Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

The «Discursive turn» in the psychological studies of consciousness 1440

Busygina N.P.
PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543
e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru

Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the “discursive turn” in Psychology. The different varieties of discourse analysis that have been applied successfully in psychological studies are reviewed, such as “grammar analysis” of psychological concepts within the framework of L. Wittgenstein’s ideas, critical discourse analysis, the discourse analysis of J. Potter and M. Weatherall, and positional analysis. Discourse analysis is revealed as more than a method, but an original epistemological perspective, which is significantly different in its basic assumptions from the more traditional ways of interpretation in Psychology. Despite its extreme radicalisation of the constitutive function of language, discourse analysis offers a new perspective on a number of psychological issues, for instance, a qualitative approach to the cultural and symbolic resources of consciousness.

Keywords: discursive turn, discourse analysis, “grammar analysis” of psychological concepts, critical discourse analysis, positional analysis

Column: Theory and methodology

For Reference

References
  • Bart R. Smert' avtora // R. Bart. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Pojetika / per. s fr. M.: Izdatel'skaja gruppa «Progress», «Univers», 1994. S. 384–391.
  • Batler Dzh. Psihika vlasti: teorija sub#ekcii / per. s angl. Har'kov: HCGI; SPb.: Ale-tejja, 2002. 168 s.
  • Busygina N.P. Psihicheskie fenomeny i diskurs: perspektiva social'nogo konstrukcio-nizma // Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2009. № 4 (v pechati).
  • Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovanija // L. Vitgenshtejn. Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I / per. s nem. M.: «Gnozis», 1994. S. 75–319.
  • Gusserl' Je. Krizis evropejskih nauk i transcendental'naja fenomenologija: Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuju filosofiju / per. s nem. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Vladimir Dal'», 2004. 389 s.
  • Dzherdzhen K. Social'nyj konstrukcionizm: znanie i praktika: Sbornik statej / per. s angl. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 2003. 232 s.
  • Kalaja P., Hejkinen A. Atribucii v ramkah diskursivnogo podhoda: ob#jasnenie uspehov i neudach v izuchenii anglijskogo jazyka kak inostrannogo / per. A.A. Boldyrevoj, V.B. Kashkina // Jazyk, kommunikacija i social'naja sreda. Vyp. 2. Voronezh: VGTU, 2002. S. 43–72.
  • Kalmykova E.S., Chesnova I.G. Analiz narrativov pacienta: CCRT i diskurs-analiz // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 1996. № 2. S. 177–201.
  • Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologija vosprijatija / per. s fr. SPb.: «Juventa», «Nauka», 1999. 608 s.
  • Onuchin A.N. «Novaja paradigma» v social'noj psihologii // Mir psihologii. 1999. № 3. S. 90–97.
  • Riker P. Konflikt interpretacij: Ocherki o germenevtike / per. s fr. M.: «Kanon-press-C»; «Kuchkovo pole», 2002. 624 s.
  • Rutkevich A.M. Psihoanaliz. Istoki i pervye jetapy razvitija: Kurs lekcij. M.: Izda-tel'skaja gruppa INFRA-M, Forum, 1997. 352 s.
  • Fillips L., Jorgensen M.V. Diskurs-analiz: Teorija i metod / per. s angl. Har'kov: Izd-vo Gumanitarnyj Centr, 2004. 336 s.
  • Fuko M. Arheologija znanija / per. s fr. K.: Nika-Centr, 1996a. 208 s.
  • Fuko M. Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual'nosti: Raboty raznyh let / per. s fr. M.: Magisterium, 1996b. 448 s.
  • Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat': Rozhdenie tjur'my / per. s fr. M.: Ad Marginem, 1999. 480 s.
  • Fuko M. Slova i vewi: Arheologija gumanitarnyh nauk / per. s fr. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 406 s.
  • Harré R. Vtoraja kognitivnaja revoljucija / per. s angl. // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1996. Tom 17. № 2. S. 3–15.
  • Harré R. Metafizika i metodologija: nekotorye rekomendacii dlja social'no-psihologicheskogo issledovanija / per. s angl. // Social'naja psihologija: samoref-leksija marginal'nosti. M.: INION RAN, 1995. S. 74–93.
  • Jarskaja-Smirnova E.R. Sociokul'turnyj analiz netipichnosti. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratov-skogo universiteta, 1997. 272 s.
  • Angermüller J. 2005. "Qualitative" methods of social research in France: reconstructing the actor, deconstructing the subject. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 6(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-05/05-3-19-e.htm
  • Bamberg M. 1997. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History. Vol. 7. 335–342.
  • Billig M. 1986. Arguing and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown L.M. 1997. Performing femininities: listening to white working-class girls in rural Maine. Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 53(4). 683–701.
  • Davies B. and Harré R. 1991. Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Social Behavior. Vol. 20 (1). 44–63.
  • Harré R. and Gillet G. 1994. The discursive mind. London: Sage Publications.
  • Harré R., van Langenhove L. 1999. Positioning theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Jost J.T. 1995. Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development. Theory & Psychology. Vol. 5(1). 5–25.
  • Osterman A.C. and Keller-Cohen D. 1998. “Good girls go to heaven; bad girls…” learn to be good: quizzes in American and Brazilian teenage girls’ magazines. Discourse & Society. Vol. 9(4). 531–558.
  • Potter J.W. and Wetherell M. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.
  • Schegloff E.A. 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society. Vol. 8. 165–187.
  • Skinner D., Valsiner J. and Holland D. 2001. Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a nepali adolescent's narrative. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 2(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01skinneretal-e.htm
  • Strasser S. 1969. The idea of dialogical phenomenology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  • Wetherell M. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society. Vol. 9(3). 387–412.
  • Wetherell M. and Potter J. 1992. Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Williams M. 1985. Wittgenstein’s rejection of scientific psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol. 15(2). 203–223.
  • Wittgenstein L. 1980. Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wittgenstein L. 1967. Zettel. Berkeley: University of California Press.
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????