Previous issue (2019. Vol. 9, no. 3)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Internal factors affecting the jury members verdict 1574
PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Clinical and Forensic Psychology Department, Faculty of Legal Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia
Student, Department of Legal Psychology, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia
The article is devoted to the analysis of socio-demographic and individual psychological characteristics that influence the verdict of jury. The study involved 38 men and women aged 25 to 64 years. With the help of a questionnaire, developed on the basis of legal development model by J. Tapp and F. Levine, we revealed levels of jury members’ legal conscience, which, together with socio-demographic characteristics and personality characteristics of the subjects, identified by R. Cattell 16PF Questionnaire, were related to the responses on the Questionnaire while returning verdict on specially selected criminal cases with implicit guilt of the defendant. According to the study, it was determined that the socio-demographic characteristics of the jurors did not significantly affect their verdict, and among the psychological characteristics of the jurors the greatest impact on their verdict has the level of legal development. Thus, depending on the nature of the crime (violent, non-violent or committed through negligence), the same level of legal conscience differently affect the decision of jurors.
- Adorno T. Issledovanie avtoritarnoj lichnosti // Pod obshh. red.
d-ra filos. nauk V. P. Kultygina. M., 2001.
- Gulevich O.A. Psihologija v sude prisjazhnyh. Analiticheskij obzor:
Uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov fakul'tetov psihologii vysshih uchebnyh
zavedenij po special'nosti 020400 – «Psihologija». M., 2003.
- Gulevich O.A. Psihologicheskie osnovy jurisprudencii: Uchebnoe
posobie. M., 2009.
- Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii «O prisjazhnyh zasedateljah federal'nyh sudov
obshhej jurisdikcii v RF»: [prinjat Gos. Dumoj 31 ijulja 2004 g.: odobr.
Sovetom Federacii 8 avgusta 2004 g., № 113-FZ] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF,
2004, № 34, st. 3528.
- Kapustina A.N. Mnogofaktornaja lichnostnaja metodika R. Kettella.
- Butler B., Moran G. The impact of death qualification, belief
in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venire
persons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital
trials // Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2007.
Vol. 25. P. 57–68.
- ForsterLee R., ForsterLee L., Horowitz I.A., King E. The effects of
defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a
murder trial // Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2006. Vol. 24. P.
- Sommers S.R., Ellsworth P.C. White juror bias. An investigation of
prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom // Psychology,
Public Policy, and Law. 2001. Vol. 7. P. 201–229.
- Tapp J.L., Kohlbrg L. Developing senses of law and legal justice //
The Journal of Social Issues. 1971. Vol. 27. P. 65–92.
- Worthington D.L. Exploring juror`s listening processes: the effect
of listening style preference on juror decision making // International Journal
of Listening. 2001. Vol. 15. P. 20–37.