Functions and Forms of Verbality in Spiritual Practices and Practices Related to Them

Horujy S.S.

doi:10.17759/cpp.2014220503

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy - №3 / 2020 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

RU In Russian

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2014. Vol. 22, no. 5, 59–88
doi:10.17759/cpp.2014220503
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

Functions and Forms of Verbality in Spiritual Practices and Practices Related to Them ⁹¹⁰

Horujy S.S.
Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Honorary Professor of the UNESCO Chair, St. Petersburg Department of RNII, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: horuzhy@orc.ru

Full Text in Russian (PDF, 119 kb)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

RUIn Russian

Functions and forms, in which the verb is used in spiritual practices and practices related closely to them are analyzed systematically. The following classes of prac¬tices are considered: 1) Eastern-Orthodox hesychasm, 2) Hellenistic practices of the Self (practices of the Roman Stoicism, Cynism and Epicureanism) as they are interpreted by Michel Foucault, 3) Far-Eastern practices as they are represented in Zen-Buddhism. The problem of the sacred word in spiritual practice is discussed. A number of comparative observations and conclusions are obtained concerning, in particular, "hot" and "cool" practices and corresponding kinds of verbality, typolog¬ical distinctions of verbality in Eastern and Western anthropological practices, etc.

Keywords: verbality, spiritual practices, synergic anthropology, hesychasm, repen¬tance, prayer, Name-praising, inner speech, communication, practice of the self, parrhesia, spiritual exercises, Zen, satori

Column: Theology and anthropology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2014220503

For Reference

Horujy S.S. Functions and Forms of Verbality in Spiritual Practices and Practices Related to Them. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2014. Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 59–88. doi:10.17759/cpp.2014220503. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Zhivov V.M. Videniya sveta i problemyi russkogo srednevekovogo isihazma // Iero-topiya ognya i sveta v kulture vizantiyskogo mira / red.-sost. A.M. Lidov. M.: Pheorya, 2013. S. 350—367.
Zhivov V.M. Yazyik i vera // Zhivov V.M. Svetostta. Krat'k rechnik na agiografskite termini. Sofiya, 2002. S. 139—152.
Lihachev D.S. Nekotoryie zadachi izucheniya vtorogo yuzhnoslavyanskogo vliyaniya v Rossii // Issledovaniya po slavyanskomu literaturovedeniyu i folkloristike. Doklady sovetskih uchenyih na IV Mezhdunarodnom s'ezde slavistov. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1960. S. 95—151.
Sofroniy (Saharov), arhim. Videt’ Boga kak On est. Esseks: Sv.-Ioanno-Predtecheskiy monastyr, 1985.
Fuko M. Germenevtika sub'ekta: Kurs lektsiy, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981—1982 uchebnom godu / per. s fr. A.G. Pogoniaylo. SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
Fuko M. Upravlenie soboy i drugimi: Kurs lektsiy, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1982—1983 uchebnom godu / per. s fr. A.V. Dyakova. SPb.: Nauka, 2011.
Horujy S.S. Vizualnyiy opyit i prostranstvennyiy opyit v praktike isihazma // Fonar Diogena. Proekt sinergiynoy antropologii v sovremennom gumanitarnom kontekste / otv. red. S.S. Horujy. M.: Progress-Tradiciya, 2010. S. 387—431.
Horujy S.S. K fenomenologii askezyi. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literaturyi, 1998.
Foucault М. Usage des plaisirs et techniques de soi // Foucault М. Dits et ecrits II, 1976—1988. Paris, Gallimard, 2001. P. 1358—1380.

PlumX