Projective Test «Congruity and Advantages» 269
Professor, Scientific and Academic Chair of the Federal Mediation Institute, Head of Chair of
Mediation in the Social Sphere, Department of Juridical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
Post Graduate Student, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
MD, Professor of mediation in the social sphere, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
Junior Researcher, Federal Institute of Mediation, Moscow, Russia
lecturer of department of mediation in the social sphere, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
The article presents the results of a pilot study developed by the authors of the projective test “Congruity and Advantages”. The research aims to study the main psychometric attributes of the test. The selection included 68 subjects of both genders at the age over 18. According to the study results, from the point of view of substantive validity, determined by the Delphic method, the “Congruity and Advantages” Test allows assessing the severity of two characteristics of the subjects: 1) subject's possible preferences of behavior aimed at acquiring advantages, 2) subject's preference of behavior aimed at matching one's choice with the interests of other people and/or circumstances. Criterion validity of the test is defined as sufficiently high. On an advantage scale R Spearman = 0,77 (at р<0,0001). On a scale of congruity of their behavior with others Spearman R =0,68 (at р<0,0001). Retest reliability after the study by the methods of rank correlation indicated R Spearman = 0,83 (at р<0,005). In addition, the monitoring results of the parties' tendency to violate agreements already reached reveal a significant correlation between the indicators of the “Congruity and Advantages” Test and the number of violations of agreements reached - Spearman R = 0,69 (at р=0,0001). Thus, the “Congruity and Advantages” Test can be practical in mediation as both to predict the tendency of the parties to harmonize their actions with others or to prefer their advantages, and to predict the probability of preserving agreements already reached.
Baturin N.A., Vuchetich E.V., Kostromina S.N. et al.
Rossijskij standart testirovaniya personala (vremennaya versiya, sozdannaya
dlya shirokogo obsuzhdeniya v 2015 godu) (rus.) // Organizacionnaya
psihologiya. [Russian standard for personnel testing (temporary version,
created for wide discussion in 2015) (Rus.) / / Organizational psychology].
2015. June (T. 5, V. 2). pp. 67—138.
Venger A.L. Psihologicheskie risunochnye testy:
Illyustrirovannoe rukovodstvo. [Psychological drawing tests: Illustrated
guide.] Moscow: VLADOS-PRESS, 2003.160 p.
Rajgorodskij D. YA. Prakticheskaya psihodiagnostika.
Metodiki i testy. Uchebnoe posobie. [Practical psychodiagnosis. Methods and
tests. Textbook.] Samara: Izdatel'skij Dom «BAHRAH-M», 2001. 672 р.
SHamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V., Pchelinceva D.N.
Rezul'taty analiza osoznannogo izmeneniya urovnya dominirovaniya pri
modelirovanii sporov. //Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. [The results of the
analysis of conscious changes in the level of dominance in the modeling of
disputes. // Science and business: ways of development.] 2015. № 6. pp.
SHamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V., Pchelinceva D.N.,
Stepanishchev A.N. Rezul'taty analiza psihologicheskih faktorov, vliyayushchih
na dinamiku sporov i ehkspertnaya ocenka ih podatlivosti storonnemu vliyaniyu.
//Global'nyj nauchnyj potencial. [The results of the analysis of psychological
factors affecting the dynamics of disputes and expert assessment of their
compliance to outside influence. Global scientific potential.] 2015. № 4 (49).
Shamlikashvili C.A., Haritonov S.V. Rol' ustanovok
vospriyatiya v dostizhenii soglashenij vnutri semejnyh par.//Teoriya i praktika
obshchestvennogo razvitiya. [The role of plants in the perception of agreement
within couples. // Theory and practice of social development.] 2013. № 9. pp.