Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 11, no. 3)

Included in Scopus

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


G. Mead's Theory of “Self” and Psychological Anthropology 2934


Belik A.A.
Doctor of History, leading researcher of the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia

The article provides reconstruction of G.H. Mead's theory of “Self” and analyses influence of this concept on psychological anthropology. It is focused on active character of interactions of “Self” with the other people that is the drive (moving force) of an individual's ontogenetic development. Particular emphasis of the research is made on the process of emerging of thinking as internal dialog and the role of active “Self” in the process of creating novelty in society. The article argues that G. H. Mead's ideas are topical for the state-of-art ethnopsychological research; shows types of influence of the concept of “Self” on studies in ethnic (cultural) identity. The author states that the most interesting use of G. H. Mead's ideas is the comparative analysis of psychological peculiarities of “Self” in eastern and western cultures.

Keywords: ethnic identity, generalized other, significant others, thinking as dialog, ontogenetic development, action, historical process, psychosocial homeostasis, need for emotional closeness, human.

Column: Theoretical Research

For Reference

  1. Amerikanskaya sociologicheskaya mysl'. R. Merton. Dzh. Mid. T. Parsons. A. Shyuc. Teksty / Pod red. V. I. Dobren'kova. M., 1996.
  2. Belik A. A. Istoriko-teoreticheskie problemy psihologicheskoi antropologii. M., 2005.
  3. Belik A. A. Kul'turnaya (social'naya) antropologiya. M., 2009.
  4. Mel'vil' Yu. K. Bihevioristskii pragmatizm Dzh. G. Mida // Sovremennaya burzhuaz­naya filosofiya / Pod red. A. S. Bogomolova, Yu. K. Mel'vilya, I. S. Narskogo. M., 1978.
  5. Myurrei D. Chto takoe zapadnaya koncepciya «Self»? // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Etnos. M., 2001.
  6. Rozenberger N. Dialekticheskoe ravnovesie v polyarnoi modeli «Self»: primer Yaponii // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Etnos. Sovremennaya psihologicheskaya antropologiya / Pod red. A. A. Belika. M., 2001.
  7. Cepir E. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kul'turologii. M., 1993.
  8. Altman I. Privacy as an interpersonal boundary process // Human ethology /Ed by V. von Cranach, K. Foppa et al. Cambridge, 1979.
  9. Bock Rh. K. Rethinking Psychological Anthropology (Ch. 12. Emotion and Selfhood). N. Y., 1988.
  10. Brison K. J. Crafting Sociocentric Selves in Religions. Discourse in Rural in Figi // Ethos. 2001. № 4.
  11. Cognition and social selves. Ch. II // New Direction in Psychological Anthropology / Ed. by Th. Schwartz, G. M. White and C. A. Lutz. Cambridge, 1999.
  12. Edwards A. An Interesting Resemblance: Vygotsky, Mead and American Pragmatism // The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky / Ed. By H. Daniels, M. Cole, J. V. Wеrtch. Cambridge, 2007.
  13. Hollos M., Leis Ph. M. Remodeling Concepts of the Self: An Ijo Example // Ethos. 2001. № 3.
  14. Holland D., Lachicotte W. J. R. Vygotsky, Mead and the New Sociocultural Studies of Identity // The Cambridge companion of Vygotsky. Cambridge, 2007.
  15. Hsu F. L. K. The Self in Cross-Cultural Perspective // Culture and Self / Ed. by G. Marsella, De Vos G., Hsu F. L. K. N. Y., 1985.
  16. Kray C. A. The Pentecostal Re-Formation of Self: Opting for Orthodoxy in Yucatan // Ethos. 2001. № 4.
  17. Mead G. H. The Social Self // Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method. 1913. V. 10.
  18. Mead G. H. Genesis of Self and Social Control // International Jornal of Ethics. 1925. V. 35.
  19. Меаd G. H. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago,1963.
  20. Mead G. H. Selected Writings / Ed. by Reck A. J. Indianapolis, 1964.
  21. Narrative Analysis Cross Culturally: The Self as Revealed in The TAT // Ed. by G. De Vos. Berkeley, 2003.
  22. Schrauwers A. Sitting in Silence: Self, Emotion and Tradition in the Genesis of Charismatic Ministry // Ethos. 2001. № 4.
  23. Vos de G. Ethnic Pluralism: Conflict and Accommodation // Ethnic Identity. Chicago; L., 1982.
  24. Vos de G. Introduction 1982 // Ethnic Identity. Chicago; L., 1982.
  25. Taylor R. B. Human territorial functioning. Cаmbridge, 1988.

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????