On the Issue of Assessing the Inclusive Process in an Educational Organization: a Pilot Study 499
PhD in Psychology, Vice-Rector on Inclusive Education, Chief, Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Education, Senior Researcher of Scientific and Methodological Center of the Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
PhD in Psychology, Head of the Research and Methodological Centre of the Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Special Psychology and Rehabilitation of the Faculty of Clinical and Special Psychology, Leading Researcher of the Scientific and Methodological Center of the Institute for Problems of Inclusive Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
The orientation adopted by the world community towards the development of inclusive education requires the development of effective approaches to the assessment and development of inclusion that focus on national and regional specifics. The article presents the results of a pilot study of indicators of the state of the inclusive process by interviewing experts with subsequent content analysis. The possibility of applying an activity-based approach to creating an educational environment (V.V. Rubtsov, I.M. Ulanovskaya and others) as the basis for the implementation of inclusion in an educational organization is being investigated; indicators are proposed for assessing its inclusiveness on the basis of the activity approach with the addition of their value-based approach to assessing the educational environment (S.L. Bratchenko). The answers of the experts correspond to the prevailing understanding of inclusion in Russia (inclusion of persons with disabilities), and experts give priority to indicators of adaptation of individuals, rather than to the results of their mastering the program. The conclusion is drawn about the productivity of the activity approach to the development of inclusion in the educational organization and the compliance of the criteria developed for the inclusion of the educational environment based on the activity approach with the main domestic and foreign scientific developments on this issue.
Keywords: inclusive education, educational organization, inclusive process, indicators of the state of the inclusive process, activity approach, humanitarian expertise
Column: Educational Psychology
Funding. This work was supported by Moscow State University of Psychology and Education.
Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful for assistance in data collection Alexeyeva M.N.
Alekhina S.V. Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: ot politiki k
praktike [Inclusive Education: from Policy to Practice]. Psikhologicheskaya
nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2016. Vol. 21, no.
1, pp. 136–145. doi:10.17759/pse.2016210112. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
Anketnyi opros ekspertov. Gugl-forma [Form of Survey for
the Experts]. Available at: https://forms.gle/CjTPcx6zA9rfJbm58 (Accessed:
Bratchenko S.L. Vvedenie v gumanitarnuyu ekspertizu
obrazovaniya: Metod. Posobie [Introduction into Humanitarian Expertise of
Education]. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Pedagogical
Excellence, 2003. 55 p.
Booth T., Ainscow M. Pokazateli inklyuzii. Prakticheskoe
posobie [Index for Inclusion]. Vogan M. (eds.). Moscow: ROOI “Perspektiva”,
2007. 124 p.
Inchkhonskaya deklaratsiya i TsUR 4 – Obrazovanie 2030:
Ramochnaya programma deistvii po osushchestvleniyu tseli 4 v oblasti
ustoichivogo razvitiya [Electronnyi resurs] [Incheon Declaration and Goal 4:
Education 2030: Sustainable Development Goal 4 framework]. Available at:
(Accessed: 20.10.2019). (In Russ.)
Konventsiya o pravakh invalidov (prinyata rezolyutsiei
61/106 General'noi Assamblei OON ot 13 dekabrya 2006 goda) [Electronnyi resurs]
[Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, United Nations. 2006].
(Accessed: 05.05.2019). (In Russ.)
Nesterova A.A. Kriterii otsenki kachestva inklyuzivnogo
obrazovaniya [Criteria for assessing the quality of inclusive education]. In
Alekhina S.V. (ed.), Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: preemstvennost' inklyuzivnoi
kul'tury i praktiki. Sbornik materialov Chetvertoi Mezhdunarodnoi
nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Inclusive education: the continuity of
inclusive culture and practice. Proceedings of the Forth International
scientific-practical conference]. Moscow: MSUPE, 2017, pp. 38–41.
Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon
Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29 dek. 2012 g. № 273-FZ [Electronnyi resurs] [On
Education in Russian Federation. Federal Act, December 29, 2012, No. 273-FZ].
Rossiiskaya gazeta [The Russian Newspaper]. Available at:
http://www.rg.ru/2012/12/30/obrazovanie-dok.html (Accessed: 28.10.2019).
Rubtsov V.V., Alekhina S.V., Haustov A.V. Continuity of
Inclusive Education and Psychological and Pedagogical Support for Persons with
Special Educational Needs [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie
issledovaniya [Psychological-Educational Studies], 2019. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp.
1–14. doi: 10.17759/ psyedu.2019110301. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
Tekhnologiya otsenki obrazovatel'noi sredy shkoly:
Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya shkol'nykh psikhologov [Technology for
assessing the educational environment of the school: a teaching aid for school
psychologists]. Rubtsov V.V. (eds.). Moscow; Obninsk: IG–SOTsIN, 2010. 256
Alekhina S.V., Samsonova E.V., Yudina T.A. The foundation
of an inclusive paradigm for contemporary education. Special Education, 2018.
Vol. 1, no. 38, pp. 47–60. doi: 10.21277/se.v1i38.366
Indicators of Inclusive Schools: Continuing the
Conversation [Electronnyi resurs]. Represented by the Minister of Education.
Alberta, Canada: Minister of Education, 2013. 33 р. URL:
Jorgensen С.M. Quality Indicators of Inclusive Education.
Jorgensen C.M. (eds.). New Hampshire, NE: National Center on Inclusive
Education, Institute on Disability/UCEDD, University of New Hampshire, 2012. 24
Kyriazopoulou M., Weber H. Development of a set of
indicators – for inclusive education in Europe [Electronnyi resurs]. Odense,
Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education, 2009. 46
p. URL: https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/Indicators-EN.pdf
Peterson M.J., Hittle M.M. Inclusive teaching: creating
effective schools for learners. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2003. 533 p.
Sprunta B. Entering the SDG era: What do Fijians
prioritise as indicators of disability-inclusive education? [Electronnyi
resurs]. In Sprunta B. (eds.). Disability and the Global South, 2017. Vol. 4,
no. 1, pp. 1065–1087. URL:
Van Mieghem A., Verschueren K., Petry K. and Struyf E. An
analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta
review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, June 2018. doi: