|
|
Evaluation in Rehabilitation: Outcomes, Assessments, and Measurement of Change 1287
Bengel J. Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany Kraft M. Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany Mittag O. University Medical Center of Freiburg, Germany
The evaluation of rehabilitation interventions is of essential significance in rehabilitation and rehabilitation research. In this context, the present article deals with the most important aspects concerning the measurement of success and change. Pivotal outcome criteria and indicators as well as the most often applied self report instruments are introduced. The IRES-3 (Indicators of Rehabilitation Status), developed in Germany, is described in more detail. Following questions regarding the measurement of change, alternative assessment methods, namely goal-oriented measure and adaptive testing based on Item-Response-Theory, are discussed.
- Abberger, B., Haschke, S., Krense, C., Wirtz, M., Bengel, J., &
Baumeister, H. (in press). Development and calibration of an item bank for the
assessment of anxiety in cardiovascular patients using Rasch analysis. Journal
of Clinical Epidemiology.
- Bernhard, J., Lowy, A., Mathys, N., Herrmann, R., & Hürny, C. (2004).
Health related quality of life: A changing construct? Quality of Life Research,
13, 1187-1197.
- Biefang, S., Birkner, B., Thien, U., Härtel, U., & Bullinger, M.
(1997). Harmonisierung der Messung von Outcomes, Prädiktoren und Kosten sowie
Prüfung geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschiede in der
rehabilitationswissenschaftlichen Forschung. Rehabilitation, 36, 1-11.
- Beutler, L.E. & Hamblin, D.L. (1986). Individual outcome measures of
internal change: Methodological considerations. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 54, 48-53.
- Bruyere, S., Van Looy, S., & Peterson, D. B. (2005). The
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health:
Contemporary literature overview. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 113–121.
- Bührlen, B., Gerdes, N., & Jäckel, W. H. (2005). Entwicklung und
psychometrische Testung eines Patientenfragebogens für die medizinische
Rehabilitation (IRES-3). Rehabilitation, 44, 63-74.
- Bullinger, M. (2000). Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit
dem SF-36-Health Survey. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung –
Gesundheitsschutz, 43, 190-197.
- Bullinger, M. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2000). Indikatoren des
Rehabilitationsergebnisses. In J. Bengel & U. Koch (Hrsg.), Grundlagen der
Rehabilitationswissenschaften (S. 305-322). Heidelberg: Springer.
- Coster, W.J., Haley, S.M., Andres, P.L., Ludlow, L.H., Bond, T.L.Y., &
Ni, P. (2004).
Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement. Personal
care and instrumental activities domain. Medical Care, 42, 62-72.
- Deck, R., Mittag, O., Hüppe, A., Muche-Borowski, C., & Raspe, H.
(2007). Index zur Messung von Einschränkungen der Teilhabe (IMET) – Erste
Ergebnisse eines ICF-orientierten Assessmentinstruments. Praxis Klinische
Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 76, 113-120.
- DIMDI (2004). ICF Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit,
Behinderung und Gesundheit. Köln: DIMDI.
- Freund, A. M. & Ziegelmann, J. P. (2009). Lebensqualität: Die Bedeutung
der Selektion, Optimierung und Kompensation. In J. Bengel & M. Jerusalem
(Hrsg.), Handbuch der Gesundheitspsychologie und der Medizinischen Psychologie
(S.475-48). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Frey, C., Zwingmann, C., Böcker, M., Forkmann, T., Kröhne, U., Müller, E.,
& Wirtz. M. (2011). Adaptives Testen in der Rehabilitation - ein Weg zur
ökonomischen Erhebung von Patientenmerkmalen. Rehabilitation, 50(3),
195–203.
- Gerdes, N. (1998). Rehabilitationseffekte bei ‚Zielorientierter
Ergebnismessung’. Ergebnisse der IRES-ZOE-Studie 1996/97. Deutsche
Rentenversicherung, 3-4, 217-237.
- Gerdes, N. (2005). Ein ICF-basiertes Theoriemodell der Rehabilitation als
theoretischer Bezugsrahmen für den IRES-Fragebogen In L. Leonhart & N.
Gerdes (Hrsg.), Der Einsatz des IRES-Fragebogens in der Rehabilitation (S.
93-110). Regensburg: Roderer.
- Haley, S.M., Fragala-Pinkham, M.A., Ni, P.S., Skrinar, A.M., & Corzo,
D. (2005). An adaptive testing approach for assessing physical functioning in
children and adolescents. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47,
113-120.
- Hambleton R. (1993). Principles and selected applications of Item Response
Theory. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp. 147-200). Phoenix:
Oryx.
- Haschke, A., Abberger, B., Müller, E., Wirtz, M., Bengel, J., &
Baumeister, H. (in press). Calibration of an item bank for work capacity in
cardiological rehabilitation patients. European Journal of Preventive
Cardiology.
- Heinemann, A.W. (2005). Putting outcome measurement in context: A
Rehabilitation Psychology perspective. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50,
6-14.
- Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E.
(1981). The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical
consultations. Social Science & Medicine, 15A, 221-229.
- Jäckel, W.H., Bengel, J., & Herdt, J. (Eds.) (2006). Research in
rehabilitation. Results of a German Rehabilitation Research Network
(Freiburg/Bad Säckingen). Stuttgart: Thieme.
- Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987).
The Functional Independence Measure: A New Tool for Rehabilitation. In M. G.
Eisenberg, R. C. Grzesiak (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation (pp.
6-18). Springer: New York.
- Kiresuk, T.J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J.E. (1994). Goal attainment
scaling: applications, theory and measurement. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W., & Lowe, B. (2009). An
Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ-4.
Psychosomatics, 50, 613-621.
- McHorney, C. A. (1999). Health status assessment methods for adults: Past
accomplishments and future challenges. Annual Review of Public Health, 20,
309-35.
- Meyer-Moock S., Moock J., Mittag O., & Kohlmann T. (2012). The factor
structure of direct and indirect methods for measuring change in medical
rehabilitation--analyses on item level [in German]. Die Rehabilitation, 51,
118-128.
- Mittag, O., Kohlmann, T., Meyer, T., Meyer-Moock, S., Meffert, C.,
Farin-Glattacker, E., Gerdes, N., Pohontsch, N., Moock, J., Jelitte, M.,
Löschmann, C., Bitzer, E.M., & Raspe, H. (2012). Empirically Derived
Recommendations for Measuring Patient-Reported Change in Rehabilitation Studies
[in German]. Die Rehabilitation (online-first; DOI:
10.1055/s-0032-1314876).
- Peterson, D. B. (2005).
International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health: An introduction for Rehabilitation
Psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 105–112.
- Reed, G.M., Lux, J.B., & Bufka, L.F. (2005). Operationalizing the
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Clinical
Settings. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 122-131.
- Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1990). Therapieziele, Therapieprozess und
Therapieerfolg. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
- Schulz, H. (2002). FIM Manual. Messung der Funktionalen Selbständigkeit
(Functional Independence Measure). Meerbusch: Schmidt.
- Szcabo, S., on behalf of the WHOQOL Group (1996). The World Health
Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Assessment Instrument. In: B. Spilker
(Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 355-362).
2nd ed. New York: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
- Van der Linden, W.J., & Glas, C.A.W. (2000). Computerized adaptive
testing: Theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer.
- Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form
health survey. Medical Care, 34(3), 220-233.
- Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J. & Bjorner, J. B. (2005). Item
response theory and computerized adaptive testing: Implications for outcomes
measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 71-78.
- Ware, J. E. & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form
Health Survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care,
30(6), 473-483.
- Wirtz, M., Farin, E., Bengel, J., Jäckel, W.H., Hämmerer, D., & Gerdes,
N. (2005). IRES-24 Patientenfragebogen – Entwicklung der Kurzform eines
Assessmentinstrumentes in der Rehabilitation mittels des Mixed-Rasch-Modells.
Diagnostica, 51, 75-87.
-
Zwingmann, C. (2002). Der IRES-Patientenfragebogen.
Psychometrische Reanalysen an einem rehabilitationsspezifischen
Assessmentinstrument. Regensburg: Roderer.
- Zwingmann, C. & Wirtz, M. (2005). Regression zur Mitte. Rehabilitation,
44.
|
|