Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 16, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

CrossRef

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

 

The knowledge externalisation cycle (KnEx): development of a systematic cyclic research method to guide researchers 910

Hawkins L.
Graduate Diploma of Information System Management (GDISM) Central Queensland University; Bachelor of Arts, Lecturer, Faculty of Arts, Business, Informatics and Education, Central Queensland University, Australia
e-mail: l.hawkins@cqu.edu.au

Abstract
Knowledge workers (such as group facilitators) reflect and externalise prior knowledge as a means to plan for future activities. Reflection and knowledge externalisation can be increased by engaging in reflection with other people through dialogue. Reflecting and planning in a group can assist with articulation and transference of tacit knowledge. The Knowledge Externalisation Cycle (KnEx) is developed as a method within social constructivism, to capture and communicate the complexities of knowledge within this context. The KnEx takes as its point of departure, Engeström’s expansive learning cycle (ELC), which was developed as a method for studying and transforming work activities. The original objective of the expansive learning cycle was as a means for practitioners to consider their own ways of working, with data, conceptual tools, and guidance provided by the researchers. This paper describes the contradictions identified between the original objective of the ELC (to directly assist the practitioners) and the objective of the KnEx (to create a systematic cyclic research method to be used by the researcher). This paper aims to explain the transformation of the ELC to the KnEx, and provide a detailed description of each phase within the cycle.

Keywords: expansive learning cycle, knowledge externalisation, knowledge workers, planning, methodology

Column: Issues In Cultural Activity Theory

For Reference

References
  1. Antunes P. , Ho T. The Design of a GDSS Meeting Preparation Tool // Group Decision and Negotiation,  V. 10. № 1. 2001.
  2. Boag-Munroe G. Wrestling with words and meanings: Finding a tool for analysing language in activity theory // Educational Review,  V. 56. № 2. 2004.
  3. Bødker S. Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction. In Nardi B.(Ed.). Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction. V. Cambridge, MA. 1995.
  4. Boer N. I., van Baalen P. J. and Kumar K. An activity theory approach for studying the situatedness of knowledge sharing. In 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii. 2002.
  5. Braxton J. M. Reflections on a Scholarship of Practice // Review of Higher Education,  V. 28. № 2. 2005.
  6. Chinn P. L., Kramer M. K. Theory and nursing: Integrating knowledge development. V. St. Louis. 1999.
  7. Cruz Neto G. G., Gomes A. G. and de Castro J. B. Mapping Activity Theory Diagrams into i* Organizational Models // Journal of Computer Science and Technology,  V. 5. № 2. 2005.
  8. Engeström Y. Activity theory as a framework for analysing and redesigned work // Ergonomics,  V. 43. № 7. 2000.
  9. Engeström Y. Expansive learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization // Journal of Education and Work,  V. 14. № 1. 2001.
  10. Engeström Y. Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Engeström Y., Miettinen R. and Punamäki R. L.(Ed.). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. V. Cambridge. 1999.
  11. Engeström Y. Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. V. Helsinki. 1987.
  12. Engeström Y. Learning by expanding: Ten years after (Lernen durch Expansion). V. Marburg. 1999.
  13. Engeström Y. Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels M. C., & J. V. Wertsch(Ed.). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. V. Cambridge, England. 2007.
  14. Eraut M. Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts // Studies in Higher Education,  V. 10. № 2. 1985.
  15. Fischer G. Shared understanding, informed participation, and social creativity: Objectives for the next generation of collaborative systems. In COOP’2000: Fourth International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Sophia Antipolis, France. 2000.
  16. Foot K. A. Cultural historical activity theory as practical theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict monitoring network // Communication Theory,  V. 11. № 1. 2001.
  17. Harris S. R. Supporting Learning-in-Use: Some Applications of Activity Theory to the Analysis and Design of ICT-Enabled Collaborative Work and Learning. 2007.
  18. Hasan H. A cultural-historical activity theory approach to users, usability and usefulness. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). Auckland. 2007.
  19. Hawkins L. A., Whymark G. Increasing the descriptive power of CHAT with culturally advanced notation. 2006.
  20. Helle M. Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom // Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems,  V. 12. № 1-2. 2001.
  21. Hill R., Capper P., Wilson K., Whatman R. and Wong K. Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government “practice making” // Journal of Workplace Learning,  V. 19. № 6. 2007.
  22. Jonassen D. Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. V. San Francisco, CA. 2004.
  23. Lapadat J. C. Problematizing transcription: purpose, paradigm and quality // International Journal of Social Research Methodology,  V. 3. № 3. 2000.
  24. Lipponen L., Hakkarainen K. and Paavola S. Practices end orientations of computer-supported collaborative learning. In Stribos J., Kirschner P. and MArtens R.(Ed.). Practices end orientations of computer-supported collaborative learning. V. Boston, MA. 2004.
  25. Lopez-Mesa B. Selection and use of engineering design methods using creative problem solving. 2006.
  26. Malopinsky L. V. Facilitating organisational change: The use of activity theory as a framework for social construction of strategic knowledge. 2008.
  27. Mwanza D. Mind the gap: Activity theory and design. In CSCW 2000. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2000.
  28. Mwanza D. Where theory meets practice: A case for an Activity Theory based methodology to guide computer system design. In INTERACT’ 2001: Eighth IFIP TC 13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Tokyo, Japan. 2001.
  29. Osmond J. Knowledge Use in Social Work Practice: Examining its Functional Possibilities // Journal of Social Work,  V. 6. № 3. 2006.
  30. Paavola S., Hakkarainen K. From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts - A trialogical approach to CSCL. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Rhodes, Greece. 2009.
  31. Paavola S., Lipponen L. and Hakkarainen K. Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning // Review of Educational Research,  V. 74. № 4. 2004.
  32. Patton M. Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. V. Thousand Oaks, CA., 2001.
  33. Squire K. Cultural framing of computer/video games // The International Journal of Computer Game Research,  V. 2. № 1. 2002.
  34. Stahl G. Can shared knowledge exceed the sum of its parts? In DeRidder R. V. J.(Ed.). Can shared knowledge exceed the sum of its parts? V. Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2003.
  35. Uden L. and Helo P. Designing mobile interfaces using activity theory // International Journal of Mobile Communications,  V. 6. № 5. 2008.
  36. Wainwright D. Can Sociological Research Be Qualitative, Critical and Valid? // The Qualitative Report,  V. 3. № 2. 1997.
  37. Wang Q. Student-facilitators’ roles in moderating online discussions // British Journal of Educational Technology,  V. 39. № 5. 2008.
  38. Wilson J. P. Reflecting-on-the-future: a chronological consideration of reflective practice // Reflective Practice,  V. 9. № 2. 2008.
  39. Yamagata-Lynch L. C. Confronting Analytical Dilemmas for Understanding Complex Human Interactions in Design-Based Research From a Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) Framework // Journal of the Learning Sciences,  V. 16. № 4. 2007.
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????