Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy - №1 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Scopus
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 28, no. 4)

Included in Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2075-3470

ISSN (online): 2311-9446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 1992

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Risk Intelligence Scale and its Relationship with Risk Readiness and Emotional Intelligence 251

|

Kornilova T.V.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of General Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-3793
e-mail: tvkornilova@mail.ru

Pavlova E.M.
PhD in Psychology, Engineer, Department of Psychology of Education and Pedagogics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1877-5704
e-mail: pavlova.lisa@gmail.com

Abstract
We present the results of validating the Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale (Craparo et al., 2018) in the Russian sample. The study tested the hypotheses about the relationships between subjective risk intelligence, acceptance of uncertainty and risk, and emotional intelligence. The participants (N=588) included 473 women and 115 men (Mage=27.09, SD=10.35); 260 people were tested online, and the rest — face-to-face. We used the Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale (SRIS), New Questionnaire of Tolerance for Uncertainty, Personal Decision-Making Factors, and Emotional Intelligence Scale (EmIn). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes established the four-factor structure of the questionnaire similar to the original. We found pairs of correlating scales that demonstrate emotional rejection of uncertainty and cognitive productive acceptance. Negative Attitude towards Uncertainty and Emotional Stress Vulnerability was higher in individuals with lower emotional intelligence, willingness to take risks, and tolerance for uncertainty. Problem Solving Self-Efficacy and Imaginative Capability correlated with emotional intelligence, willingness to take risks, and tolerance for uncertainty. The Russian version of SRIS has good psychometric characteristics, and we recommend it as a reliable tool to diagnose a person’s attitude towards uncertainty and risk; however, the understanding of subjective risk intelligence as a personal or cognitive characteristic is unclear.

Keywords: personality, individual differences, risk readiness, risk propensity, risk intelligence, emotional intelligence, tolerance of ambiguity.

Column: Validation and Development of New Psychodiagnostic Methods

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280404

For Reference

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-29-07069).

References
  1. Kornilova T.V. Novyi oprosnik tolerantnosti-intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti [The new questionnaire tolerance-intolerance to uncertainty]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010. Vol. 31 (1), рр. 74—86.
  2. Kornilova T.V. Intellektual’no-lichnostnyi potentsial cheloveka v usloviyakh neopredelennosti i riska [Intellectual and personal potential of a person under uncertainty and risk]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2016. 334 p.
  3. Kornilova T.V. Risk i myshlenie [Risk and thinking]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1994. Vol. 15 (4), pp. 20—32.
  4. Kornilova T.V., Razvaliaeva A.U. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnogo varianta polnogo oprosnika S. Epstaina «Ratsional’nyi-Opytnyi» (Rational-Experiental inventory) [The rationality and intuition scales in S. Epstein’s questionnaire REI (Russian approbation of the full version)]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2017. Vol. 38 (3), рр. 92—107. DOI:10.7868/S0205959217030084
  5. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., et al. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: edinstvo intellektual’no-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka. [The psychology of uncertainty: The unity of the intellectual and personal potential of a person]. Moscow: Smysl, 2010. 334 p.
  6. Lyusin D.V. Oprosnik na emotsional’nyi intellekt EmIn: novye psikhometricheskie dannye [Emotional intelligence questionnaire EmIn: new psychometric data]. In Lyusin D.V., Ushakov D.V. (eds.) Sotsial’nyi i emotsional’nyi intellekt: ot modelei k izmereniyam [Social and emotional intelligence: From the process to measurement]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2009, pp. 264—278.
  7. Pavlova E.M., Kornilova T.V. Kreativnost’ i tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti kak prediktory aktualizatsii emotsional’nogo intellekta v lichnostnom vybore [Creativity and tolerance to uncertainty as predictors for emotional intelligence actualization in personal choice] // Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2012. Vol. 33 (5), pp. 39—49.
  8. Smirnov S.D., Chumakova M.A., Kornilova T.V. Obraz mira v dinamicheskoi paradigme prognozirovaniya i kontrolya neopredelennosti [The image of the world in the dynamic control of uncertainty]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2016, no. 4, pp. 3—13.
  9. Anderson E.C., Carleton R.N., Diefenbach M., et al. The relationship between uncertainty and affect [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. Vol. 10. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504/full (Accessed 10.08.2020). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504
  10. Bar-On R. The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 2006. Vol. 18, pp. 13—25.
  11. Blais A.-R., Weber E.U. A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 2006. Vol. 1 (1), pp. 33—47. DOI:10.1037/t13084-000
  12. Charyton C., Snelbecker G.E., Elliott J.O., et al. College students’ general creativity as a predictor of cognitive risk tolerance. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 2013. Vol. 23 (2), pp. 79—96. DOI:10.1037/a0032706
  13. Craparo G., Magnano P., Paolillo A., et al. The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The development of a new scale to measure a new construct. Current Psychology, 2018. Vol. 37 (4), pp. 966—981. DOI:10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x
  14. Dewett Т. Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2006. Vol. 40 (1), pp. 27—45. DOI:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01265.x
  15. Evans D. Risk Intelligence: How to Live with Uncertainty. London: Atlantic Books, 2012. 288 p.
  16. Eysenck S.B.G., Eysenck H.J. Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 1978. Vol. 43 (3), pp. 1247—1255. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3f.1247
  17. Frenkel-Brunswick E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 1949. Vol. 11 (1), pp. 108—143. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
  18. Frenkel-Brunswick E. Tolerance towards ambiguity as a personality variable. The American Psychologist, 1948. Vol. 3, рр. 268.
  19. Furnham A., Marks J. Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology, 2013. Vol. 4 (9), pp. 717—728. DOI:10.4236/psych.2013.49102
  20. Gigerenzer G. Simply rational: Decision making in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 328 p.
  21. Hartley C., Phelps E. Anxiety and Decision-Making. Biological Psychiatry, 2012. Vol. 72 (2), pp. 113—118. DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.027
  22. Highhouse S., Nye C.D., Zhang D.C., et al. Structure of the DOSPERT: Is there evidence for a general risk factor? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2016. Vol. 30 (2), pp. 400—406. DOI:10.1002/bdm.1953
  23. Kahneman D. Tinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2011. 499 p.
  24. Knight F.H. The Meaning of Risk and Uncertainty. In Knight F. (ed.) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co, 1921, pp. 210—235.
  25. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Izmailova A.M. Implicit theories of intelligence and personality, attitudes towards uncertainty, and academic achievement in college students: cross-cultural study. The 3rd International Academic Conference On Social Sciences (July 25—26, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey). Batumi, Georgia: The International Institute for Academic Development, 2015, pp. 189—202.
  26. Lauriola M., Weller J. Beyond daredevils: risk taking from a temperament perspective. In Raue M., Lermer E., Streicher B. (eds.) Psychological Aspects of Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications. New York: Springer, 2018, pp. 3—36. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_1
  27. Lönnqvist J.-E., Verkasalo M., Walkowitz G., et al. Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015. Vol. 119. P. 254—266. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.003
  28. Mayer J.D., Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey P., Sluyter D. (eds.) Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. New York: Basic Books, 1997, pp. 2—21.
  29. Pavlova E.V., Kornilova T.V. The “Positive Triad” of the regulation of personal choice among creative professionals. In Moneta G.B. (ed.) Psychology of Creativity. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2016, pp. 153—166.
  30. Petrova D., Traczyk J., Garsia-Retamero R. What shapes the probability weighting function? Influence of affect, numeric competencies, and information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2019. Vol. 32 (2), pp. 124—139. DOI:10.1002/bdm.2100
  31. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012. Vol. 48 (2), pp. 1—36. DOI:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  32. Slovic P., Peters E. Risk Perception and Affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2006. Vol. 15, pp. 322—352. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
  33. Sternberg R.J., Lubart, T.I. Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 1996. Vol. 51, pp. 677—688. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677.
  34. Suter R.S., Thorsten P.Т., Hertwig R. How affect shapes risky choice: Distorted probability weighting versus probability neglect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2016. Vol. 29, pp. 437—449. DOI:10.1002/bdm.1
  35. Volz K.G., Gigerenzer G. Cognitive processes in decisions under risk are not the same as in decisions under uncertainty [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 6. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2012.00105/ full (Accessed 10.08.2020). DOI:10.3389/fnins.2012.00105
  36. Zhang D.C, Highhouse S., Nye C.D. Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2019. Vol. 32, pp. 152—167. DOI:10.1002/bdm.2102
  37. Zuckerman M. Sensation Seeking: Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases. In Wright J.D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 607—614. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08- 097086-8.25036-8
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????