Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Psychotherapy and Ethics 1720

Vorobyeva L.I.
PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Psychological Counseling and Psychotherapy, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia

One of three structural components of psychotherapeutic discourse is analyzed on the basis of M.Fuko's philosophy. The distinction between «ethos» and "ethics” is proposed. The psychotherapy is characterized by entire space of ethos which the author defines as space of self-determination of the person. Ethos in psychotherapy forbids the objectifying relation to the person which is common in medical fields of practice, and which open thereby a possibility to a person for self- problematisating. At the same time different psychotherapy approaches do have various bases of values (ethics) because of their non-autonomy from ex-territorial discoursive fields of modern culture. Assimilation and transformation of old ethics in psychotherapeutic practice occurred by the influence of the discourse of unconscious developed by psychoanalysis.

Keywords: ethos, ethics, self-practice, values, norms

Column: Anthropology, phenomenology, culture

For Reference

  1. Bahtin M.M. K filosofii postupka // Filosofija i sociologija nauki i teh-niki. Ezhegodnik 1984-1985. M.: Nauka, 1986.
  2. Vasiljuk F.E. Kul'turno-antropologicheskie uslovija vozmozhnosti psihotera-pevticheskogo opyta // Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija, 2007, № 1, c.80-92.
  3. Vorob'jova L.I. Psihoterapija kak novaja antropologicheskaja praktika // Kul'turno-istoricheskaja Psihologija, 2008a, № 2, s.30-38.
  4. Vorob'jova L.I. Filosofija gumanitarnoj praktiki // Psihoterapija. Soznanie, Kul'tura. Trudy po konsul'tativnoj psihologii i psihoterapii. Vyp. 2. M.: MGPPU, PI RAO, 2008b.
  5. Zhizhek S. Ustrojstvo razryva. Parallaksnoe videnie. M.: Evropa, 2008.
  6. Kolpakova M.Ju. Pastyrskoe konsul'tirovanie // Psihoterapija. Soznanie, Kul'tura. Trudy po konsul'tativnoj psihologii i psihoterapii. Vyp. 2. M.: MGPPU, PI RAO, 2008.
  7. Lakan Zh. Jetika psihoanaliza. Seminary: Kniga VII (1959-60). M.: Gnozis/Logos, 2006.
  8. Nojmann Je. Glubinnaja psihologija i novaja jetika. Chelovek misticheskij. SPb.: Akademicheskij proekt, 1999.
  9. Perlz F. Opyty psihologii samopoznanija / praktikum po geshtal'tterapii/. M.: Gil'-Jestel', 1993.
  10. Rajkroft Ch. Kriticheskij slovar' psihoanaliza. SPb.: Vostochno-Evropejskij Institut Pishoanaliza, 1995.
  11. Fromm Je. Psihoanaliz i religija // Sumerki bogov. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S.143-221.
  12. Fromm Je. Revoljucija nadezhdy. Navstrechu gumanizirovannoj tehnologii // Psihoanaliz i jetika, M.: Respublika, 1993.
  13. Fromm Je. Zdorovoe obwestvo // Psihoanaliz i kul'tura. Izbrannye trudy Karen Horni i Jeriha Fromma. M.: Jurist, 1995.
  14. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub#ekta. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981-1982 uchebnom godu. SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
  15. Shmeman A., рrot. Dnevniki. 1973-1983. M.: Russkij put', 2005.
  16. Foucault M. Qu`est-ce due les Lumieres? // Dits et Ecrits. Vol. IV: 1980-1988. P., 1994.

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????