Parent-Сhild Interaction During Early Childhood: Comparative Analysis of Parent Responsiveness Profile Among Dyads with Typically and Atypically Developing Children 296
PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Neuro-and Pathopsycholog, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Leading Research Associate, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
The paper presents the results of the empirical study that aims to build an average group profile of parent responsiveness (PR) for parents with typically and atypically developing children before 3 years of age and to compare average PR profiles between these groups. Seventy parents with typically developing children and 32 parents with atypically developing children (autism, Down syn- drome, intellectual disabilities) between 10 and 36 months of age participated in the present study. The first sample was divided into two sub-groups: parents with typically developing children younger than 12 months of age (infants), and parents with typically developing children between 12 and 36 months of age (toddlers). Parents with atypically developing children were set as one group. The study used the PATTERN technology that employs video observations. Parent responsiveness was assessed on 4 scales (Dominance, Apathy, Sensitivity, and Support); group and individual PR profiles were constructed according to these scales. Sample comparison was conducted using Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. It has been shown that the PR to typically developing children differs compared to atypically developing children. Parents of atypically developing children are more inclined to dominate and are also characterized by greater psychological apathy. The age of typically developing children influences the nature of PR.
Keywords: parental responsiveness, video-based observations, The Observer XT, early childhood, mother-child interaction, mother-child dyad, free play, PATTERN technology.
Column: Empirical studies
Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project no. 19-513-92001 “Cross-cultural peculiarities of interaction between a significant adult and a child in Russia and Vietnam”
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank their colleagues for valuable contribution and support to this research. They are also thankful to all the parents who participated in this research. The authors are grateful to V.V. Park, a young scientist, Clinical Psychologist at the Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology of Development (Moscow State University of Psychology and Education), for her help in coding cases with the Observer XT program, and to N. Irgashev for developing the Pattern+ software.
- Vygotskii L.S. Voprosy detskoi psikhologii [Issues of child psychology].
Saint Petersburg: Perspektiva, 2018. 224 p.
- Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V. Semeinaya psikhologiya: metodika “Otsenka
detsko- roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya”. Evaluation of Child-parent Interaction
(ECPI-2.0): prakticheskoe posobie [Family psychology: Evaluation of
child-parent interaction (ECPI-2.0). Manual]. Moscow: Yurait, 2019. 223 p.
- Galasyuk I.N., Mitina O.V. Vzaimodeistvie roditelya s rebenkom rannego
vozrasta: struktura i dinamika roditel’skoi otzyvchivosti [The interaction of
the parent with the young child: Structure and dynamics of parental
responsiveness]. Kul’turno- istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical
Psychology, 2020. Vol. 16 (4), pp. 72—86. DOI:10.17759/chp.2020160408. (In
Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
- Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V. Metodika “Otsenka detsko-roditel’skogo
vzaimodeistviya” Evaluation of child-parent interaction (ECPI) [Evaluation of
child-parent interaction (ECPI)]. Moscow: Perspektiva Publ., 2017. 304 p.
- Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V., Irgashev N.R., et al. Otkrytaya
professional’naya ekspertiza metodiki detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodei-stviya:
vektory razvitiya psikhologicheskogo instrumentariya [Open professional
examination of the methodology of parent-child interaction: Development vectors
of psychological tools]. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya =
Actual Problems Of Psychological Knowledge, 2018, no. 3 (48), pp. 5—24.
- Lisina M.I. Problemy ontogeneza obshcheniya [The issues of communication in
ontogenesis]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1986. 144 p.
- Mamaichuk I.I. Psikhokorrektsionnye tekhnologii dlya detei s problemami v
razvitii: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. [Psychocorrection
technologies for children with disabilities. Handbook for universities. 2nd
ed., revised and expanded]. Moscow: Yurait, 2019. 318 p.
- Tokarskaya L.V., Lavrova M.A., Bakushkina N.I., et al. Detsko-roditel’skoe
vzaimodeistvie i razvitie rebenka rannego
vozrasta [Parent-child interaction and early childhood
development]. Ekaterinburg: UMTs UPI Publ., 2019. 206
- Bejarano-Martín Á., Canal-Bedia R., Magán-Maganto M., et al. Early
detection, diagnosis and intervention services for young children with autism
spectrum disorder in the European Union (ASDEU): Family and professional
perspectives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2019. Vol. 50 (9),
pp. 3380—3394. DOI:10.1007/s10803-019-04253-0
- Caplan B., Blacher J., Eisenhower A. Responsive parenting and prospective
social skills development in early school-aged children with autism spectrum
disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2019. Vol. 49 (8), pp.
- Edmunds S.R., Kover S.T., Stone W.L. The relation between parent verbal
responsiveness and child communication in young children with or at risk for
autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism
Research, 2019. Vol. 12 (5), pp. 715—731. DOI:10.1002/aur.2100
- Flippin M., Watson L.R. Fathers’ and mothers’ verbal responsiveness and the
language skills of young children with autism spectrum disorder. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2015. Vol. 24 (3), pp. 400—410.
- Galasyuk I.N., Lavrova M.A. Suleymanova E.V., et al. Parent responsiveness
and its role in neurocognitive and socioemotional development of one-year-old
preterm infants. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2019. Vol. 12 (3), pp.
- Galasyuk I.N., Mitina O.V. Developing and approbation system of indicators
for evaluation the significant adults’ responsiveness to toddler’s
communication signals. Book of Abstracts: XVI European Congress of Psychology
(2—5 July, 2019, Moscow). Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2019, p. 393.
- Gengoux G.W., Schapp S., Burton S., et al. Effects of a parent-implemented
Developmental Reciprocity Treatment Program for children with autism spectrum
disorder. Autism, 2019. Vol. 23 (3), pp. 713—725.
- Hollowell J., Dumbaugh M., Belem M., et al. “Grandmother, aren’t you going
to sing for us?” Current childcare practices and caregivers’ perceptions of and
receptivity to early childhood development activities in rural Burkina Faso
[Elektronnyi resurs]. BMJ Global Health, 2019. Vol. 4 (2). Available at:
https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/2/ e001233 (Accessed 10.09.2020).
- Kasari C., Siller M., Huynh L.N., et al. Randomized controlled trial of
parental responsiveness intervention for toddlers at high risk for autism.
Infant Behavior and Development, 2014. Vol. 37 (4), pp. 711—721.
- Leezenbaum N.B., Campbell S.B., Butler D., et al. Maternal verbal responses
to communication of infants at low and heightened risk of autism. Autism, 2014.
Vol. 18 (6), pp. 694—703. DOI:10.1177/1362361313491327
- Lyall K., Constantino J.N., Weisskopf M.G., et al. Parental social
responsiveness and risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring. JAMA
Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 71 (8), pp. 936—942.
- Van Keer I., Colla S., Van Leeuwen K., et al. Exploring parental behavior
and child interactive engagement: A study on children with a significant
cognitive and motor developmental delay. Research in Developmental
Disabilities, 2017. Vol. 64, pp. 131— 142. DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.04.002
- Wade M., Jenkins J.M., Venkadasalam V.P., et al. The role of maternal
responsiveness and linguistic input in pre-academic skill development: A
longitudinal analysis of pathways. Cognitive Development, 2018. Vol. 45, pp.
125—140. DOI:10.1016/j. cogdev.2018.01.005