Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2019. Vol. 10, no. 3)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Dominant values of family purposefulness depending on some socio-demographic factors 921

Nozikova N.V., PhD in Psychology, associate professor, Far Eastern State University of Humanities, Khabarovsk, Russia, nv_nozikova@bk.ru
Abstract
The article presents the data of the empirical study of the dominant values of family purposefulness, depending on several socio-demographic factors (sex, and the presence / absence of his family according to the age). 50 girls and 50 boys of 15—18 age participated in the research; 50 women of 21—44 age and 45 men of 20—42 age, who are married and have children. Computer program Osgood of semantic differential technique modified by I.L. Solomina was applied. According to the purpose of the study there are chosen: 1) category of concepts related to the family life (people and groups, events, activities and ideal representation); 2) the concept of markers defining the basic values, stages of life, people, groups of people and attitude to them, gender concepts, activities, emotional feelings and events. It is brought out the dependence of the dominant values from sex factor. So, the girls have the dominance of the value concept “my future family”, the young men — “my future wife”. “The birth of a child” is the general dominant value for male and female, who are married and have children.

Keywords: family, purposefulness, family purposefulness, values, gender, age, psychosemantics

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2016070404

For Reference

References
  1. Avdulova T.P. Sotsializatsiya rebenka v prostranstve sem’i [The socialization of the child in the family space]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research (Rus- sia)], 2013, Vol. 6, no. 31. pp. 9. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Acctssed 09.01.2015). (In Russia).
  2. Antonov A.I. Mikrosotsiologiya sem’I [Family microsociology]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 2009. 368 p. (In Russia).
  3. Blauberg I.V., Yudin E.G., Sadovskii V.N. Sistemnyi podkhod [Systems approach]. In I.T. Kasavin (ed.). Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemol- ogy and philosophy of science]. Moscow: “Kanon+” pri ROOI Reabilitatsiya Publ., 2009, pp. 869–870. (In Russia).
  4. Borzenkov V.G. Funktsiya. Tsel’. Tselenapravlennost’ [Function. Goal. Purposeful- ness]. In I.T. Kasavin (ed.). Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow: “Kanon+” ROOI Reabilitatsiya Publ., 2009, pp. 1106—1113. (In Russia).
  5. Borzova T.V. Narrativnoe ponimanie sub”ektom sebya i okruzhayushchei deistvitel’nosti v protsesse obucheniya [Narrative understanding of the subject itself and the surrounding reality in the learning process]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Acad- emy of Sciences (Russia)], 2015, Vol. 17, no. 1—1, pp. 72—78. (In Russia).
  6. Vasil’ev I.A. Tseleobrazovanie [Goal formation]. In I.T. Kasavin (ed.). Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow: “Kanon+” pri ROOI Reabilitatsiya Publ., 2009, pp. 1113–1114. (In Russia).
  7. Vyaznikova L.F. Ulitenko T.V. Sootnoshenie znachimosti i dostupnosti tsennostnykh orientatsii u studentov gumanitarnykh vuzov [The ratio of the value and availability of valuable orientations at students of liberal arts colleges]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka [Teacher education and science (Russia)], 2011, no. 5, pp. 60—64. (In Russia).
  8. Dolgikh N.P. Refleksivnaya kul’tura kak osnova bezopasnosti professional’noi deyatel’nosti [Reflective culture as a basis of professional work safety]. Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya [Higher Education Challenges (Russia)], 2012, no. 1, pp. 80—82. (In Rus- sian).
  9. Dubov I.G., Tolstykh N.N. Svyaz’ zhiznennykh tselei lyudei i ikh aktivnosti [Contact life goals of people and their activities]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psy- chology and Society (Russia)], 2011, no. 2, pp. 37—51. (In Russian; abstract in English).
  10. Elizarov S.G. Motivatsionno-tsennostnaya vklyuchennost’ maloi gruppy v sotsial’nuyu sistemu (sistemu grupp) razlichnykh tipov (na primere issledovaniya molo- dezhnykh uchebnykh grupp): avtoref. …doktora psikhol. nauk [Motivatsionno-tsennost- naya vklyuchennost ‘maloi gruppy v sotsial’nuyu sistemu (sistemu grupp) razlichnykh tipov (na primere issledovaniya molodezhnykh uchebnykh grupp). Dr. Sci. (Psychology) thesis]. Kursk, 2010. 51 p. (In Russian).
  11. Zhuravlev A.L., Drobysheva T.V. Vliyanie rannego ekonomicheskogo obrazovaniya na tsennostnye orientatsii mladshikh shkol’nikov [Effect of early economic education on the value orientation of younger schoolboys]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. (Russia)], 2012, no. 1, pp. 181—190. (In Russian).
  12. Zhuravleva N.A. Tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti s raznym semeinym statusom [Valuable orientations of the person with a different marital status]. Psikhologiya sovmest- noi zhiznedeyatel’nosti malykh grupp i organizatsii [Psychology of life together small groups and organizations (Russia)]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2001. pp. 60—76. (In Russian).
  13. Karpov A.V. Psikhologiya soznaniya: metasistemnyi podkhod [Psychology of Con- sciousness: The metasystem approach]. Moscow: RAO Publ., 2011. 1088 p. (In Russian).
  14. Klyueva N.V., Runovskaya E.G. Osobennosti tsennostno-smyslovoi sfery zhensh- chin fertil’nogo vozrasta s razlichnym tipom otnosheniya k abortu [Features of the val- ue-semantic sphere of women of childbearing age with a different type of relationship to abortion]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University. PG Demidov. Series Hu- manities (Russia)], 2013, no. 3, pp. 86—90. (In Russian).
  15. Leont’ev A.N. Ocherk razvitiya psikhiki [Mental development Essay]. Izbrannye psik- hologicheskie proizvedeniya: V 2-kh t. T. I [Selected psychological works:. In 2 vols. Vol. I.]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1983. 392 p. (In Russian).
  16. Nozikova N.V. Materinskaja i semejno-orientirovannaja napravlennost’ devushek 15—22 let: Аvtoref. diss. kand. psihol. nauk [Parent and family-focused orientation of girls 15—22 years. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Jaroslavl’, 2005. 24 p. (In Russian).
  17. Nozikova N.V. Stanovlenie semejno-orientirovannoj i materinskoj napravlennosti de- vushek-studentok [Becoming a family-oriented and parent orientation female students]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education (Russia)], 2009, no. 1, рр. 90—97. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.)
  18. Nozikova N.V. Psikhosemanticheskii podkhod v issledovaniyakh semeinoi i mater- inskoi napravlennosti devushek 15—17 let [Psychosemantic approach in studies of fam- ily and parent orientation of girls 15—17 years old]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology (Russia)], 2014, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 69—77. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.)
  19. Nozikova N.V. Dominiruyushchie tsennosti semeinoi tselenapravlennosti [Dominant values family focus]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Russian psychological journal (Russia)], 2015, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 89—104. (In Russian).
  20. Nozikova N.V. Strukturnyi analiz psikhosemanticheskoi sistemy semeinoi sotsial’no- psikhologicheskoi tselenapravlennosti [Structural analysis psycho-semantic system of family socio-psychological focus]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Histori- cal Psychology (Russia)], 2015, Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 44—54. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.)
  21. Nozikova N.V. Analiz psikhosemanticheskoi sistemy semeinoi tselenapravlennosti u muzhchin [Analysis psychosemantic systems family focus in men]. Kul’turno-istoricheska- ya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology (Russia)], 2016, Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 69—79. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.)
  22. Petrenko V.F. Mnogomernoe soznanie: psihosemanticheskaja paradigm [Multidimen- sional consciousness: psychosemantic paradigm]. Moscow: Novyj hronograf Publ., 2010. 440 p. (In Russian).
  23. Solomin I.L. Metodika psihosemanticheskoj diagnostiki motivacii (PDM) [Methods psychosemantic diagnostic motivation (VSD)]. Sankt-Peterburg: Rech’ Publ., 2011. 10 p. (In Russian).
  24. Filippova G.G. Psikhologiya materinstva [Psychology of motherhood]. Moscow: In- stitut Psikhoterapii Publ., 2002. 240 p. (In Russian).
  25. Osgood Ch.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana etc.: Univ. of Illinois press, 1967. 346 p.
comments powered by Disqus
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????