Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 10, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)


Psychology and Law

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2222-5196


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2011

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Social Ostracism: Current State of the Problem, Methodology and Research Methods 151

Boykina E.E.
Post Graduate Student, Department of Legal and Forensic Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal and Forensic psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia

Chirkina R.V.
PhD in Psychology, Head of the Department of Legal and Forensic Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia

The problem of overcoming the risks and factors that generate destructive (anti-social, delinquent, auto-destructive, etc.) behavior of minors and youth is relevant for juvenile legal psychology and requires the construction of effective research models. The article considers the phenomenon of ostracism as one of the significant predictors of destructive behavior. According to K. D. Williams` ostracism model in a situation of ostracism, one or more basic needs of an individual are threatened: control, self-esteem (the level of self-esteem decreases), belonging and meaningful existence That, in the end, can determine radical reactions in the ostracized: autoagression, displaced aggression, the decision to join extremist organizations or cults, and other acts of anti-social behavior. This fact served as an impetus for a large number of studies in this area and mediated the creation of its own methodological base, applicable exclusively to the study of the phenomenon of social ostracism (ignoring, exclusion, rejection). The article attempts to systematize the methodology of studying the phenomenon of social ostracism: research methods are considered not only from the position of the object (target) of ostracism, but also the subject (source) and observer (vicar ostracism); descriptions of experimental schemes are carried out. The article is of interest to researchers who study the psychological aspects of ignoring, rejecting, and / or excluding, as well as to methodologists.

Keywords: social ostracism, exclusion, ignoring, rejection, destructive behavior, methodology, Cyberball, O`Cam, O`Train, Ostracism Online, Atimia.

Column: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology


For Reference

  1. Boykina E.E. Ostrakizm i rodstvennye fenomeny: obzor zarubezhnyh issledovanij [Elektronnyj resurs] [Ostracism and related phenomena: review of foreign studies]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2019, Vol. 9, no. 3. pp.127-140. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2019090310 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.)
  2. Dozorceva E.G., Badmaeva V.D., Oshevskij D.S., Aleksandrova N.A. Ocenka riska protivopravnyh dejstvij u detej i podrostkov: metod. rekomendacii. M.: FGBU «GNCSSP imeni V.P. Serbskogo» Minzdravsocrazvitiya Rossii, 2011. p. 25
  3. Martynova I.R. Sovremennye zarubezhnye napravleniya issledovanij faktorov riska protivopravnogo povedeniya u nesovershennoletnih [Elektronnyj resurs] [Present-day foreign directions of researches of risk factors of unlawful behavior among minors] Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2016, Vol. 6, no.2 pp.41-56. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2016060104 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.)
  4. Syrokvashina K.V. Napadeniya v shkolah: agressivnye i autoagressivnye dejstviya nesovershennoletnih [Elektronnyj resurs] [School attacks: aggressive and auto-aggressive actions of juveniles] Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology],  2019. Vol.8, no. 3, pp.. 37–44. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2019080304 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.)
  5. Tihonova A.D., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Ernst-Vintila A., Bovina I.B. Radikalizaciya v podrostkovo-molodezhnoj srede: v poiskah ob"yasnitel'noj skhemy [Elektronnyj resurs] [Radicalisation of Adolescents and Youth: In Search of Explanations] Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2017. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 32–40. doi:10.17759/chp.2017130305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  6. Chirkina R.V., Delibalt V.V., Dozorceva E.G., Degtyarev A.V., Debol'skij M.G., Voronina A.V. K voprosu obosnovaniya diagnosticheskih priznakov razlichnyh kategorij nesovershennoletnih s protivopravnym povedeniem v kontekste deyatel'nosti PMPK [Elektronnyj resurs] [About the substantiation of diagnostic indices in different categories of juveniles with delinquent behavior within the authority of the psychological, medical and educational committee]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2018, Vol. 8, no. 1. pp.77-94. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080106 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  7. Godwin A. et al. Are all ostracism experiences equal? A comparison of the autobiographical recall, Cyberball, and O-Cam paradigms Adolescents. Behavior Research Method, 2013, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0408-0
  8. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  9. Beest Van I., Williams K. D. When Inclusion Costs and Ostracism Pays, Ostracism Still Hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 918–928. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918
  10. Eisenberger N.I., Lieberman M.D., Williams K.D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 2003, vol. 302, pp. 290–292. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134
  11. Goodacre R., Zadro L. O`Cam: A new paradigm for investigating the effects of ostracism. Behavior Research Methods, 2010, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 768–774. doi: 10.375/BMR.42.3.768
  12. Hawkley L.C., Williams K.D., Cacioppo J.T. Responses to ostracism across adulthood. SCAN, 2010, vol. 6, pp. 234–243. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq045
  13. Twenge J.M. et al. If you can’t join them, beat them: effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1058–1069. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1058
  14. Nezlek J. B. et al. Ostracism in Everyday Life: The Effects of Ostracism on Those Who Ostracize. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, vol. 155, pp. 432-451. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1062351
  15. Wolf W. et al. Ostracism Online: A social media ostracism paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 2014. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0475-x
  16. Gooly S.L. et al. Ostracizing for a Reason: A Novel Source Paradigm for Examining the Nature and Consequences of Motivated Ostracism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, vol. 155, pp. 410–431. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1060933
  17. Over H., Carpenter M. Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Developmental Science, 2009, vol. 12,. no. 3, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x
  18. Pfundmair M. Ostracism promotes a terroristic mindset. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2018, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19434472.2018.1443965
  19. Tindall I. et al. Psychological flexibility and ostracism: Experiential avoidance rather than cognitive fusion moderates distress from perceived ostracism over time. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j/jcbs/2018/02/001
  20. Chen Z. et al. Rejecting another pains the self: The impact of perceived future rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2014, vol. 50, pp. 225–233. doi: 10. 1016/j.jesp.2013.10.007
  21. Ren D., Wesselmann E.D., Williams K.D. Hurt people hurt people: ostracism and aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2018, vol. 19, pp. 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.026
  22. Schaafsma J., Williams K. D. Exclusion, intergroup hostility, and religious fundamentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, vol. 48, pp. 829–837. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.015
  23. Schneider F.M. et al. Social media ostracism: The effects of being excluded online. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, vol. 73, pp. 385–393. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.052
  24. Gilman R. et al. Validation of the Ostracism Experience Scale for Adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 2012, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 319–330. doi: 10.1037/a0030913
  25. Kassner M.P. et al. Virtually Ostracized: Studying Ostracism in Immersive Virtual Environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2012, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 399–403. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0113
  26. Waldeck D. Qualitative Research with Participants Suffering From Ostracism: A Practical Guide For the Novice Researcher. The Qualitative Report, 2017, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1744–1758. URL: (accessed 22.01.2018)
  27. Wesselmann E.D., Bagg D., Williams K.D. «I feel your pain»: the effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.003
  28. Wesselmann E.D., Ren D., Williams K.D. Motivations for responses to ostracism. Frontiers in Psychology. Cognitive Science, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00040
  29. Wesselmann E.D., Williams K.D., Hales A.H. Vicarious ostracism. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013, vol. 7, no. 153, pp. 1–2. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00153
  30. Sommer K. L. et al. When silence speaks louder than words: Explorations into the intrapsychic and interpersonal consequences of social ostracism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2001, vol. 23, pp. 225–243. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2304_1
  31. Williams K. D. Ostracism. The Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, vol. 58, pp. 425–452. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
  32. Williams K. D. Ostracism: A Temporal Need-Threat Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, vol. 41, pp. 275—314. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
  33. Williams K. D., Nida S.A. Ostracism: Consequences and Coping. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 2011, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 71–75. doi: 10.1177/0963721411402480
  34. Williams K. D., Zadro L. Ostracism: On being ignored, excluded, and rejected. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 21–53. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130157.003.0002
  35. Wirth J.H., Bernstein M.J., Leroy A.S. Atimia: A New Paradigm for Investigating How Individuals Feel When Ostracizing Others. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, vol. 155, pp. 497–514. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1060934
  36. Masten C.L. et al. Witnessing peer rejection during early adolescence: neural correlates of empathy for experiences of social exclusion. Social Neuroscience, 2010, vol. 5, no. 5–6, pp. 496–507. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.490673
  37. Wölfer R., Scheithauer H. Ostracism in Childhood and Adolescence: Emotional, Cognitive, and Behavioral Effects of Social exclusion. Journal Social Influence, 2013, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 217–236. doi: 10.1080/15534510.2012.706233
  38. Zadro L., Williams K.D., Richardson R. Riding the `O` Train: Comparing the Effects of Ostracism and Verbal Dispute on Targets and Sources. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2005, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 125–143. doi: 10/1177/1368430205051062
  39. Zwolinski J. Psychological and neuroendocrine reactivity to ostracism. Aggressive behavior, 2012, vol. 38, pp. 108–125. doi: 10.1002/ab.21411





© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????