Diagnostic Value of the

Khokhlov N.A.
PhD in Psychology, Developer Psychologist, Scientific and Methodical Department, Centre for Testing and Development “Gumanitarnye Tekhnologii”, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-7547
e-mail: nkhokhlov@psychmsu.ru

Fyodorova E.D.
Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-6894
e-mail: elenaf1998@yandex.ru

Zhalnina A.D.
Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-8536
e-mail: sasha@cms.ru

Maslova K.E.
Student, Department of Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-1845
e-mail: maslowxen@ya.ru

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english

The method of "Table Drawing" is used in child neuropsychology to evaluate projective representations. At the same time, a unified system for assessing the technique performance, age standards, and information about the validity are absent. The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the technique during the neuropsychological examination of children aged 4–17 years. A survey of 636 persons was conducted, 411 of them boys and 225 girls. The overall technique performance was evaluated in the diagnostic process. Regardless of the diagnostician, the drawings were evaluated by the level of projective representations and the geometric properties. Age standards of technique execution were obtained. Based on the material of 597 diagnostic protocols, the contribution of the state of 14 higher mental functions and psychological characteristics to the success of the test performance was studied. Constructive-spatial functions have the greatest weight; however, the efficiency also depends on visual gnosis, dynamic praxis, and thinking. The diagnostic value of the method is different at different ages, so neuropsychological interpretation of its execution results should depend on the age of the subject.

Keywords: developmental neuropsychology, quantitative methods in neuropsychology, age-stratified scores, visual-spatial functions, projective representations

Column: Methods and techniques

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2021100214

For Reference

Khokhlov N.A., Fyodorova E.D., Zhalnina A.D., Maslova K.E. Diagnostic Value of the "Table Drawing" Technique during Neuropsychological Assessment of Children Aged 4–17 Years [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 253–270. doi:10.17759/cpse.2021100214. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Aristova I.L., Esipenko E.A., Sharafieva K.R. et al. Prostranstvennye sposobnosti: struktura i etiologiya [Modern approaches in the study of spatial abilities: a structure and etiology of individual differences]. Voprosy psikhologii=Psychology Issues, 2018, no. 1,
pp. 118–126. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
Vizel' T.G., Shabetnik O.I. Narusheniya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii i ikh vosstanovlenie pri porazheniyakh pravogo polushariya mozga [Disorders of higher mental functions and their rehabilitation in lesions of the right hemisphere of the brain]. Moscow: V. Sekachev, 2018. 102 p. (In Russ.).
Glozman Zh.M. Neiropsikhologicheskoe obsledovanie: kachestvennaya i kolichestvennaya otsenka dannykh [Neuropsychological examination: qualitative and quantitative assessment of data]. Moscow: Smysl, 2012. 264 p. (In Russ.).
Glozman Zh.M. Neiropsikhologiya detskogo vozrasta [The neuropsychology of childhood]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.).
Kolesnikova G.I. Metodologiya psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovanii [Methodology of psychological and pedagogical research]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2015. 318 p. (In Russ.).
Korsakova N.K., Mikadze Yu.V., Balashova E.Yu. Neuspevayushchie deti: neiropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika mladshikh shkol'nikov [Unsuccessful children: neuropsychological diagnostics of younger schoolchildren], 3rd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Yurait, 2017. 156 p. (In Russ.).
Manelis N.G. Razvitie optiko-prostranstvennykh funktsii v ontogeneze [Development of optical-spatial functions in ontogenesis]. Shkola zdorov'ya=School of Health, 1997, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 25–37. (In Russ.).
Metody neiropsikhologicheskogo obsledovaniya detei 6–9 let [Methods of neuropsychological examination of 6–9 years children]. T.V. Akhutina (ed.). Moscow:
V. Sekachev, 2016. 280 p. (In Russ.).
Mikadze Yu.V. Neiropsikhologiya detskogo vozrasta [Childhood neuropsychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2013. 288 p. (In Russ.).
Polonskaya N.N. Neiropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika detei mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta [Neuropsychological diagnostics of children of primary school age]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2007. 192 p. (In Russ.).
Semenovich A.V. Vvedenie v neiropsikhologiyu detskogo vozrasta [Introduction to the neuropsychology of childhood], 3rd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Genezis, 2013. 319 p. (In Russ.).
Khokhlov N.A. Neiropsikhologicheskii podkhod k otsenke sposobnostei u detei i podrostkov [Neuropsychological approach to assessment of abilities in children and teenagers]. In V.A. Mazilov (ed.), Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Psikhologiya sposobnostei i odarennosti=Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference Psychology of Abilities and Giftedness. Yaroslavl': Publ. RIO YaGPU, 2019, pp. 233–236. (In Russ.).
Anderson Jr.R.M. Practitioner’s guide to clinical neuropsychology. Boston, MA: Springer, 1994. 393 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2480-9
Feifer S.G., De Fina P.A. The Neuropsychology of mathematics: Diagnosis and intervention workbook. Middletown, MD: School Neuropsych Press, 2005. 196 p.
Lezak M.D., Howieson D.B., Bigler E.D., et al. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. NY: Oxford University Press, 2012. 1200 p.
Lin C.-L., Wang M.-J.J., Kang Y.Y. The evaluation of visuospatial performance between screen and paper. Displays, 2015, vol. 39, pp. 26–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2015. 08.002
Malanchini M., Rimfeld K., Shakeshaft N.G. et al. Evidence for a unitary structure of spatial cognition beyond general intelligence. npj Science of Learning, 2020, vol. 5, 9. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-020-0067-8
Manning L. Assessment and treatment of disorders of visuospatial, imaginal, and constructional processes. In Gurd J.M., Kischka U., Marshall J.C. (eds.), The Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2nd ed. NY: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 202–215. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234110.003.11
Schmetz E., Rousselle L., Ballaz C. et al. The BEVPS: A new test battery to assess visual perceptual and spatial processing abilities in 5–14 year-old children. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 2018, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 317–333. DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2017. 1336710
Van den Berg E., Ruis C. Space in Neuropsychological Assessment. In A. Postma, I.J.M. van der Ham (eds.), Neuropsychology of Space: Spatial Functions of the Human Brain. London: Academic Press, 2017, pp. 361–378. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801638-1.00010-0