Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 16, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus


Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR


Presence, social presence and heterotopia: the self and the others in a multi-space 966

Ritella G.
Doctoral student in the Center for Research on Activity, Development and Learning (CRADLE), Faculty of Behavioural sciences, University of Helsinki, Master degree in Psychology of organization and communication, Helsinki, Finland

The way people percept themselves and the others during collaborative activities is changeable, being shaped also by the technologies used for communication. Some scholars used the concepts of sense of presence and social presence for understanding this issue in activities mediated by technology [18]. Other scholars refer to presence as a «basic state of consciousness: the attribution of sensation to some distal stimulus, or more broadly to some environment» [15, p. 159], both real and virtual. A problematic issue in this debate consists in understanding how presence is felt within situations in which real and virtual worlds are present at the same time and participants deal with a multi-space – an heterotopia [6] – that enables many forms of interaction and communication. A possible way to analyze it is to use the concept of activity [9] and the activity system as unit of analysis [5]. The aim of the present work is to reflect on this problem using some empirical data from a collaborative activity in which teachers from different schools work together face to face, in the school laboratory, using the educational software CoFFEE. Six sessions during which 10 teachers prepared a pedagogical scenario to be implemented in school have been filmed and qualitatively analysed. Some representative excerpts are analyzed in order to clarify some aspects related to sense of presence and social presence.

Keywords: sense of presence; heterotopias; activity theory; collaboration; qualitative analysis

Column: Issues In Cultural Activity Theory

For Reference

  1. Bateson G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University Of Chicago Press, 1972.
  2. Biocca F. The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Vol. 3, 2, 1997.
  3. Bruner J. S. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, 1986.
  4. Cole M. Cultural Psychology. A Once and Future Discipline, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
  5. Engeström Y. Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice, in: Y. Engeström et al (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, (Cambridge University Press), 377-406. 1999.
  6. Foucault M. Of other spaces, heterotopias, 1967.
  7. Goodwin C. Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ, 2003.
  8. Kirsh D. The Intelligent Use of Space // In Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 73, 1995.
  9. Kozulin A. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. In Daniels H. (Ed.). An introduction to Vygotsky. New York, 1996.
  10. Ligorio M. B., Ritella G., Chronotopes and heterotopias as conceptual tools to understand the development of a computer supported collaborative professional task. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (in press).
  11. Leont’ev A. N. Activity and consciousness. Marxist Internet archive, 1977.
  12. Loomis J. M. Distal attribution and presence // Presence Teleop Virt. Vol. 1, 1992.
  13. Mantovani G., Riva G. «Real» presence: how different ontologies generate different criteria for presence, telepresence, and virtual presence // Presence, Teleoperators, and Virtual Environments. Vol. 8, 5, 1999.
  14. Riva G. The psychology of ambient intelligence: Activity, situation and presence. In G. Riva, F. Vatalaro, F. Davide, M. Alcañiz (Eds.), Ambient intelligence: The evolution of technology, communication and cognition towards the future of the human–computer interaction. Amsterdam, 2005.
  15. Riva G. Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences // Virtual Reality. Vol. 13, 3, 2009.
  16. Riva G. et al. From intention to action: The role of presence // New Ideas in Psychology. Vol. 29, 1, 2009.
  17. Schloerb D. A quantitative measure of telepresence // Presence Teleoperator Virtual environment. Vol. 4, 1995.
  18. Sheridan T. B. Musing on telepresence and virtual presence // Presence, Teleoperators, and Virtual Environments. Vol. 1, 1992.
  19. Spinuzzi C. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA, 2003.
  20. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence // Journal of Communication. Vol. 42, 4, 1992.
  21. Vygotsky L. S. Consciousness as a problem for the psychology of behavior. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3, New York, 1997.
  22. Waterworth J. A., Waterworth E. L., Mantovani F., Riva G. On feeling (the) present: an evolutionary account of the sense of presence in physical and electronically-mediated environments // Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 17, 2010.
  23. Wertsch J. (ed) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY, 1981.

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????