Perezhivanie as a Phenomenon and a Concept: Questions on Clarification and Methodological Meditations

Veresov N.N.

doi:10.17759/chp.2016120308

Cultural-Historical Psychology - №2 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию

Scopus
Web of Science СС

Previous issue (2021. Vol. 17, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Cultural-Historical Psychology

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1816-5435

ISSN (online): 2224-8935

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2005

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

Affiliated ISCAR

RU In Russian

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2016. Vol. 12, no. 3, 129–148
doi:10.17759/chp.2016120308
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

Perezhivanie as a Phenomenon and a Concept: Questions on Clarification and Methodological Meditations ³⁴⁹⁶

Veresov N.N.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-7467
e-mail: nveresov@hotmail.com

PDF (ENG)

This paper is an attempt to show possible ways to unpack the theoretical content of the concept of perezhivanie by clarifying the place and role of this concept within cultural-historical theory and examining the connections of this concept with other concepts, principles, and laws of the theory. There is an important distinction between the two meanings of perezhivanie presented in Vygotsky’s original texts — perezhivanie as a psychological phenomena/process which can be empirically observed and studied (P1) and perezhivanie as a concept, a theoretical tool for analysis of the process of development (P2). This distinction is an important step forward in developing the generative understanding of the concept of perezhivanie within the cultural-historical theoretical framework. Perezhivanie as a concept is not about a phenomenon how the particular child interprets, understands and relates to a certain situation. Perezhivanie as a concept is not about what the particular child experiences in a particular situation. Perezhivanie as a concept has its own theoretical content within the theory. Questions on clarification and methodological meditations are in line with Vygotsky’s ideas on perezhivanie as a concept, which relates to (1) the process of development; (2) the role on social environment and (3) the laws of development.

Keywords: Perezhivanie, cultural-historical theory, social situation of development, unit of analysis, drama

Column: Concepts in Cultural-Historical Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120308

For Reference

Veresov N.N. Perezhivanie as a Phenomenon and a Concept: Questions on Clarification and Methodological Meditations. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2016. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 129–148. doi:10.17759/chp.2016120308.

Antoniadou, V. Virtual collaboration, ‘perezhivanie’ and teacher learning: a socio-cultural-historical perspective. Bellaterra Journal of teaching & learning language & literature, 2011. Vol. 4 (3), pp. 53—70.
Brennan M. Perezhivanie: What Have We Missed about Infant Care? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2014. Vol. 15, pp. 284—292.
Chen F. Parents’ perezhivanie supports children’s de- velopment of emotion regulation: a holistic view. Early child development and care, 2015. Vol. 185(6), pp. 851—867.
Daniels H. Vygotsky and research. New York: Rout- ledge, 2008. 216p.
Fleer M. Theorising Play in the Early Years. Mel- bourne: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 256p.
Fleer M., Hammer M. ‘Perezhivanie’ in group settings: A cultural-historical reading of emotion regulation. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 2013. Vol. 38 (3), pp. 127—134.
Mahn H. John-Steiner V. The gift of confidence: A Vy- gotskian view of emotions. In Wells G. (eds.) Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 46—58.
Rieber R., Wollock J. Notes to the English Edition. On Vygotsky’s creative development. The Collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychol- ogy. New York: Plenum, 1997, pp. 371—390.
Smagorinsky P. Vygotsky’s stage theory: the psychol- ogy of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2011. Vol. 18, pp. 319—341.
Varshava B., Vygotsky L. Psihologicheskii slovar [Psy- chological dictionary]. Mocsow: Gosudarstvennoye Uchebno- pedagogicheskoye Publ., 1931. 67 p.
Veresov N. Duality of categories or dialectical con- cepts? Integrative psychological and social science, 2016a. Vol. 50 (2), pp. 244—256.
Veresov N. Perezhivanie in focus: methodological chal- lenges and empirical implications. In Scientific school of Vy- gotsky: traditions and innovations. The materials of international symposium. Moscow, 2016b, pp. 127—130.
Veresov N., Fleer, M. Perezhivanie as a theoretical concept for researching young children’s development. Mind, Culture and activity, 2016. (in press). doi:10.1080/10749039. 2016.1186198
Vygotsky L.S. Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psy- chology, 1929/1989. Vol. 27 (2), pp. 53—77.
Vygotsky L.S. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Pedagogika. 1982. 487 p.
Vygotsky L.S. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Vol. 4. 1984. Moscow, Pedagogika. 1984. 503 p.
Vygotsky L.S. Psihologia iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 1986. 479 p.
Vygotsky L.S. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press. 1987. 396p.
Vygotsky L.S. The problem of the environment. Valsin- er & R. Van der Veer (eds.) The Vygotsky reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 347—384.
Vygotsky L.S. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. New York: Plenum Press, 1997. 426 p.
Vygotsky L.S. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press. 1997a. 294 p.
Vygotsky L.S. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. New York: Plenum Press, 1998. 362 p.
Vygotsky L.S. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 6. New York: Plenum Press. 1999. 334 p.

PlumX