Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 4)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
The Use of Social Networks in Education and Socialization of Adolescents: an Analytical Review of Empirical Studies (International Experience) 2630
Analyst, Center “Research of modern childhood”, Postgraduate Student, Institute of Education, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia
We present a review of foreign studies on the use of social networks in teaching practice. We provide the description of social media as a potential new resource, providing the organization of teacher-student interaction, group communication of students, increasing the involvement of students in the learning process. It is shown that social networking services are relevant to the teenagers request: the pursuit of intimate-personal communication. For the review were selected publications about social networking in education over the past 3 years, satisfying the criteria of describing the details of empirical research. Comparative analysis showed that social media are used in two main ways: 1) as support and operationalization of existing forms of educational work, and 2) to development of the learning process. We confirmed the presence of the «digital gap» between students and teachers that is not in favor of the latter: the described positive results are associated with a wide variety of activities of students, and negative -with low technological literacy and higher workload of teachers.
- Gurkina O. A., Novikova E. M. Chem tak privlekatel’ny sotsial’nye seti dlya
podrostkov? [Elektronnyi resurs] [What is so attractive in the social network
for teenagers?]. Laboratoriya monitoringovykh issledovanii MGPPU
mgppu.rf [Laboratory of monitoring studies MGPPU], 2014. Available
at: http://xn--c1arkau.xn--p1ai/projectpages/index/202 (Accessed
- Kondrashkin A. V. Internet v razvitii sovremennykh podrostkov [Elektronnyi
resurs] [Internet in the development of modern teenagers].
Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie PSYEDU.ru [Psychological
Science and Education PSYEDU.ru], 2013, no. 2. Available at: www.psyedu.ru
/ ISSN: 2074-5885 (Accessed 10.10.2014) (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
- Soldatova G. U. Tsifrovaya kompetentnost’ podrostkov i roditelei.
Rezul’taty vserossiiskogo issledova niya [Digital competence of adolescents
and their parents. The results of nationwide research] Moscow: Fond Razvitiya
Internet [Internet Development Fund], 2013. 144 p.
- Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty obshchego
obrazovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Federal state educational standards of
general education]. Ministerstvo obrazovaniya RF eng.mon.gov.ru
[Ministry of Education Russian Federation eng.mon.gov.ru], 2014.
Available at: http://eng.mon.gov.ru/dokumenty/543 (Accessed: 10.10.2014)..
- Tsymbalenko S. B. Vliyanie Interneta na rossiiskikh podrostkov i
yunoshestvo v kontekste razvitiya rossiiskogo informatsionnogo prostranstva.
Reaul’taty sotsiologichegkogo issledovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Effect of
the Internet on Russian adolescents and young adults in the context of the
development of the Russian information space. The results of sociological
research]. Media. Informatsiya. Kommunikatsiya [Media. Information.
Communication], 2012. Available at:
http://lfrnic.rg.rufindex. phpf_new (Accessed 10.10.2014).
- El’konin D. B. K probleme periodizatsii psikhicheskogo razvitiya v detskom
vozraste: Izbrannye psikho-logicheskie Trudy [On the problem of periodization
of mental development in childhood: Selected psychological works]. Moscow,
1989. 560 p.
- Baker–Eveleth L., Sarker S., Eveleth D. M. Formation of an online
community of practice: An inductive study unearthing key elements.
Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences (Waikoloa, January 3-6, 2005), 2005. 254 p.
- Bauerlein M. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young
Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30).
Tarcher, 2009. 253 p.
- Boyd D. M., Ellison N. B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and
scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. Vol. 13,
no. 1, pp. 210–230.
- Bumgardner S., Knestis K. Social networking as a tool for student and
teacher learning. District Administration, 2011. Vol. 47, no. 5, pp.
- Buzzetto-More N. A. Social Networking in Undergraduate Education.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, Special
Section on Social Networking, Teaching, and Learning, 2012. Vol. 7, no.1,
- Calafiore P., Damianov D. S. The Effect of Time Spent Online on Student
Achievement in Online Economics and Finance Courses. Journal of Economic
Education, 2011. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 209–223.
- Cardona-Divale M. The dissertation: Student interaction and community
building: an evaluation of social networking in online learning environments.
ProQuest LLC, 2012, Publication number 3505771. 100 p.
- Carr N. Is Google Making us Stupid? What the Internet is Doing to our
Brains. The Atlantic Monthly. Available at: www.thea tlantic.com/magazine/
archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868. (Accessed 10.10.2014).
- EU Kids Online: Final report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online (EC
Safer Internet Plus Programme Deliverable D 6.5),
2009. 50 p.
- Falahaha, Rosmalab D. Study of Social Networking Usage in Higher Education
- Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. Vol. 67, pp.
- Grossecka G., Branb R., Tiruc L. Dear teacher, what should I write
on my wall? A case study on academic uses of Facebook. University of the
- Timisoara, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, 2013. 23 p.
- Herring S. C. Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism
in Adult Construction of online youth identity. Youth, Identity, and Digital
Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007, pp. 70–92.
- Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. The evolution of the digital divide: examining
the relationship of race to internet access and usage over time. Book. The
digital divide MIT Press Cambridge, 2001, pp. 47–97.
- Jones C. Shao B. The net generation and digital natives:
Implications for higher education. Higher Education Academy, York, 2011,
- Junco R. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between
multiple indices of Face-book use and academic performance. Computers in
Human Behavior, 2012. Vol. 28. 64 p.
- Kirschner P. A. Karpinski A. C. Facebook and academic performance.
Computers in Human Behavior, 2010. Vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 237–1245
- Krasilnikov A. A., Semenova M. Do Social Networks Help to Improve
Student Academic Performance? The Case of Vk .com and Russian Students.
Economics Bulletin, 2014. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp.
- Luttrell R. Social networking sites in the public relations
classroom: a mixed methods analysis of undergraduate learning outcomes using
wordpress, facebook, and twitter. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of
the California Institute of Integral Studies, 2012. 78 p.
- Madge C., Meek J., Wellens J. Hooley T. Face-book, social integration and
informal learning at university: It is more for socia lising and talking to
friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and
Technology, 2009. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 141–155.
- Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon,
2011. Vol. 9, no. 5. 56 p.
- Pew Internet & American Life Project’s. URL: http://
www.pewinternet.org (Accessed 10.10.2014) Shih R. C. Can Web 2.0
technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integra ting
Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. In J. Waycott (eds.)
Assessing students’ Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 2011. Vol. 27, no . 5, pp. 829–845.
- Thurlow C. From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive
Construction in Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print
Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006 . Vol. 11, no.
3, pp. 667–701.
- Tower S., Latimer S., Hewit J. Social networking as a learning tool:
Nursing students’ percept ion of efficacy. Nurse Education Today, 2014.
Vol. 34, no.1, pp. 1012–1017.
- VanDoorn G., Eklund A. Face to Facebook: Social media and the
learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, synchronous communication.
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2013. Vol. 10.
Issue 1. Article 6. 120 p.
- Wasko M., Faraj S., Teigland R. Collective action and knowledge
contribution in electronic networks of practice. Journal of the Association
for Information Systems, 2004. Vol. 11, no. 1. 76 p.
- Webb E. Engaging students with engaging tools. Edu cause Quarte rly,
2009. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1–7.
- Wenger E., White N., Smith J. Digital Habitats: stewarding technology for
communities Portland, OR: CPsquare, 2009. 512 p.
- Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning , Meaning, and Identity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 312 p.
- Wodzicki K., Schwämmlein E., Moskaliuk J. «Actually, I Wanted to Lea
rn»: Study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. Internet
and Higher Education, 2012. Vol. 15, pp. 9–14.
- Yunus M., Salehi H., Chenzi C. Integrating Social Networking Tools into
ESL Writing Classroom: Strengths and Weaknesses . Canadian Center of Science
and Education, 2012. Vol. 5, no. 8. 63 p.