Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 9, no. 2)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Clinical Psychology and Special Education

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (online): 2304-0394

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2012

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Neuropsychological Assessment: an overview of modern tendencies (dedicated to 110-th anniversary of A.R. Luria) 10018

Akhutina T.V.
Doctor of Psychology, leading research assistant of the laboratory of neuropsychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: akhutina@mail.ru

Melikyan Z.A.
Moscow State University named after M.V.Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: zmelikyan@yahoo.com

Abstract
Current contribution considers different approaches to neuropsychological testing in western (primarily North-American) tradition. The article compares Lurian qualitative approach to the assessment of cognitive disorders in patients and popular western approaches such as Psychometric approach, Localizational approach, Cognitive approaches, Flexible approach to tests selection, and Boston process approach. Special attention is paid to Ecological approach, in particular, a ranked list of most popular ecological tests is provided. The article presents results of surveys among clinical psychologists from the USA and Canada concerning their most preferred neuropsychological tests, a list of five most popular tests for each cognitive domain is provided. Since surveys of popularity of psychological tests among psychologists in the USA and Canada are done regularly between 1980 and 2012, analysis of this data allows to see the dynamics of tests selection within the last 30 years.

Keywords: neuropsychological assessment, qualitative and quantitative approaches to the assessment, western neuropsychological tests, ecologically oriented tests

Column: Theoretical research

For Reference

References
  1. Bateman А., Wilson B.A., Evans J.J., Gracey F. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Theory, Models, Therapy and Outcome. Cambridge University Press (1st Edition), 2009.
  2. Butler M., Retzlaff P., Vanderploeg R. Neuropsychological test usage. – Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1991, Vol. 22, No. 6. – P. 510-512.
  3. Golden C.J. Manual for the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. Children Revision. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1981.
  4. Golden C.J., Hammeke T.A., Purish A.D. Manual for the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1980.
  5. Kaplan E. A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement and practice. The master lecture series, Vol. 7. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1988. Р. 125-167.
  6. Kaufman A.S. & Kaufman N. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Interpretive Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1983.
  7. Korkman M., Kirk U., & Kemp S. NEPSY. A developmental neuropsychological assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1997.
  8. Milberg W. P., Hebben N., Kaplan E. The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment. // I. Grant, K. M. Adams (Eds): Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders.  NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. P. 65-86.
  9. Rabin, L., Barr, W.B., Spadaccini, A.T., Charcape, M.M., & Barr, W.B., (2012, February). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the U.S. and Canada: A 10-year follow-up survey. To be presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Montreal, Canada.
  10. Rabin L.A., Barr W.B., Burton L.A. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. – Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005. – Vol.20.
  11. Rabin L.A., Burton L.A., Barr W.B. Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical neuropsychologists – The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2007. – Vol.21.
  12. Robertson I.H., Ward T., Ridgeway A., Nimmo-Smith I. Test of Everyday Attention, The (TEA). Pearson. 1994.
  13. Shiel A., Wilson B.A., McLellan L., Horn S., Watson M. Wessex Head Injury Matrix, The (WHIM). Pearson. 2000.
  14. Tremont G., Westervelt H.J., Javorsky D.J., Podolanczuk A., Stern R.A. Referring physicians’ perceptions of the neuropsychological evaluation: how are we doing? – The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2002, Vol. 16, No. 4.
  15. Wayne J.C., Nathan J.S., Puente A.E. Psychological test usage: implications in professional psychology. – Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2000. – Vol. 31 (2).
  16. Wilson B.A., Greenfield E., Clare L., Baddely A. et al. Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test  –Third Edition. L.: Pearson. 2008.
  17. Wilson B.A., Alderman N., Burgess P.W., Emslie H. and Evans J.J. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Pearson. 1996.

 

 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????