Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 5)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Mediation in modern legal practice 2687
Shamlikashvili T.A.
Professor, Scientific and Academic Chair of the Federal Mediation Institute, Head of Chair of
Mediation in the Social Sphere, Department of Juridical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: office@mediacia.com
We provide the characteristic of the current state and trends of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system in Russia and abroad. We analyze the main features of current Russian legislation in the field of mediation. The necessity of integration of mediation in the Russian legal culture is proved. We propose measures of redefining the role of various representatives of the legal profession, designed to meet the challenges of time and provide legal assistance to citizens, using a wide range of possibilities for the resolution of the conflict, including the development of a mutually acceptable solution by the disputing parties that meets their interests. We separately consider the opportunities the mediation offers to judge, lawyer, notary and corporate lawyer. We describe a lawyer in the collaborative law process, (“mutual help law”) as a voluntary, structured, non- adversarial approach to resolving disputes based on cooperation of the parties themselves and their legal advisers.
Keywords: mediation, alternative dispute resolution, non-judicial method, conciliation, judicial system, legal community, jurisprudence, judge, lawyer, notary, corporate lawyer, teaching mediation, collaborative law
Column: Mediation
- Bernard K. Mehanizm, otlazhennyj za 20 let: Me- diacija v
Federal’nom apelljacionnom sude devjatogo federal’nogo okruga SShA [Mechanism
adjusted dur- ing 20 years: Mediation in Federal Appelative Court of the 9th
Federal District of the USA]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law],
2010, no. 2, pp. 48−54.
- Brook G. Navjazyvat’ mediaciju ne sleduet [Mediation should
not be imposed]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2009, no. 4, pp.
42−46.
- Dialog na dva dnja i na dva goroda: Reportazh konferencii "Mediacija kak
instrument sovershen- stvovanija pravovoj kul’tury" [Dialogue for two days and
two cities. Report from the conference “Media- tion as an instrument for
development of legal cul- ture”]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law],
2009, no. 4, pp. 34−37.
- Lack J. Chto takoe priemlemoe razreshenie sporov? Spektr gibridnyh
tehnik, dostupnyh sporjashhim storonam [What is appropriate dispute resolution?
The Spectrum of Hybrid Techniques Available to the Parties]. Mediacija i
pravo [Mediation and Law], 2013, no. 3, pp. 38−56.
- Sazonova M. V starinu govorili: "Notarius – jeto svetskij
svjashhennik". Interv’ju [In old times people said: "Notary is a secular
priest". Interview]. Me- diacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2010, no.
2, pp. 12−20.
- Otis L., Reiter E. Mediacija, provodimaja sud’jami: novoe javlenie v
transformacii pravosudija [Media- tion by Judges: A New Phenomenon in the
Transfor- mation of Justice]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law],
2011, no. 1−3, pp. 21−38.
- Ristin G. Eshhe ne vse razresheno: Al’ternativnoe razreshenie sporov
na urovne apelljacii [Not every- thing is allowed yet: Alternative Dispute
Resolution at appellate level]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law],
2010, no. 4, pp. 14−18.
- Snoo D. Vazhno sdelat’ mediaciju ser’eznoj professiej [It is
important to make mediation a serious job]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and
Law], 2009, no. 4, pp. 52−56.
- Trossen А. Put’ k sotrudnichestvu [A way to cooperation].
Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2013, no. 4, pp. 24−36.
- Welsh D. Nuzhen jeffektivnyj provajder i zainte- resovannyj
sporshhik [Efficient provider and interest- ed party are needed]. Mediacija
i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2009, no. 4, pp. 48−51.
- Tsur M. V Izraile mediacija uzhe stala chast’ju pravovogo
prostranstva [In Israel mediation has al- ready become a part of legal field].
Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2009, no. 4, pp. 58–60.
- Shamlikashvili T. А. Advokat uhodit iz suda: Chto takoe
collaborative law? [Attorney leaves the court: what is collaborative law?].
Mediacija i pravo [Media- tion and Law], 2009, no. 3, pp. 10–13.
- Shamlikashvili T. А. Zapreshhennaja fraza. Kogda advokat ne mozhet
skazat’: "My uvidimsja v sude" [Forbidden phrase. When lawyer cannot say: "See
you in court"]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2010, no. 1, pp.
64−69.
- Shamlikashvili T. А. Chto vosstanavlivaet vosstanovitel’noe
pravosudie? Dva vzgljada na problemu prestuplenija i nakazanija [What restores
restorative justice? Two views on the problem of crime and punishment].
Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2010, no. 3, pp. 22−30.
- Shamlikashvili T. А. Spora eshhe net, no put’ k vyhodu iz
konfrontacii uzhe namechen: Chto ta- koe Deal-making mediation, i kak
ee ispol’zovat’ na praktike? [There’s no dispute yet, but way out
of confrontation is already clear: What is deal-making mediation, and how it
can be used in practice?]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and Law], 2011,
no. 3, pp. 60–65.
- Shimac S. Juridicheskoe soobshhestvo pered vyzovom vremeni [Legal
community and challenges of the time]. Mediacija i pravo [Mediation and
Law], 2010, no. 3, pp. 54−68.
- Schonewille М., Fox C. Kakaja ugodno sdelka, negodnaja sdelka
ili voobshhe nikakoj sdelki... Nel’zja li sdelat’ luchshe? [Moving beyond
‘Just’ a Deal, a Bad Deal or No Deal]. Mediacija i pravo [Me- diation and
Law], 2012, no. 3, pp. 44−64.
|
|
