Main Models of Medical and Psychological Work for Prevention of Repeated Drunk Driving (International Experience)

The article analyses foreign scientific data and looks into the medical and psychological aspect of modern system of prevention of recurring crimes arising from drunk driving. Eco-nomically developed countries are shown to have obligatory medical and psychological in-terventions as part of their process of re-authorization to drive, and the scale and duration of such interventions depend on the legal framework of a particular state. Generalization of the material studied by the authors of the article led to formulation of a few organizational work models for medical practitioners and psychologists to help them prevent recurring drunk driving. The first model suggests that preventive measures are only aimed to raise of-fending drivers’ awareness of alcohol and drug addiction. The second model demands that the authorities assess the mental health and psychological preparedness for safe driving in offending drivers. The compulsory therapeutic and rehabilitation measures for persons ad-dicted to psychoactive substances in these countries are not included in drunk driving pre-vention system. The third model involves extended and long-term therapeutic and rehabili-tation programs for persons who indulged in drunk driving. Such programs include reveal-ing one’s unconscious motivations along with subsequent transformation of one’s former convictions and customary behavioral patterns. The authors believe that the "extended out-come" of these programs can be seen as an advantage of this model, since overcoming one’s addiction has a positive impact on all social aspects of one’s life activity. The authors point out the social and economical effectiveness of the models under discussion and sub-stantiate their applicability in the domestic system of recurrent drunk driving prevention.

1. Bedina I.A. Osobennosti psikhicheskikh rasstroistv u zhenshchin, podvergshikhsya vozdeistviyu stressa, vyzvannogo terroristicheskim aktom (kliniko-sotsial’nye aspekty). Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk. Moskow, 2008. (In Russ.).
2. Bedina I.A., Shport S.V. Psikhicheskie rasstroistva u zhenshchin v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh. V knige: Psikhiatriya chrezvychainykh situatsii. Rukovodstvo: V 2 t. Moscow: FGBU “GNTsSSP im. V.P. Serbskogo” Publ., 2011, pp. 234—247. (In Russ.).
3. Burtsev A.A. Problemy kompleksnoi preventsii upravleniya transportnym sredstvom v sostoyanii op’yaneniya: organizatsionno-pravovye, meditsinskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie aspekty [Comprehensive prevention issues of impaired driving:organizational, legal, medical and socio-psychological aspects] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 98—107. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090409 (In Russ.).
4. Burtsev A.A., Bakanov K.S., Bedina I.A. Obzor mirovogo opyta dopuska k upravleniyu transportnymi sredstvami (Germaniya) [A review of international experience of the admission to driving vehicles (Federal Republic of Germany)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Narkologiya = Narcology, 2020. Vol.19, no. 4, pp. 56—67. doi:10.25557/1682-8313.2020.04.56-67 (In Russ.).
5. Burtsev A.A., Bakanov K.S., Bedina I.A. Obzor mirovogo opyta dopuska k upravleniyu transportnymi sredstvami (Ispaniya, Khorvatiya) [A review of international experience of the admission to driving vehicles (Kingdom of Spain, Republic of Croatia)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Narkologiya= Narcology, 2020. Vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 56—63. doi:10.25557/1682-8313.2020.08.56-63 (In Russ.).
6. Burtsev A.A., Bakanov K.S., Bedina I.A. Obzor mirovogo opyta dopuska k upravleniyu transportnymi sredstvami (Finlyandiya, Kitai, Belarus’) [A review of international experience of the admission to driving vehicles (Finland, China, Belarus)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Narkologiya = Narcology, 2020. Vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 80—88. doi:10.25557/1682-8313.2020.12.80-88. (In Russ.).
7. Burtsev A.A., Bakanov K.S., Bedina I.A. Obzor mirovogo opyta dopuska k upravleniyu transportnymi sredstvami (Shveitsariya, SShA) [A review of international experience of the admission to driving vehicles (Switzerland, The United States of America)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Narkologiya = Narcology, 2020. Vol., no. 11, pp. 91—102. doi:10.25557/1682-8313.2020.11.91-102 (In Russ.).
8. Kochetova T.V. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “Psikhologiya dorozhnogo dvizheniya: voprosy teorii i praktiki” [The International Scientific-Practical Conference “Traffic Psychology:Theory and Practice”] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2017. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 160—163. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080212 (In Russ.).
9. Makeeva S.A., Kochetova T.V. Mezhdistsiplinarnaya model’ podderzhki i sodeistviya razvitiya “kompetentsii mobil’nosti” v Evrope [An interdisciplinary model to support and promote the development of “mobility competence” in Europe] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya= Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2017. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 38—43. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2017060105 (In Russ.).
10. Plotnikova M.A. Praktiko-orientirovannye issledovaniya psikhologii dorozhnogo dvizheniya (po materialam zarubezhnykh publikatsii) [Practice-oriented researches in the field of Traffic Psychology (according to foreign publications] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 108—118. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090410 (In Russ.).
11. Svedeniya o pokazatelyakh sostoyaniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]. Pokazateli sostoyaniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. Available at: http://stat.gibdd.ru (Accessed 25.12.2020).
12.  Strategiya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2018—2024 gody [Elektronnyi resurs]. Pravitel’stvo Rossii = The Russian Government. Available at: http://government.ru/docs/31102/ (Accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russ.).
13. Alonso F., Pastor J., Montoro L., Esteban C. Driving under the influence of alcohol: frequency, reasons, perceived risk and punishment [Elektronnyi resurs]. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy, 2015. Mar 12;10:11. doi:10.1186/s13011-015-0007-4
14. Brenner-Hartmann Ju. et al. Assessment of personal resources for safe driving: the principles of medical psychological assessment in Germany. Bonn: Kirschbaum Verlag GmbH, 2014. 100 p.
15. Bjerre B, Laurell H. The Swedish Alcohol Ignition Interlock Programme. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety ‐ T2000. Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
16. Carroll K.M., Kiluk B.D. Cognitive behavioral interventions for alcohol and drug use disorders: Through the stage model and back again [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychol. Addict. Behav, 2017. Vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 847—861. doi:10.1037/adb0000311
17. Corbett Cl. The penalty points (demerit) system in the UK and Ireland. Fit to Drive: 4th International Traffic Expert Congress Tallinn. Bonn, 2009, pp. 61—63.
18.  Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verkehrspsychologie. Evrope [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://www.dgvp-verkehrspsychologie.de/ (Accessed 14.12.2020).
19. De Young D.J. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California [Elektronnyi resurs]. Addiction, 1997. Vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 989—997. doi:10.1111/J.1360-0443.1997.TB02978.X
20. Distefano G., Hohman M. The Paradigm Developmental Model of Treatment. The Paradigm Developmental Model of Treatment [Elektronnyi resurs]. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 2007. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 133—147. doi:10.1300/J020v25n03_10
21. Fillmore M.T., Dyke N. van. DUI offenders display reduced perception of intoxication and heightened impulsive choice in response to alcohol [Elektronnyi resurs]. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2019. Jul 8;10.1037/pha0000311. doi:10.1037/pha0000311
22. International commission for driver testing CIECA [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://www.cieca.eu/ (Accessed 14.01.2021).
23. Meinhard G. “Klare Sicht…!?”, Evaluation der Wirksamkeit eines primärpräventiven Programmes zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit: Dissertation [Elektronnyi resurs]. Bonn, 2019. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-55895 (Accessed 14.12.2020).
24. Michon J. A critical review of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. New York: Plenum Press, 1985. P. 475—524.
25. Reilly K., Woodruff S., Hohman M., Barker M. Gender differences in driving under the influence (DUI) program client characteristics: Implications for treatment delivery [Elektronnyi resurs]. Women Health. 2019. Vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 132—144. doi:10.1080/03630242.2018.1434589
26. Tornowsky A., Luczak A. Fitted personality — beyond the traits. The proceedings of the 8th Fit to Drive International Traffic Experts Congress, Warsaw, May 8-9, 2014. Bonn: Kirschbaum Verlag, 2014, pp. 16—18.