Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Mentalization and empathy ontogenetic development: empirical studies review 2260
Klimenkova E.N.
Psychologist, school psychologist, the structural subdivision "Sevastopol", State professional educational establishment Complex «South-West», Moscow, Russia
e-mail: klimenkovaliza@gmail.com
The article considers the main fields and onotogenetic development processes of men- talization and empathy. The neural measures and psychological studies results show that there is an active formation process of mentalization and empathy in adolescence. The article highlights the disputable character of the results of modern studies of social cognition in adolescence. The neural measures require further interpretation. The differences in mechanisms of empathy and mentalization are discussed, specifically the order of empathy components (cognitive or emotionally) forming in the onotogenetic development process. The various results of studies showing the proximity of these processes and prove their relative independence (including at the level of neural networks). The article contains the evidence that strong mentalization reduces the risk of emotional maladjustment and aggressive behavior, while its deficits correlate with bullying. We consider the current study of mentalization and empathy family factors. Particular attention is paid to the E.Mains study, which summarizes the research of social cognition ontogenetic development factors in building on the cultural and historical theory development of the of the psyche L.S. Vygotsky.
The study was performed by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (grant № 14- 18-03461) at the Federal Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Narcology under the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation.
- Zaretskii V.K., Smirnova N.S., Zaretskii Yu.V., Evlashkina N.M.,
Kholmogorova A.B. Tri glavnye problemy podrostkov s deviantnym povedeniem.
Pochemu vozni- kayut? Kak pomoch’? [Deviant behavior adolescents three main
problems. Why this problems occurs? How can we help?] Moscow: Forum, 2014. 208
p.
- Karyagina T.D., Budagovskaya N.A., Dubrovskaya S.V. Adaptatsiya
mnogofaktor- nogo oprosnika empatii M. Devisa [Adaptation of multifactor
questionnaire empa- thy M. Davis]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i
psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013. no
1, pp. 202—227. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
- Kholmogorova A.B. Priroda narushenii sotsial’nogo poznaniya pri
psikhicheskoi patologii: kak primirit’ «bio» i «sotsio»? [The nature of the
social cognition viola- tions in mental disorders: how to reconcile biological
and social?]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya
[Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2014. Vol. 22, no
4, pp. 8—29. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
- Kholmogorova A.B. Rol’ idei L.S. Vygotskogo dlya stanovleniya paradigmy
sotsial’nogo poznaniya v sovremennoi psikhologii: obzor zarubezhnykh
issledovanii i obsuzhdenie perspektiv [The Role of L.S. Vygotsky’s Ideas in the
Development of Social Cognition Paradigm in Modern Psychology: A Review of
Foreign Research and Discussion on Per- spectives].
Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical
Psychology], 2015. Vol. 11, no 3, pp. 25—43. doi:
10.17759/chp.2015110304. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
- Cotler T.B. The Relationship Among Attachment Patterns, Mentalization, and
Em- pathy. Dr. Sci. (Philosophy) diss. Adelphi, 2012. 231 p.
- De Vignemont F., Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why?
Trends in Cog- nitive Sciences, 2006. Vol. 10, no. 10. pp.
435—441. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
- de Wied M., Branje S.J.T., Meeus H.J.W. Empathy and conflict resolution in
friend- ship relations among adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 2007.
Vol. 33 (1). pp. 48—55. doi: 10.1002/ab.20166
- Dinić M.B., Kodžopeljić S.J., Sokolovska T.V., Milovanović Z.I. Empathy and
peer violence among adolescents: Moderation effect of gender. School
Psychology Inter- national, 2016. Vol. 37(4), pp. 359—377.
- Dunn J., Brown J., Beardsall L. Family Talk About Feeling States and
children`s Lat- er Understanding of Other`s Emotions. Developmental
Psychology, 1991. Vol. 27 (3), pp. 448—455. doi:
org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.448
- Eisenberg N., Zhou Q., Spinrad T.L., Valiente C., Fabes R.A., Liew J. Rela-
tions Among Positive Parenting, Children’s Effortful Control, and
Externalizing
- Problems: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 2005.
Vol. 76, pp. 1055—1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00897.x
- Ferreira-Valente A., Monteiro J.S., Barbosa R.M. et al. Clarifying changes
in student empathy throughout medical school: a scoping review. Advances in
health sciences education: theory and practice, 2016, pp. 1—21. doi:
10.1007/s10459-016-9704-7
- Feshach N. Empathy training: a field study in affective education.
New York: Prae- ger, 1979. 36 p.
- Fonagy P., Steele M., Steele H., Moran G.S., Higgitt A.C. The capacity for
under- standingmentalstates:
Thereflectiveselfinparentandchildanditssignificanceforse- curity of attachment.
Infant Mental Health Journal, 1991. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 201—218.
doi:
10.1002/1097-0355(199123)12:3<201::AID-IMHJ2280120307>3.0.CO;2-7
- Garlick D. Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence:
the role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory
mechanism. Psychologi- cal Review, 2002.Vol. 109, no. 1, pp.
116—36.
- Hoffman M.L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and
jus- tice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 331 p.
- Jensen A. The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Publishing, 1998. 700 p.
- Kanske P., Bockler A., Trautwein1 F.-M. et al. Are strong empathizers
better men- talizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the
routes of social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
2016. Vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1—10.
- Kilford E.J., Garrett E., Blakemore S.J. The development of social
cognition in ad- olescence: An integrated perspective. Neuroscience and
biobehavioral reviews, 2016. Vol. 70, pp. 106—120. doi:
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.016
- Meins E. Security of attachment and the social development of cognition.
Hove: Psychology Press, 1997. 177 p.
- Sebastian C.L. Social cognition in adolescence: Social rejection and theory
of mind. Psicología Educativa. 2015. Vol. 21. no. 2. pp.
125—131.
- Sutton J. ToM goes to school: social cognition and social values in
bulling. Repa- choli B., Slaughter V. (Eds.). Individual differences in
theory of mind: implications for typical and atypical development. New
York: Psychology Press, 2003. pp. 99—120.
- Taubner S., White L.O., Zimmermann J., Fonagy P., Nolte T.
Attachment-related mentalization moderates the relationship between
psychopathic traits and proactive aggression in adolescence. Journal of
abnormal child psychology, 2013. Vol. 41 (6), pp. 929—938. doi:
10.1007/s10802-013-9736-x
- Van Lissa C.J., Hawk S.T., de Wied M. et al. The Longitudinal Interplay of
Affective and Cognitive Empathy Within and Between Adolescents and Mother.
Developmen- tal Psychology, 2013. Vol. 50 (4), pp. 1219—1225.
doi: 10.1037/a0035050
- Van Lissa C.J., Skyler T.H., Susan B., Koot H.M., Wim H.J. Common and
unique associations of adolescents’ affective and cognitive empathy development
with con- flict behavior towards parents. Journal of Adolescence, 2016.
Vol. 47, pp. 60—70. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.12.005
- Vetter N.C., Leipold K., Kliegel M., Phillips L.H., Altgassen M. Ongoing
develop- ment of social cognition in adolescence. Child neuropsychology: a
journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence,
2013. Vol. 19 (6), pp. 615— 629. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2012.718324
|
|
