Previous issue (2019. Vol. 27, no. 4)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Psychoanalytic interpretation as research methodology 1877
Busygina N.P.
Assistant Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru
The article is concerned with particular methodological features of psychoanalytic interpretation as psychological research strategy. The main argument is that psychoanalysis tends to special cognitive attitude based on the idea of self-sufficiency of personal experience. The similar cognitive attitude is characteristic of the phe# nomenological and hermeneutic approaches. The particularities of psychoanalytic psychobiography are described and the symbolic nature of psychoanalytic language is argued. The value of incorporating more psychoanalytic interpretation into scientific psychology is discussed.
Keywords: psychoanalysis, interpretation, classical and humanitarian methodologies, experience, meaning, psychoanalytic approach in qualitative research
Column: Theory and methodology
- Busygina N.P. Fenomenologicheskij i germenevticheskij podhody v
kachestvennyh psihologicheskih issledovanijah // Kul'turnoistoricheskaja
psihologija. 2009. № 1. S. 57—65.
- Busygina N.P. Fenomenologicheskoe opisanie i interpretacija: primery
analiza dannyh v kachestvennyh psihologicheskih issledovanijah // Moskovskij
psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal (Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija).
2009. № 2. S. 52—76.
- Gusserl' Je. Fenomenologicheskaja psihologija // Gusserl' Je. Izbrannye
raboty. M.: Izdatel'skij dom “Territorija budushhego”, 2005. S. 297—340.
- Derrida Zh. Frejd i scena pis'ma // Derrida Zh. Pis'mo i razlichie / per. s
fr. D. Kralechkina. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2000. S. 319—369.
- Dorfman L.Ja. Jempiricheskaja psihologija: istoricheskie i filosofskie
predposylki. M.: Smysl, 2003.
- Kadyrov I.M. Psihoanaliticheskij seans i psihoanaliticheskie klinicheskie
fakty //Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. 2010. № 4. S. 8—32.
- Kristeva Ju. Chernoe solnce: Depressija i melanholija. M.: Kogito#Centr,
2010 / per. s
fr. D. Kralechkina.
- Lakan Zh. Obrazovanija bessoznatel'nogo. Seminary: Kniga V (1957/1958) /
per. s fr.A. Chernoglazova. M.: ITDGK “Gnozis”, Izdatel'stvo “Logos”,
2002.
- Lorencer A. Arheologija psihoanaliza: Intimnost' i social'noe stradanie /
per. s nem. A. Rutkevicha. M.: Progress-Akademija, 1996.
- Mamardashvili M.K. Ocherk sovremennoj evropejskoj filosofii. M.:
Progress-Tradicija,
Fond Meraba Mamardashvili, 2010.
- Miller Zh.A. Seminar v Barselone, posvjashhennyj lekcii Z. Frejda «Die Wege
der Symptombildung» / per. s fr. A. Chernoglazova // Moskovskij
psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal (Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija).
2004. № 3. S. 147—182.
- Miller Zh.A. (2011) Chitat' simptom / per. s fr. M. Strahova. [Jelektronnyj
resurs]. URL:
http://freudien.com/id#4/id#3/id.html
- Popper K. Predpolozhenija i oproverzhenija: Rost nauchnogo znanija / per. s
angl. M.: AST, Ermak, 2004.
- Rikjor P. Germenevtika i psihoanaliz // Rikjor P. Konflikt interpretacij.
Ocherki o germenevtike / per. s fr. I. Vdovinoj. M.: KANON-press-C, Kuchkovo
pole, 2002. S. 142—270.
- Rutkevich A.M. Psihoanaliz. Istoki i pervye jetapy razvitija: Kurs lekcij.
M.: Infra-M,
Forum, 1997.
- Rutkevich A.M. Nauchnyj status psihoanaliza // Voprosy filosofii. 2000. №
10. S. 9—14.
- Sokolova E.T. Prektivnye metody issledovanija lichnosti. M.: Izd#vo MGU,
1980.
- Sokolova E.T., Burlakova N.S. K obosnovaniju metoda dialogicheskogo analiza
sluchaja // Voprosy psihologii. 1997. № 2. S. 61—76.
- Sokolova E.T., Chechel'nickaja E.P. O metakommunikacii v processe
proektivnogo issledovanija pacientov s pogranichnymi lichnostnymi
rasstrojstvami // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 1997. № 3. S.
15—39.
- Sokolova E.T., Chechel'nickaja E.P. Psihologija narcissizma. M.: UMK
Psihologija,
2001.
- Frejd Z. Vvedenie v psihoanaliz. Lekcii 16—35 / per. s nem. SPb.: Aletejja,
2000a.
- Frejd Z. Leonardo da Vinchi. Vospominanija detstva // Frejd Z. Totem i
tabu. SPb. M.:
Olimp, AST, 1998. S. 217—278.
- Frejd Z. Nedovol'stvo kul'turoj // Frejd Z. Psihoanaliz. Religija.
Kul'tura. M.: Renessans, 1992. S. 65—134.
- Frejd Z. Tolkovanie snovidenij / per. s nem. Minsk: Popurri, 2000b.
- Fuko M. (2004) Nicshe, Frejd, Marks / per. s fr. E. Gorodeckogo.
[Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL:
http://knigo.com/f/FUKO/nfm.html
- Eco U. 1992. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge, U.K.:
Cambridge University Press.
- Freud is Widely Taught at Universities, except in the Psychology
Department. The
New York Times (2007. November 25).
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/weekinreview/25cohen.html?_r=4&ref=education&oref&oref=slogin&Frosh
- S. and Emerson P.D. 2005. Interpretation and Overinterpretation: Disputing
the Meaning of Texts. Qualitative Research Vol. 5 (3): 307—324.
- Froch S. and Young L.S. 2008. Psychoanalytic Approaches to Qualitative
Psychology. Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Ed. by C. Willig,
W. Stainton Rogers. L.: Sage: 109—126.
- Habermas J. 1987. Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge: Polity.
- Hinshelwood R.D. 2010. Psychoanalytic Research: Is Clinical Material Any
Use? Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. 24 (4): 362—379.
- Hollway W. and Jefferson T. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research Differently.
London: Sage.
- Steiner R. 1995. Hermeneutics or Hermess#Mess? International Journal of
Psychoanalysis. 76: 435—445.
- Vanheule S. 2002. Qualitative Research and Its Relation to Lacanian
Psychoanalysis. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society. 7 (2):
336—342.
- Westen D. 1999. The Scientific Status of Unconscious Processes: Is Freud
Really Dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 49: 1—30.
|
|
