Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Al’mukhametova T.N., Kuminskaya E.A., Rzaeva F.R. Phenomenological analysis of the dynamics of clients’ experience in the process of psychotherapy: a case-study. Part 1 497
PhD in Psychology, Deputy Director, Head of Laboratory of Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, FBSSI «Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education», Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Senior researcher of the Laboratory of Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia
Researcher, Laboratory of Psychotherapy and Counseling Psychology, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education", Moscow, Russia
Researcher, Laboratory of Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia
Graduate student of theDepartment of Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University , Moscow, Russia
The paper describes the results of a phenomenological study of client experiences in the process of psychotherapy. We assumed that the experience changes during the course of psychotherapy, and the dynamics of the experience could be observed both within one session and between sessions. The sample consisted of 6 people aged 29 to 53, 5 women and 1 man. One woman attended 4 meetings with a psychotherapist, the man and other women — 3 meetings each. Conversations were recorded on a dictaphone and then transcribed. Two independent experts read and coded each transcript, and then codes were discussed. At the first stage of analysis, we noted unique semantic units. At the second stage, they were coded. We describe the dynamics of the experiences of each client separately from the beginning to the end of work with a psychotherapist. The results allow us to conclude that there are transformations of experiences in all clients; both in their experiences regarding the work process and also regarding the problem situations that were the reason for treatment. The results of further categorization, generalization, and interpretation will be described in the next paper.
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project №16- 36-01020). This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project №16- 36-01020).
Busygina N.P. Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody
issledovanii v psikhologii: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury
[Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology: a textbook for
undergraduate and graduate programs]. Moscow: Yurait, 2015. 423 p.
Kvale S. Issledovatel’skoe interv’yu [Research Interview].
Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2003. 301 p. (In Russ.).
Ulanovskii A.M. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya:
kachestvennye issledovaniya i rabota s perezhivaniem [Phenomenological
psychology: qualitative studies and work with experience]. Moscow: Smysl, 2016.
Giorgi A. The descriptive phenomenological method in
psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University,
2009. 233 p.
Martin D.J., Garske J.P., Davis M.K. Relation of the
therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000. Vol. 68 (3), pp.
Norcross J.C. Psychotherapy relationships that work:
Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2002. 464 p.
Orlinsky D.E., Ronnestad M.H., Willutzki U. Fifty years of
psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In Lambert M.J.
(ed.). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior
change. New York: Wiley, 2004, pp. 307—389.
Ryff C.D., Singer B.H. Best news yet on the six-factor
model of well-being. Social Science Research, 2006. Vol. 35 (4), pp.
1103—1119. doi:10.1016/j. ssresearch.2006.01.002