Aggressiveness in Belorussian Criminals Convicted for Different Types of Crimes

Fourmanov I.A.

Psychology and Law - №3 / 2020 | Перейти к описанию

Previous issue (2020. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

RU In Russian

Psychology and Law
2011. Vol. 1, no. 2
ISSN: 2222-5196 (online)

Aggressiveness in Belorussian Criminals Convicted for Different Types of Crimes ¹⁰³³

Fourmanov I.A.
Doctor of Psychology, Division Head of Psychology, Belorussian State University, Minsk, Belarus
e-mail: fourmigor@gmail.com

Full Text in Russian (PDF, 790 kb)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

RUIn Russian

The structure of aggressiveness as a delinquent’s personal trait is regarded as consisting of four sub-traits: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility. It is marked out that in criminals who committed manslaughter have significantly higher levels of physical and verbal aggression that people convicted for the other violent crimes, sexual offence and non-violent crimes. It is shown that verbal aggression has the highest proportion in the structure of aggressiveness, significantly exceeding the other sub-traits levels in groups, convicted for manslaughter, sexual offence and non-violent crimes. Violent vector of crimes is mainly conditioned with interrelationships of physical aggression, anger and hostility, inclination to verbal aggression. Peculiarities of aggressiveness in the convicted for different types of crimes are described.

Keywords: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, manslaughter, violent crimes, sexual offences, non-violent crimes.

Column: The Penitentiary Psychology and Penal Practice

For Reference

Fourmanov I.A. Aggressiveness in Belorussian Criminals Convicted for Different Types of Crimes [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiia i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2011. Vol. 1, no. 2 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Berkovic L. Agressija: prichiny, posledstvija i kontrol'. SPb., 2001.
Fromm Je. Anatomija chelovecheskoj destruktivnosti. M., 1994.
Furmanov I. A. Agressija i nasilie: diagnostika, profilaktika i korrekcija. SPb., 2007.
Archer J., Haigh А. Beliefs about aggression among mаlе and female prisoners // Aggressive Behavior. 1997. № 23.
Baker M. T., Van Hasselt V. B., Sellers A. H. Validation of the Novaco Anger Scale in an Incarcerated Offender Population // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008. Vol. 35.
Buss A. H., Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility // Journ. of Consulting Psychology. 1957. № 21.
Buss A. H., Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 63. № 3.
Gunn J., Gristwood L. Use of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory among British prisoners // Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1975. № 43.
Loza W., Loza-Fanous А. Anger and prediction of violent and nonviolent offenders' recidivism // Journ. of Interpersonal Violence. 1999. № 14.
Mills J. F., Kroner D. G. Anger as a Predictor of Institutional Misconduct and Recidivism in a Sample of Violent Offenders // Journ. of Interpersonal Violence. 2003. Vol. 18.
Smith Р., Waterman M. Levels of aggression and impulsivity in prisoners using self-report questionnaires // Thе bulletin of the international society for research on aggression. 2004. Vol. 26. № 2.