Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Ethical Attitudes of Russian Counseling Psychologists: Field of Disagreement and Potential Conflicts 610

Garanian N.G.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Counseling & Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: garanian@mail.ru

Zakharova Y.V.
Clinical Psychologist, Private Practice, IP Zakharova Yu. V., Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-8366
e-mail: mail@zakharova.info

Sorokova M.G.
Doctor of Education, PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Chair of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Information Technology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-6487
e-mail: sorokovamg@mgppu.ru

Abstract
The study is aimed at the identification of ethical beliefs in the group of Russian counseling psychologists. As a part of the anonymous online survey 217 counseling psychologists and psychotherapists completed the Inventory of Attitudes and Beliefs about Ethical Issues (Herlihy, Corey, 2014). Four experts (psychologists with advanced knowledge on counseling ethics) sorted out the inventory’s items into the categories of ethically indisputable (EID) and ethically disputable (ED). The findings indicate that about a fifth of the respondents are practicing without a degree in psychology, and 40% didn’t get psychotherapeutic approach-specific training. Low consistency in the ethical beliefs of Russian counseling psychologists has been demonstrated. Kohen’s cappa as a measure of inter-rater reliability among four experts was 0.512; this score is significantly lower than recommended. 44.7% of the respondents agreed with beliefs the experts attributed to EID, and 45.6% agreed with at least several ED beliefs about psychological counseling. Points of maximal disagreement between research participants were the possibility of dual relationships with clients, the obligation to conduct screening for potential counseling group members, the requirement to practice strictly within the scope of one’s license, and seeking for informal resolution in the case of a violation of an ethical standard by another counselor. Research findings are predictive of significant discrepancies in the ethical beliefs of Russian counselors and difficulties in collegial decision-making on ethical issues.

Keywords: ethical beliefs, Russian counseling psychologists, expert assessment, discrepancies

Column: Empirical Researches

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280106

For Reference

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Artemova E.L., Ph.D. (Technical Sciences), Associate Professor, School of Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence, Higher School of Economics, for her help in checking the Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal archive using computational linguistics methods.

References
  1. Armashova A.B. Eticheskie dilemmy vo vzaimodeistvii psikhologa-konsul’tanta i klienta. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Ethical dilemmas in the interaction of counseling psychologist and client. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Yaroslavl’, 2018. 277 p.
  2. Vpervye v Rossii v otnoshenii psikhologa vozbuzhdeno ugolovnoe delo o dovedenii do samoubiistva [For the first time in Russia, a criminal case was opened against a psychologist for incitement to suicide] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya gazeta [Psychological Newspaper]. Available at: https://psy.su/feed/4109/ (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  3. Gabbard G., Lester E. Psikhoanaliticheskie granitsy i ikh narusheniya [Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis]. Moscow: Nezavisimaya firma “Klass”, 2014. 272 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Gadzhieva S. Iz-za kommentariya «intsest», ostavlennogo psikhologom pod semeinym foto, pisatel’nitsa obratilas’ v prokuraturu [The writer complained to the prosecution office about the comment “incest” written by the psychologist under a family photo] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vechernyaya Moskva [ Evening Moscow]. 19.12.2015. Available at: https://vm.ru/news/227989.html (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  5. Gulina M.A. “Ezda v neznaemoe”: prepodavanie konsul’tativnoi psikhologii v stenakh universitetov [“Driving to unknown” — teaching counselling psychology at universities]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25 (3), pp. 109—131. doi:10.17759/cpp.2017250307. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  6. Garber I. Etika psikhoterapii i psikhologicheskogo konsul’tirovaniya v Rossii: postanovka problemy [Ethics of psychotherapy and psychological counseling in Russia: Statement of the problem]. Teoriya i praktika psikhoterapii [Theory and Practice of Psychotherapy], 2014. Vol. 1 (1), pp. 96—100.
  7. Diankova I. Nekotorye eticheskie problemy v sovremennoi amerikanskoi psikhoterapii i psikhologicheskom konsul’tirovanii [Some ethical issues in modern American psychotherapy and psychological counseling]. Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal [ Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal], 2002, no. 4, pp. 114—149.
  8. Karavaeva T.A., V’yunova T.S., Podsadnyi S.A. Znachenie eticheskikh norm i printsipov v psikhoterapii i ikh zakreplenie v pravovom regulirovanii [The value of ethical norms and principles in psychotherapy and their consolidation in legal regulations]. Vestnik psikhoterapii [Bulletin of Psychotherapy], 2008, no. 28, pp. 9—17.
  9. Karpitskaya D. Psikholog zastavlyal patsientok na publike razdevat’sya i otdavat’ brillianty [The psychologist made his patients undress in public and give away their diamonds] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Komsomol’skaya pravda. 24.04.2018. Available at: https://www.kp.ru/daily/26822/3860047/ (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  10. Kulikov A.I. Izuchenie seksual’nykh chuvstv patsientov i psikhoterapevtov v protsesse psikhoterapii. Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [The study of sexual feelings of patients and psychotherapists in the process of psychotherapy. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Saint Petersburg, 2004. 199 p.
  11. O psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu v gorode Moskve: Zakon goroda Moskvy ot 07.10.2009 № 43 [On psychological aid to the population in the city of Moscow: Law 43 of the city of Moscow, 07.10.2009] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https:// www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/292902/ (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  12. O psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: proekt Feder. zakona № 553338-6 [On psychological aid to the population in the Russian Federation: Draft of the federal law 553338-6] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://lawmon.ru/law/553338-6.html (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  13. Tarasova E.V., Cheremukhin A.D. Predstavleniya psikhologov-konsul’tantov ob eticheskikh tsennostyakh, professional’noi ustoichivosti i zhiznesposobnosti v deyatel’nosti [The concepts of psychologists-consultants about ethical values, professional stability and vitality in activity] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Universum: Psikhologiya i obrazovanie [Universum: Psychology and Education], 2017, no. 4 (34). Available at: http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/4615 (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  14. Frokmorton U. Popytki izmenit’ seksual’nuyu orientatsiyu: eticheskie aspekty [Attempts to change sexual orientation: Ethical aspects]. Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal [Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal], 2006, no. 1, pp. 175—195.
  15. Eticheskii kodeks psikhologa Rossiiskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva [Code of Ethics of the Russian Psychological Society] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://kpfu.ru/docs/F432125249/Eticheskij.kodeks.psihol__ga.pdf (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  16. Eticheskii kodeks Rossiiskoi psikhoterapevticheskoi assotsiatsii (RPA) ot 27.05.2019 [Code of Ethics of the Russian Psychotherapeutic Association] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://rpa-russia.ru/ecrpa/ (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  17. American Counseling Association. 2014 ACA Code of Ethics [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf (Accessed 06.09.2019).
  18. Bond T. Standards and Ethics for counseling in action. Los Angeles: Sage, 2000. 263 p.
  19. Burkholder D., Burkholder J. Reasons for ethical misconduct of counseling students: what do faculty thinks? [Elektronnyi resurs]. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 2014. Vol. 6 (2). Available at: https://repository.wcsu. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=jcps (Accessed 06.09.2019). doi:10.7729/62.1063
  20. Curran T., Hill A.P. Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 2019. Vol. 145 (4), pp. 410—429. doi:10.1037/bul0000138
  21. Ebrulkiz F. Bahar M., Umut A. Trainee psychological counselors’ understanding of ethics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2017. Vol. 6 (2), pp. 10—17.
  22. Gwet K. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: the definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. 4th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, 2014. 410 p.
  23. Herlihy B., Corey G. ACA ethical standards casebook. 7th ed. Alexandria: Wiley, 2014. 337 p.
  24. Twenge J., Konrath S., Foster J., et al. Egos inflating over time: meta-analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality, 2008. Vol. 76 (4), pp. 875— 902. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????