The Topography of the Subject Field of Christian Psychology

Vasilyuk F.E.

doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240505

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy - №3 / 2020 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

RU In Russian

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2016. Vol. 24, no. 5, 72–99
doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240505
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

The Topography of the Subject Field of Christian Psychology ⁷⁷⁹

Vasilyuk F.E.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: pfc@list.ru

Full Text in Russian (PDF, 233 kb)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

RUIn Russian

The task of constitutionalization of Christian psychology as a specific discipline pre- sumes methodological enumeration of its population: scientific, educational and practice-oriented projects. Current article presents a tryout of a tool, that allows to to- pographically link each project to certain coordinates on a map of Christian psychology subject field. Analyses revealed uncommon qualities of such a map. The main of these qualities is a topological plasticity, a capacity to adaptively change the metric of zones and fields in order to insert specific project unaltered. Such a procedure allows to describe an individual “methodological profile” of a project. The technology of analyses tested in current work opens up an opportunity for methodological arrange- ment of the subject-thematical field of Christian psychology, which is a necessary condition for its constitutionalization and entering a “critical” phase of its development.

Keywords: Christian psychology, map of subject field, an individual methodological profile of a project, passion, soul, psyche

Column: Christian psychology and psychotherapy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2016240505

For Reference

Vasilyuk F.E. The Topography of the Subject Field of Christian Psychology. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2016. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 72–99. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240505. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

The research has been supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Humanities (project № 15-06-10889 “Synergic-Phenomenological Approach in the Counseling Psychology”).

Avdeev D.A. Depressiia kak strast’. Depressiia kak bolezn’. Moscow: Publ. Russkii khro- nograf. 2001. 63 p.
Bratus’ B.S. “Psikhika“ i “lichnost’“ v otsutstvii “dushi“ i “dukha“. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2014. № 5. P. 118—138.
Varnava Belyayev, yep. Osnovy iskusstva svyatosti: Opyt izlozheniya pravoslavnoy aske- tiki: v 5 t. T. 3: "Dushevnyy chelovek" v bor'be so strastyami. Nizhniy Novgorod: Publ. Bratstvо vo imya sv. knyazya Aleksandra Nevskogo, 1997. 539 р.
Vasiliuk F.E. Khristianskiia psikhologiia: “istoriia“ i “geografiia“. Stat’ia 1. Opyt peri- odizatsii. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2015. № 5. P. 49—63.
Vasiliuk F.E. Khristianskaia psikhologiia: “istoriia“ i “geografiia“. Stat’ia 2. Raz- metka prostranstva. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2015a. № 5. P. 64—90.
Gavrilova T.P. Priroda perezhivaniia gneva v nauchno-psikhologicheskoi i svia- tootecheskoi literature. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2011. № 3. P. 24—46.
Glagolev V.S. Khristianskie i sekuliarnye aspekty sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoi kategorii “terpenie“. Khristianskaia kul’tura na poroge tret’ego tysiacheletiia. St. Petersburg: Publ. Sankt—Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo. 2000. P. 15—18.
Gostev A.A., Eliseev V.A., Fomin A.G. K probleme kontseptual’no-terminologichesk- ogo perevoda sviatootecheskikh opisanii psikhologicheskikh realii. Istoriia otechestvennoi i mirovoi psikhologicheskoi mysli. Moscow: Publ. IP RAN. 2006. P. 177—187.
Dembo T. Gnev kak dinamicheskaia problema. Levin K. Dinamicheskaia psikhologiia: Izbrannye trudy. Moscow: Publ. Smysl, 2001. P. 534—570.
Dronov M., prot. Pravoslavnaia asketika i psikhoanaliz. Al’fa i omega. 1998. № 3. P. 104—111; № 4. P. 116—124.
Kallist W., mitr. Sviataia Troitsa — paradigma chelovecheskoi lichnosti. Al’fa i Omega. 2002. № 2 (32). P. 110—123.
Lysiuk L.G. Khristianskaia model’ sem’i kak osnova semeinogo konsul’tirovaniia. MPZh. [Moscow Psychotherapy Journal] 2004. № 4. P. 65—78.
Filonik M.S. Psikhologicheskii analiz fenomenov iskazhenii religioznogo opyta. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2015. № 5. P. 107—122.
Khoruzhii S.S. Chelovek sushchee troiako razmykaiushchee sebia // Ocherki sinergi- inoi antropologii. Moscow: Publ. Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2005. P. 13—57.
Shan'kov F.M. Obrashchenie k dukhovnomu i religioznomu sovladaniiu v psikhotera- pii. Obzor zapadnykh issledovanii // Konsul'tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia. 2016. T. 24. № 5. P. 151—177. doi:10.17759/cpp2016240509
Watson P.J. Babel of Rationalities: Christian Psychology, Incommensurability, and the Important Role of Empirical Research. Christian Psychology Around the World. 2014. no 5, pp. 21—29.

PlumX