|
|
Diagnostic Value of the "Table Drawing" Technique during Neuropsychological Assessment of Children Aged 4–17 Years 404
Khokhlov N.A.
PhD in Psychology, Developer Psychologist, Scientific and Methodical Department, Centre for Testing and Development “Gumanitarnye Tekhnologii”, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-7547
e-mail: nkhokhlov@psychmsu.ru Fyodorova E.D.
Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-6894
e-mail: elenaf1998@yandex.ru Zhalnina A.D.
Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-8536
e-mail: sasha@cms.ru Maslova K.E.
Student, Department of Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-1845
e-mail: maslowxen@ya.ru
The method of "Table Drawing" is used in child neuropsychology to evaluate projective representations. At the same time, a unified system for assessing the technique performance, age standards, and information about the validity are absent. The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the technique during the neuropsychological examination of children aged 4–17 years. A survey of 636 persons was conducted, 411 of them boys and 225 girls. The overall technique performance was evaluated in the diagnostic process. Regardless of the diagnostician, the drawings were evaluated by the level of projective representations and the geometric properties. Age standards of technique execution were obtained. Based on the material of 597 diagnostic protocols, the contribution of the state of 14 higher mental functions and psychological characteristics to the success of the test performance was studied. Constructive-spatial functions have the greatest weight; however, the efficiency also depends on visual gnosis, dynamic praxis, and thinking. The diagnostic value of the method is different at different ages, so neuropsychological interpretation of its execution results should depend on the age of the subject.
-
Aristova I.L., Esipenko E.A., Sharafieva K.R. et al.
Prostranstvennye sposobnosti: struktura i etiologiya [Modern approaches in the
study of spatial abilities: a structure and etiology of individual
differences]. Voprosy psikhologii=Psychology Issues, 2018, no. 1,
pp. 118–126. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
-
Vizel' T.G., Shabetnik O.I. Narusheniya vysshikh
psikhicheskikh funktsii i ikh vosstanovlenie pri porazheniyakh pravogo
polushariya mozga [Disorders of higher mental functions and their
rehabilitation in lesions of the right hemisphere of the brain]. Moscow: V.
Sekachev, 2018. 102 p. (In Russ.).
-
Glozman Zh.M. Neiropsikhologicheskoe obsledovanie:
kachestvennaya i kolichestvennaya otsenka dannykh [Neuropsychological
examination: qualitative and quantitative assessment of data]. Moscow: Smysl,
2012. 264 p. (In Russ.).
-
Glozman Zh.M. Neiropsikhologiya detskogo vozrasta [The
neuropsychology of childhood]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2009. 272 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Kolesnikova G.I. Metodologiya psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh
issledovanii [Methodology of psychological and pedagogical research].
Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2015. 318 p. (In Russ.).
-
Korsakova N.K., Mikadze Yu.V., Balashova E.Yu.
Neuspevayushchie deti: neiropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika mladshikh
shkol'nikov [Unsuccessful children: neuropsychological diagnostics of younger
schoolchildren], 3rd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Yurait, 2017. 156 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Manelis N.G. Razvitie optiko-prostranstvennykh funktsii v
ontogeneze [Development of optical-spatial functions in ontogenesis]. Shkola
zdorov'ya=School of Health, 1997, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 25–37. (In
Russ.).
-
Metody neiropsikhologicheskogo obsledovaniya detei 6–9 let
[Methods of neuropsychological examination of 6–9 years children]. T.V.
Akhutina (ed.). Moscow:
V. Sekachev, 2016. 280 p. (In Russ.).
-
Mikadze Yu.V. Neiropsikhologiya detskogo vozrasta
[Childhood neuropsychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2013. 288 p. (In
Russ.).
-
Polonskaya N.N. Neiropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika detei
mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta [Neuropsychological diagnostics of children of
primary school age]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2007. 192 p. (In Russ.).
-
Semenovich A.V. Vvedenie v neiropsikhologiyu detskogo
vozrasta [Introduction to the neuropsychology of childhood], 3rd ed., rev. and
add. Moscow: Genezis, 2013. 319 p. (In Russ.).
-
Khokhlov N.A. Neiropsikhologicheskii podkhod k otsenke
sposobnostei u detei i podrostkov [Neuropsychological approach to assessment of
abilities in children and teenagers]. In V.A. Mazilov (ed.), Materialy
Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Psikhologiya sposobnostei i
odarennosti=Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference
Psychology of Abilities and Giftedness. Yaroslavl': Publ. RIO YaGPU, 2019,
pp. 233–236. (In Russ.).
-
Anderson Jr.R.M. Practitioner’s guide to clinical
neuropsychology. Boston, MA: Springer, 1994. 393 p. DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4615-2480-9
-
Feifer S.G., De Fina P.A. The Neuropsychology of
mathematics: Diagnosis and intervention workbook. Middletown, MD: School
Neuropsych Press, 2005. 196 p.
-
Lezak M.D., Howieson D.B., Bigler E.D., et al.
Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. NY: Oxford University Press, 2012. 1200
p.
-
Lin C.-L., Wang M.-J.J., Kang Y.Y. The evaluation of
visuospatial performance between screen and paper. Displays, 2015, vol.
39, pp. 26–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2015. 08.002
-
Malanchini M., Rimfeld K., Shakeshaft N.G. et al. Evidence
for a unitary structure of spatial cognition beyond general intelligence.
npj Science of Learning, 2020, vol. 5, 9. DOI:
10.1038/s41539-020-0067-8
-
Manning L. Assessment and treatment of disorders of
visuospatial, imaginal, and constructional processes. In Gurd J.M., Kischka U.,
Marshall J.C. (eds.), The Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2nd ed.
NY: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 202–215. DOI:
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234110.003.11
-
Schmetz E., Rousselle L., Ballaz C. et al. The BEVPS: A
new test battery to assess visual perceptual and spatial processing abilities
in 5–14 year-old children. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 2018, vol. 7,
no. 4, pp. 317–333. DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2017. 1336710
-
Van den Berg E., Ruis C. Space in Neuropsychological
Assessment. In A. Postma, I.J.M. van der Ham (eds.), Neuropsychology of
Space: Spatial Functions of the Human Brain. London: Academic Press, 2017,
pp. 361–378. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801638-1.00010-0
|
|
