroom and involvement in bullying behaviors and exposure to peer victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 2021. Vol. 87, pp. 86–97. DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.01.005
  22. Taghadosi M., Valiee S., Aghajani M. Nursing faculty’s point of view regarding noncompliance with ethics in academic environments: a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 2021. Vol. 20, no. 15, article ID 15, 10 p. DOI:10.1186/s12912-021-00537-y
  23. Karakaya F. et al. Teachers’ Views towards the Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic in the Education Process in Turkey. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 2021. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 17–30. DOI:10.17275/per.21.27.8.2
  24. Malesky A. et al. The Effects of Peer Influence, Honor Codes, and Personality Traits on Cheating Behavior in a University Setting. Ethics & Behavior, 2021. 11 p. DOI:10.1080/10508422.2020.1869006
  25. Wald H.S., Monteverde S. COVID-19 era healthcare ethics education: Cultivating educational and moral resilience. Nursing Ethics, 2021. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 58–65. DOI:10.1177/0969733020976188

Information About the Authors

Тatiana V. Ermolova, PhD in Psychology, Head of the Chair of Foreign and Russian Philology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4260-9087, e-mail: yermolova@mail.ru

Alexander V. Litvinov, PhD in Education, professor of the chair of foreign and Russian philology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, associate professor at Foreign Languages Department at the Facultyof Economics (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-0021, e-mail: alisal01@yandex.ru

Natalia V. Savitskaya, PhD in Education, associate professor of the department of foreign and russian philology, Moscow State University of psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-5553, e-mail: n.sawa@yandex.ru

Oksana A. Krukovskaya, PhD in Education, Department of Foreign and Russian Philology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-1144, e-mail: okruk@bk.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 634
Previous month: 15
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 331
Previous month: 13
Current month: 7