Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2013. Vol. 21, no. 1, 202–227
ISSN:
2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)
Adaptation of multyafactor questionnaire empathy M.Davis 4793
Karyagina T.D.
Associate Professor, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow state University of psychology and education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: kartan18@gmail.com Budagovskaya N.A.
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia Dubrovskaya S.D.
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
This article describes the process and the results of the questionnaire adaptation of empathy American social psychologist M. Davis, which is widely used in foreign psychology, researchers recognized the most valid and reliable. Based on analysis of existing foreign and domestic psychology psychodiagnostic means for studying empathy concluded that the multi-factor approach to the measurement of empathy, justify M. Davis, best matches the currently prevailing ideas about its structure. Adaptation procedure is described in detail, demonstrate reliability and construct validity of the test, and presents the results of research conducted with its use.
Keywords: measurement of empathy, reliability test, the validity of the test, empathy, decentering, empathic caring, fantasy
Column: Method
-
Breslav G.M. Psihologija jemocij. M.: “Smysl”, 2007.
-
Bojko V.V. Jenergija jemocij v obshhenii: vzgljad na sebja
i na drugih. M.: “Filin”, 1996.
-
Borisenko S.B. Metody formirovanija i diagnostiki jempatii
uchitelej: Avtoref. diss. …kand.psihol.nauk. L.: LGU, 1988.
-
Burlachuk L.F. Psihodiagnostika: Uchebnik dlja vuzov.
SPb.: Piter, 2006.
-
Budagovskaja N.A. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika
jempatii M. Djevisa: analiz faktornoj struktury. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU,
2011.
-
Vasiljuk F.E. Urovni postroenija perezhivanija
i metody psihologicheskoj nauki // Voprosy psihologii. 1988. № 5. S.
27—37.
-
Gavrilova T.P. Ponjatie jempatii v zarubezhnoj psihologii
// Voprosy psihologii. 1975. № 2. S. 147—158.
-
Gavrilova T.P. Jempatija i ee osobennosti u detej
mladshego i srednego shkol'nogo vozrasta. Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. M.,
1977.
-
Demidova L.Ju. Ponimanie jemocional'nyh sostojanij licami,
sovershivshimi seksuA al'nye dejstvija v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih
// Tezisy vserossijskoj nauchnoA prakticheskoj konferencii
«Psihicheskoe zdorov'e naselenija kak osnova nacional'noj
bezopasnosti Rossii» (Pod red. N.G. Neznanova, K.K. Jahina). SPb., 2012.
S. 288—289.
-
Dubrovskaja S.V. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika
jempatii M. Djevisa: konstruktnaja validnost'. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU,
2011.
-
Ivanova A.V. Izmenenie struktury jempaticheskih
sposobnostej v processe obuchenija psihologovAkonsul'tantov. Kursovaja
rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2012.
-
Karjagina T.D. Filosofskie i nauchnye konteksty problemy
jempatii // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 2009. № 4. S.
50—74.
-
Korotkova N.E. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika
jempatii M. Djevisa: osnovnye psihometricheskie pokazateli. Diplomnaja rabota.
M.: MGPPU, 2011.
-
Ljusin D.V. Oprosnik na jemocional'nyj intellekt JemIn:
novye psihometricheskie danA nye // Social'nyj i jemocional'nyj intellekt /
pod. red. D.V. Ljusina, D.V. Ushakova. M.: IP RAN, 2009. S. 264—278.
-
Makejkina A.A. Intellektual'nye i lichnostnye predposylki
vybora v situacii kommunikativnoj neopredelennosti. Diplomnaja rabota. М.:
MGPPU, 2011.
-
Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody
psihologicheskogo issledovanija. Analiz i interpretacija dannyh.
Spb.: Rech', 2012.
-
Pankova M.V. Osobennosti jempatii bol'nyh nevrozami. Diss.
… kand. psihol. nauk. SPb.., 2003. Sardzhveladze N.I. O balanse proekcii i
introekcii v processe jempaticheskogo vzaimodeA jstvija // Bessoznatel'noe:
priroda, funkcii, metody issledovanija: V 4 t. (Pod obshh. red. A.S.
Prangishvili, A.E. Sherozija, F.V. Bassina) T. 3. Tbilisi, 1978. S.
485—490.
-
Sopikov A.P. Jeksperimental'naja metodika dlja
issledovanija jempatii k oshhushheniA jam partnera po obshheniju // Voprosy
psihologii poznanija ljud'mi drug druga i obshhenija. Krasnodar, 1978. S.
52—63.
-
Hazova M.V. Vzaimosvjaz' jempatii i
gumanisticheskih cennostej u predstavitelej pomogajushhih
professij. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2012.
-
Shishljannikova L.M. Matematicheskoe soprovozhdenie
nauchnoj raboty s pomoshh'ju statisticheskogo paketa SPSS for Windows 11.5.0.
UchebnoAmetodicheskoe posoA bie M., 2005.
-
Jusupov I.M. Psihologija jempatii. Diss. … dAra psihol.
nauk. SPb., 1997.
-
Davis M. A multidimensional approach to individual
differences in empathy.// JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,
1980, 10, 85.
-
Davis M.H., Conklin L., Smith A., & Luce C. (1996).
Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of
persons: a merging of self and other. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 4, 713—726.
-
Davis M.H. Empathy: A social psychological approach.
Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.
-
Davis M. Measuring individual differences in empathy:
Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology. 1983, 44, р. 113—126.
-
Davis M.H. The effects of dispositional empathy on
emotional reactions and helping: a multidimensional approach. Journal of
Personality, 1983, vol. 52 (2), pp. 167—184. Duan Ch., Hall C. The current
state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol.43(3), Jul.
1996, pp. 261—274.
-
Hall J., Davis M., Connelly M. Dispositional empathy in
scientists and practitioner psyA chologists: group differences and relationship
to selfAreported effectiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research,
Practice, Training, Vol 37 (1), Sep 2000. pp. 45—56. Feshbach N.D.
Empathy: the formative years. Implications for clinical
practice. Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy, p.
33—59. Edited by A.C. Bozarth and L.S. Greenberg. АPA, 1997.
-
|
|
