Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 2)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Risks of Educational Inclusion: The Experience of Regional Studies in Tyumen State University 1561
PhD in History, Director of the Institute of Psychology and Pedagogy, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
e-mail: l.m. firstname.lastname@example.org
PhD in Sociology, Chair of General and Economic Sociology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
PhD in Education, Head of the Chair of Psychology and Pedagogics of Childhood, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
The paper presents the results of sociological research in the universities of the Tyumen Province, Russia (2081 questionnaires from 9 state institutions of higher education, 2016, April). In the paper, we consider only one aspect of inclusion, namely, joint training of healthy students and students with disabilities. The aim of the study is to assess the risks of inclusive education and its risk factors. Inclusive education is interpreted as 1) a social value, 2) an alternative to social exclusion 3) a resource for development, and 4) an educational innovation with risk potential. The authors developed the concept of «risk» and «risk-factor» for inclusive education, offering their classification. The responses is structured and grouped into three risks mega-groups: 1) general social risks, 2) institutional and group risks, and 3) risks for education actors. These include the risks of falling quality of general, tertiary and vocational education, the risks of social dependency, organizational risks, threat of simulation inclusion and the formal inclusion, personal and professional risks of students, teachers, parents and administrators. Insufficient level of inclusive educational environments in institutions of general, vocational and higher education, lack of skills and competences of teachers for inclusive education, the deficit tolerant attitudes towards persons with disabilities in society and school class are all identified as risk factors. The research leads to conclusions about the need for a conscious administrative influence on the factors to overcome their negative consequences for the success of inclusion.
This work was supported by grant 543873-TEMPUS-1-2013-1-DE-TEMPUS-JPCR.
- Abrahamson P. Sotsialnaya eksklyuziya i bednost [Social exclusion and
porvety]. Obschestvennyie nauki i sovremennost [Public science in
modern life], 2001, no. 2, pp. 158–166 (In Russ., abstr. In Engl).
- Alehina S.V. Printsipyi inklyuzii v kontekste izmeneniy obrazovatelnoy
praktiki [Principles of inclusion in context for educational changes in
practice ]. Psihologicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka [Phycological
education and science], 2014, no. 1, pp. 5–16 (In Russ., abstr. In
- Asmolov A.G. Strategiya i metodologiya sotsiokulturnoy modernizatsii
obrazovaniya [Strategy and methodology in socio cultural educational
modernization]. Problemyi sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of
modern education], 2010, no. 4, pp. 4–18 (In Russ., abstr. In Engl).
- But T., Eynskou M. Pokazateli inklyuzii. Prakticheskoe posobie [Data of
inclusion. Practical textbook]. Moscow: ROOI «Perspektiva», 2007. 124 p.
- Volosnikova L. M. Inklyuziya v vuze: opyit regionalnogo issledovaniya
[Inclusion in University]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i pravovyie issledovaniya
[Newsletter of Tyumen University. Social and Law
research], 2016, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 30–43.
- GOST R ISO 31000-2010. Natsionalnyiy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Risk
management. Printsipyi i rukovodstvo [National standards in Russian Federation.
Risk management. Rules and Guide]. Data vvedeniya 2011-09-01.
- Graumann O., Pevzner M.N., Petryakov P.A., Shirin A.G. Pedagog
v mire mnogoobraziya: veduschie idei i ozhidaemyie rezultatyi novogo
mezhdunarodnogo proekta [Teacher in world diversity.
Main idea and expec-ted results in international project]. In
Ivanov E.V. (ed.), Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: problemyi i perspektivyi:
sbornik trudov po materialam konferentsii [Inclusive education: problems
and perspectives: Collection of works for conference]. Veliky Novgorod:
NovGU, 2015, pp. 24–34.
- Madera A.G. Risks and chances. Uncertainty, forecasting and assessment.
URSS, 2014. 448 p.
- Malofeev N.N. Thankful word for inclusion or speech in myself honor.
Scientific research in education, 2011, no. 11. Vyp. 6, pp. 44–54.
- Nazarova N.M. Systematic risks of inclusive
and special education in modern conditions. Special education, 2012, no.
3, pp. 6–12.
- Ogorodnova O.V., Patrusheva I.V. Regional aspects of interdepartmental
interaction in inclusive education. Historical and social, educational
idea, 2016. Vol. 8, no. 5. Part 3, pp. 119–124.
- Friedmann J. Rethinking poverty: Empowerment and Citizen Right.
International Social Science Journal, 1996, no. 148,
- Jónsson O. Democratic and Inclusive Education in Iceland: Transgression and
the Medical Gaze. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2016. Vol. 7.
- García-Fernández J.M., Inglés C. J., Maria Vicent Juan M.V.,
Gonzálvez-Macià C., Mañas-Viejo C. Attitudes towards Disability
in Education through the SSCI (2000-2011): A Topical
and Bibliometric Analysis/Electronic. Journal of Research in Educational
Psychology, 2013.Vol.11(1), no. 29, pp.139–166.
- UNESCO, Inclusive Education: the Way of the Future, International
Conference on Education, 48th session, Geneva, November 2008 [Electronic