Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 4)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Effectiveness of Prompts in Developing the Skill of Answering Questions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder 1458
PhD in Psychology, head of the Chair of Personality Psychology, dean of the Faculty of Psychology, Director, center for applied analysis behaviors, Russia
senior lecturer of the faculty of natural Sciences, employee, Interdisciplinary Center for applied behavior analysis, Novosibirsk, Russia
Assistant of the Department of psychology of personality, faculty of psychology, employee, Interdisciplinary Center for applied behavior analysis, Novosibirsk, Russia
psychologist, Department of personality psychology, faculty of psychology, employee, Interdisciplinary Center for applied behavior analysis, Russia
Intraverbal operant (i.e. intraverbal behavior) in B.F. Skinner’s concept is a class of verbal reactions that includes understanding what is read, holding conversations and answering questions, and also thoughts and memories. Intraverbals are the foundation for learning simple communications, developing academic skills and acquiring professional ones. Many persons with autism spectrum disorder experience considerable difficulties with intraverbal behavior, and there still is no technique that could teach them how to use it fully and functionally. This research on the effectiveness of various types of prompts in educational trainings was aimed at optimizing teaching intraverbal behavior to children with ASD. The study analyzed how children develop the skill of answering questions in the context of textual and echoic prompts. The experiment with two subjects, children of different sexes aged 8 and 17 years diagnosed with ASD, revealed that textual prompts were more effective. The difference in the effectiveness between textual and echoic prompts proved to be more significant for questions with several or many correct answers than in the case with simple questions having only one correct answer.
- Finkel A.S., Williams R.L. A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on
the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism.
The Analysis of Verbal Be- havior, 2002, no. 18, pp. 61–70.
- Ingvarsson E.T., Hollobaugh T. A comparison of prompt- ing tactics to
establish intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 2011. Vol. 44(3), pp. 659–664. doi:
- Neef N.A., Walters J., Egel A.L. Establishing generative yes/no responses
in developmentally disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 1984. Vol. 17(4), pp. 453–460. doi:
- Oah S., Dickinson A.M. A review of empirical studies of verbal behavior.
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1989, no. 7, pp. 53–68.
- Retard A.J.M. Response prompting and fading methods: a review. American
journal of mental retardation, 1990. Vol. 94(6), pp. 603–615.
- Skinner B.F. Verbal Behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Pub- lishing Group. 1957.
458 p. doi: 10.1037/ 11256–000
- Valentino A.L., Shillingsburg M.A., Call N.A. Compar- ing the
effects of echoic prompts and echoic prompts plus modeled prompts on
intraverbal behavior. Journal of Ap- plied Behavior Analysis, 2012. Vol.
45(2), pp. 431–435. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012. 45–431
- Vedora J., Meunier L., Mackay H. Teaching intraverbal behavior to children
with autism: a comparison of textual and echoic prompts.
Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2009, no. 25, pp. 79–86.