Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2013. Vol. 21, no. 3, 179–189
2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)
Outcome Rating Scale (ORS): results of preliminary research of adaptation of Outcome rating scale in Russian language for receiving feedback from the clients regarding changes during psychological practice 6438
head of social-psychological adaptation & development of adolescents, Center "Crossroads", MSUPE , Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Center for Modern Childhood Studies, Institute of Education, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Chair of General Psychology, Chief of the Psychological Health Department, Senior researcher, Cognitive Investigation Laboratory, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
Psychologist, The Centre of Diagnostics and Counseling "Growth", Moscow, Russia
Article describes results of preliminary research of adaptation of Outcome rating scale in Russian language. The Outcome rating scale is used in psychological practice providing feedback from the clients regarding changes in different areas of life, associated with successful outcomes of counseling. This measure is a visual analog scale and is easy to use in everyday practice. Data on reliability and validity for russian sample are presented. The scale showed adequate reliability (as internal consistency and retest reliability) and signs of validity.
Keywords: psychological counseling, client, feedback measures, reliability, validity
- Lambert M.J., Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback //
Psychotherapy. 2011. № 48. P. 72–79.
- Miller S.D., Duncan B.L. The Outcome and Session Rating Scales.
Administration and scoring manual. Institute of the study of therapeutic
change. Chicago, IL, 2000.
- Bargmann S., Robinson B. The ICCE Manuals on Feedback-Informed
Treatment (FIT). Manual 2: Feedback-Informed Clinical Work: The Basics.
International Center for Clinical Excellence, 2011.
- Rosenzweig S. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of
psychotherapy. // American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1936. №6.P.
- Wampold B.E. The research evidence for common factors models: a
historically situated perspective. // The Heart and Soul of Change, Second
Edition: delivering what works in therapy // Edited by Duncan B.L., Miller
S.D., Wampold B.E., Hubble M.A., Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association. 2010. P. 49–82.
- Miller S.D., Duncan, B.L., Brown J., Sparks J., Claud D. The Outcome
Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility
of a brief visual analogue measure. // Journal of Brief Therapy. 2003. №
2. P. 91–100.
- Bringhurst D.L., Watson C.W., Miller S.D., Duncan B.L. The
reliability and validity of the Outcome Rating Scale: A replication study of a
brief clinical measure. // Journal of Brief Therapy. 2006. № 5. P.
- Hafkenscheid A., Duncan B.L., Miller S.D. The Outcome and
Session Rating Scales: A cross cultural examination of the psychometric
properties of the Dutch translation. // Journal of Brief Therapy. 2010. № 7. P.
- Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.) London: