Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

CrossRef

Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

History of psychological assessment testimony 997

Krasavina A.G.
post graduate student of the chair of legal and forensic psychology , Moscow State University of Psychology and Education , Moscow, Russia
e-mail: netka-2107@mail.ru

Abstract
The article presents different points of view on the assessment of witness statements. This review results from a range of issues coming up in the modern practice of a forensic psychologist. One of the recent problems connected to the assessment of witness statements validity, is forensic and psychological expert reports, realized on the basis of not locally approved methods, backed by reliable studies. The article describes different approaches of foreign and national specialists to the issue of credibility of witnesses. Despite the significant amount of works in this field, there are still differences and contradictions in researches regarding the assessment of the quality of witness statements. That is why familiarization with the history of the issue is necessary for its further full and complete examination, as well as for avoiding the incorrect operation with existing results in the modern practice of a psychologist.

Keywords: testimony, evaluation of witness testimony, the reliability of the testimony.

Column: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2017070302

For Reference

References
  1. Arsen'ev V.D. Ispol'zovanie special'nyh znanij pri ustanovlenii fakticheskih obstojatel'stv ugolovnogo dela [Using special knowledge in establishing the circumstances of the criminal case]. Krasnojarsk, 1986. 4 p.
  2. Gross G. Rukovodstvo k rassledovaniju prestuplenij [A guide to crime investigation]. In V.V. Romanov, E.V. Romanova (ed.) Juridicheskaja psihologija [Legal psychology]. Moscow: Jurist, 2000. 282 p.
  3. Dozorceva E.G., Afanas'eva A.G. Ocenka dostovernosti svidetel'skih pokazanij nesovershennoletnih [Assesment of credibility of witnesses]. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2015. Tom 4. No. 3, pp. 47–56
  4. Engalychev V.F., Kravcova G.K., Holopova E.N. Sudebnaja psihologicheskaja jekspertiza po vyjavleniju priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti informacii, soobshhaemoj uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisjam sledstvennyh dejstvij i operativno-razysknyh meroprijatij). Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2016. 328 p.
  5. Kantorovich J.A. Psihologija svidetel'skih pokazanij [The psychology of testimony] In V.V. Romanov, E.V. Romanova (ed.) Juridicheskaja psihologija [Legal psychology]. Moscow: Jurist, 2000, pp.370-371
  6. Kertes I. Taktika i psihologicheskie osnovy doprosa [Tactics and psychological bases of interrogation]. Moscow, Juridicheskaya literatura, 1965. 41 p.
  7. Koni A.F. Sobranie sochinenij v 8 tomah [Collection works in 8 volumes]. Moscow, Juridicheskaya literature, 1967. 48 p.
  8. Kochenov M. M. Psihologija doprosa maloletnih svidetelej [Psyhology of questioning of young witnesses]. In T.N. Kurbatova (ed.) Juridicheskaja psihologija: kriminal'naja psihologija [Legal psychology: criminal psychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2001, pp. 374-409.
  9. Lurija A.R. Jeksperimental'naja psihologija v sudebno-sledstvennom dele [Eхperimental psychology in a legal case]. Sov. Pravo, no. 2 Tom 26, 1927, pp. 84-100.
  10. Medicinskaja i sudebnaja psihologija. Kurs lekcij: Uchebnoe posobie. In T.B. Dmitrieva, F.S. Safuanov (ed.) Moscow: Genezis, 2005, 512 p.
  11. Ratinov A.R., Efimova N.I. Psihologija doprosa obvinjaemogo [The psychology of interrogation of the accused]. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Krasnoyarskogo Universiteta, 1988. 80 p.
  12. Sitkovskaja O.D. Psihologija svidetel'skih pokazanij [Psychology of testimony]. Moscow: Prokurorskaja i sledstvennaja praktika, no. 3-4, 2007, pp. 143-240.
  13. Smirnova S.A., Makushkin E.V., Asnis A.Ja., Vaskje E.V., Dozorceva E.G., Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N., Shipshin S.S., Oshevskij D.S., Berdnikov D.V., Sekerazh T.N. , Kalinina A.N. O nepravomernosti opredelenija dostovernosti pokazanij putem sudebnoj jekspertizy [About illegality determination of the validity of evidence through forensic examination]. Psihologija i pravo. Tom 6. No. 3. 2016, pp. 61–78.
  14. Fraj O. Detekcija lzhi i obmana [Lie detection and deception]. Saint-Petersburg: PRAJM-EVROZNAK, 2005. 320 p.
  15. Fraj O. Lozh'. Tri sposoba vyjavlenija lzhi [Three ways of detection lies]. Saint-Petersburg: PRAJM-EVROZNAK, 2006. 286 p.
  16. Shtern V. Psihologija svidetel'skogo pokazanija [Psychology of testimony]. Saint-Petersburg: Vestnik prava, 1902. 15 p.
  17. Vrij A. Criteria-based content analysis a qualitative review of the first 37 Studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2005. Vol. 11. No. 1. pp. 3–41.
  18. Vrij A., Mann S. Criteria-Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2006. Vol. 12 no. 4. pp. 337-349.
  19. Boychuk T. Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children’s statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, 1991.
  20. Bull R. Obtaining evidence expertly: The reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 1992. No. 1. pp. 3–36.
  21. Bull R. Innovative techniques for the questioning of child witnesses, especially those who are young and those with learning disability. 1995, pp. 179–195.
  22. Bull R., Vrij A., Memon A. Obtaining information from child witnesses. Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill, 1998. pp. 188–210.
  23. Cattell J. M. Measurements of the accuracy of recollection. Science. No. 2, 1895. Pp. 761–766.
  24. Esplin P. W., Boychuk T., Raskin D.C. A field validity study of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children’s statements in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment. June. 1988. 19 p.
  25. Honts C. R. Assessing children’s credibility: Scientific and legal issues in 1994. North Dakota Law Review. 70, 1994. рр. 879–903.
  26. Lamb M. E., Sternberg K. J., Esplin P. W., Hershkowitz I., Orbach Y., Hovav M. Criterion-Based Content Analysis: A field validation study. Child Abuse and Neglect. 21, 1997. pp. 255–264.
  27. Santtila P., Roppola H., Runtti M., Niemi P. Assessment of child witness statements using criteria-based content analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer's emotional style. Psychology, Crime and Law. 6:3, 2000. pp. 159-179.
  28. Raskin D. C., Esplin P.W. Assessment of children’s statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.). The suggestibility of children’s recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1991. pp. 153–165.
  29. Raskin D. C., Esplin P.W. Statement Validity Assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment. 13, 1991. рр. 265–291.
  30. Ruby C. L., Brigham J.C. The usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3, 1997. pp. 705–737.
  31. Steller M., Köhnken G. Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989. pp. 217–245.
  32. Undeutsch U. Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 1982. pp. 27–56.
  33. Wells G. L., Loftus E.F. Commentary: Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J. Doris (Ed.). The suggestibility of children’s recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1991. pp. 168–171.
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????