Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 4)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Prevailing Perceptions of Masculine and Feminine Aggression 1922
The article describes a number of tendencies related to understanding masculine and feminine aggression and its level. In particular, review of literature shows the following: 1) identification of masculine aggression as direct, often taking form of physical acts, and the feminine - as verbal or indirect, which can manifest, for example, in form of exclusion from a social group; 2) definition of the aggressiveness level among men as the highest in comparison with women. The aim of the research presented in the article was to examine to what extent such identification prevails in perceptions of aggression and aggressiveness among citizens of Russia and neighboring countries, for which purpose a corresponding questionnaire was developed. 541 persons aged from 12 to 81 took part in the survey carried out by the authors. Its results showed that 86,5% of all respondents agreed that there is a difference between masculine and feminine aggression. It is noted that while describing the mentioned difference, 66% of respondents used the criterion of physical aggressive acts for men and indirect and/or verbal aggression for women. 3,9% of respondents mentioned only the former, 9.8% – only the latter. It is also shown that more than 58,4% of men consider themselves more aggressive than women, and 48,5% of women share their opinion. The contrary point of view is shared by 27,7% of women and 16,2% of men. About a quarter of respondents consider masculine and feminine aggressiveness equal (23,8% of women – 25.3% of men). Based on the received data conclusions are made that the respondents recognize a difference between masculine and feminine aggression and existence of gender specifics in description and evaluation of its particular qualities.
Keywords: aggression, aggressiveness, masculine aggression, feminine aggression, physical aggression, verbal aggression, indirect aggression, population survey
Column: Juridical Psychology
Berkovic L. Agressija. Prichiny, posledstvija,
kontrol'. SPb., 2007.
Bol'shoj psihologicheskij slovar' / Sost. B. Mesherjakov,
V. Zinchenko. M., 2004.
Burn Sh. M. Gendernaja psihologija. M., 2008.
Enikolopov S. N. Ponjatie agressii v sovremennoj
psihologii // Prikladnaja psihologija. 2001. № 1.
Zhmurov D. V. Slovar' terminov agressii.
Еlektronnaja versija: http://www.vocabulum.ru/author/
Ivanova E. A. Gendernye razlichija v projavlenii
agressivnosti u detej podrostkovogo vozrasta // Sibirskij psihologicheskij
zhurnal. 2005. № 21.
Il'in E. P. Differencial'naja psihofiziologija
muzhchiny i zhenshiny. SPb., 2003.
Springer S., Dejch G. Levyj mozg, pravyj mozg.
Asimmetrija mozga. M., 1983.
Sherbinina Ju. V. Verbal'naja agressija. M.,
Abbott A. Testosterone link to aggression may be
all in the mind, December 8. Электронная версия:
Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between
heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review // Psychological Bulletin. 2000.
Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in
realworld settings: A meta-analytic review // Review of General Psychology.
Archer J. Cross-cultural differences in physi-cal
aggression between partners: A social-role analysis // Personality and Social
Psychology Review. 2006. 10(2).
Bennett, Farrington, Huesmann. Explaining gender
differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills //
Aggression and Violent Behavior. March-April 2005. Vol. 10. Issue 3.
Björkqvist K. Sex differences in
physical, verbal and indirect aggression: a review of recent research // Sex
Roles: A Journal of Research. 1994. Feb. Электронная версия:
Kaukiainen. Social intelligence − empathy = aggression? // Aggression and
Violent Behavior. March-April 2000. Vol. 5. Issue 2.
Brambilla F., Speca A., Pacchiarotti I., Biondi M.
Hormonal background of physiological aggressiveness in psychologically healthy
women // International Journal of Psychophysiology. March 2010. Vol. 75. Issue
Coie J. D. & Dodge K. A. Aggression and
antisocial behavior. In: W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds) // Handbook of Child
Psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development, 1997.
Dutton Donald G., Tonia L. Nicholls. The gender
paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1: The conflict of
theory and data // Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2005. 10(6).
Eagly A. H., Steffen V. J. Gender and aggressive
behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature //
Psychological Bulletin. 1986. 100(3).
Gray P. B., Parkin J. C., Samms-Vaughan M. E.
Hormonal correlates of human paternal interactions: A hospital-based
investigation in urban Jamaica // Hormones and Behavior. November 2007. Vol.
52. Issue 4.
Gray P. B., Peter T. Ellison, and Benjamin C.
Campbel. Testosterone and Marriage among Ariaal Men of Northern Kenya //
Current Anthropology. Oct. 2007. Vol. 48. Issue 5.
Josephs R. Stress Hormone Blocks Testosterone’s
Effects, Study Shows. 2010. Sept. 27. Электронная версия:
Levy J. Lateral Differences in the Human Brain in
Cognition and Behavioral Control. In: Cerebral Correlates of Conscious
Experience (ed.). P. Buser arid A. Rougeul-Buser, N. Y., North Holland
Publishing Co., 1978.
Liu Jianghong. Concept analysis: aggression //
Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2004. Vol. 25. № 7.
Maccoby E. E., Jacklin C. N. The psychology of sex
differences. Stanford, 1974.
Magdol Lynn et al. Gender differences in partner
violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical
and epidemiological approaches // Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology. 1997. 65(1).
Mims Ch. Strange but True: Testosterone Alone Does
Not Cause Violence. 2007. July 5. Электронная версия:
Pogun Sakire. Sex differences in brain and
behavior: emphasis on nicotine, nitric oxide and place learning //
International Journal of Psychophysiology. October 2001. Vol. 42. Issue
Waber D. Sex Differences In Cognition: A Function
of Maturation Rate? Science. 192. 1976.