Decision-Making on the Choice of a Way to Respond to Conflict Situations in Persons with Affective Disorders

In order to research the relationship between individual psychological characteristics and the decision-making process in the perception of acute conflict situations in persons with affective disorders, an empirical study was conducted. 39 people aged 19 to 55 years (M=24, SD=10.3) were examined, of which 67% were females. The main group consisted of persons with affective disorders (N=11), the comparison group were mentally healthy. The research looked into volitional, intellectual regulation and the choice of the method of reaction after the subjects were presented some video recordings of single and long-term acute conflict situations, as well as neutral situations. The diagnostic complex included: methods of “Verbal-color interference”, “Comparison of similar patterns”, questionnaires “Style of self-regulation of behavior”, “Methods of coping behavior”, “Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire”, “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” (HADS). The stylistic features of decision-making, self-regulation of behavior and ways of coping behavior in persons with affective disorders were highlighted. It was revealed that people with affective disorders tend to make impulsive decisions, prefer avoidance strategies and confrontation in acute conflict situations. Specific changes of volitional and intellectual regulation in persons with affective disorders depending on the presented situation are shown. It was concluded that in persons with affective disorders, the speed of choosing a response method is associated with the stylistic features of decision–making. The rigidity of cognitive style is associated with the stylistic features of self-regulation of behavior and coping behavior.

1. Arutyunova K.R. Psikhofiziologicheskii analiz zakonomernostei aktualizatsii individual’nogo opyta pri moral’noi otsenke deistvii: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Moscow: Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bardenshtein L.M., Mozhginskiy Yu.B. Patologicheskoe geteroagressivnoe povedenie u podrostkov. Moscow: OOO “Zerkalo M”, 2002. (In Russ.).
3. Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta. 2 ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 544 p. (In Russ.).
4. Indina T.A. Regulyatorno-lichnostnye mekhanizmy prinyatiya reshenii v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh [Regulation personality mechanisms of decision making in emergency situations]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2010, no. 124, pp. 336–347. (In Russ.).
5. Karabanov A.P. Sovremennye napravleniya issledovaniya affektivnykh mekhanizmov prinyatiya reshenii [Modern trends in the study of affective mechanisms of decision-making]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie” = RSUH / RGGU Bulletin. “Psychology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, 2017, no. 3 (9), pp. 167–182. (In Russ.).
6. Klyucharev V.A., Shmids A., Shestakova A.N. Neiroekonomika: neirobiologiya prinyatiya reshenii [Neuroeconomics: the neurobiology of decision-making] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2011. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 14–35. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/exp/2011/n2/41980.shtml (Accessed 14.03.2022). (In Russ.).
7. Kozeletskii Yu. Chelovek mnogomernyi: Psikhologicheskoe esse. Kiev: Lybid’, 1991. 285 p. (In Russ.).
8. Konopkin O.A. Osoznannaya samoregulyatsiya kak kriterii sub”ektnosti [Conscious self-regulation as a criterion of subjectness]. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy psikhologii, 2008, no. 3, pp. 22–34. (In Russ.).
9. Korzun D.N., Tkachenko A.A. Psikhopatologicheskie mekhanizmy prinyatiya yuridicheski znachimykh reshenii [Psychopathological mechanisms of making legally valid decisions] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2013, no. 2, pp. 11–19. doi:10.24411/1560-957X-2013-11317 (In Russ.).
10. Kornilova T.V., Tikhomirov O.K. Prinyatie intellektual’nykh reshenii v dialoge s komp’yuterom. Moscow: MGU Publ., 1990. 192 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kudryashova V.Yu., Saraikin D.M., Ivanov M.V. Koping-strategii i samoregulyatsiya povedeniya u bol’nykh shizofreniei i affektivnymi rasstroistvami [Copings and self-regulation of behavior in patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva = V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, 2017, no. 2, pp. 33–39. (In Russ.).
12. Kuznetsova S.O., Abramova A.A., Enikolopov S.N., Razumova A.V. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti vrazhdebnosti u bol’nykh s shizofreniei, shizoaffektivnymi i affektivnymi rasstroistvami [Psychological characteristics of hostility in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective and affective disorders]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2014, no. 3, pp. 92–103. (In Russ.).
13. Leontiev D.A. Ovchinnikova E.Yu. Rasskazova E.I. Fam A.Kh. Psikhologiya vybora. Moscow: Smysl, 2019. (In Russ.).
14. Leontiev D.A. Problema vybora v naukakh o cheloveke: ot ratsional’nykh modelei k ekzistentsial’nym. Chelovek pered vyborom v sovremennom mire: problemy, vozmozhnosti, resheniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf., 27—28 okt. 2015 g., IF RAN: V 3 t. T. 1. Moscow: Nauchnaya mysl’, 2015, pp. 18–33. (In Russ.).
15. Lysenko N.E., Bulygina V.G. Problema issledovaniya prinyatiya reshenii u lits, sovershivshikh obshchestvenno opasnye deistviya v konfliktnykh situatsiyakh [The problem of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2021, no. 3, pp. 56–66. doi:10.47877/1560-957X-2021-10306 (In Russ.).
16. Padun M.A. Kognitivnyi stil’ i depressiya [Cognitive Style and Depression] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2009. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 81–90. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/exp/2009/n4/26609.shtml (Accessed 11.02.2022). (In Russ.).
17. Pluzhnikov I.V. Narusheniya emotsional’nogo intellekta pri rasstroistvakh affektivnogo spektra i shizofrenii [Emotional intelligence impairments in affective spectrum disorders and schizophrenia]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2009, no. 329, pp. 211–213. (In Russ.).
18. Solntseva G.N., Smolyan G.L. Prinyatie reshenii v situatsii neopredelennosti i riska (psikhologicheskii aspekt). Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza RAN. Tom 41. 2009, pp. 266–280. (In Russ.).
19. Chumakova M.A. Lichnostnye predposylki ratsional’nogo vybora v usloviyakh neopredelennosti: Avtoref. diss. kan. psikhol. nauk. Moscow, 2010. 31 p. (In Russ.).
20. Yatsyk G.G., Vorobyeva E.V. Sovremennye psikhofiziologicheskie issledovaniya resheniya kognitivnykh zadach v usloviyakh stressa [Modern psychophysiological studies of solving cognitive tasks in the stress state]. Severo-Kavkazskii psikhologicheskii vestnik = North-Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 2017, no. 15/2, pp. 39–49. (In Russ.).
21. Fazel S., Wolf A., Chang Zh., Larsson H., Goodwin G.M., Lichtenstein P. Depression and violence: a Swedish population study. The Lancet, 2015. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 224–232. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00128-X
22. Fazel S., Lichtenstein P., Grann M., Goodwin G.M., Långström N. Bipolar Disorder and Violent Crime: New Evidence from Population-Based Longitudinal Studies and Systematic Review. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2010. Vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 931–938. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.97
23. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 512 p.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 1979. Vol. XVLII, pp. 263–291.
25. Simon H.A. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. Richard T. Ely Lecture. American Economic Review, 1978. Vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1—16.
26. Srikumar M.A., Gruber-Baldini A.L., Richard J.H. Relationship between aggressive behaviors and depression among nursing home residents with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2001. Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 139–146. doi:10.1002/1099-1166(200102)16:2<139::aid-gps284>3.0.co;2-5
27. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 1974, Vol. 185, pp. 1124–1131.