Previous issue (2020. Vol. 11, no. 3)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
The development of trial questionnaire on social exclusion 1169
Suvorova I.Yu.
PhD student in the department of Social and Differential psychology, People’s Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: i.suvorova89@gmail.com
The article describes the evolution of the phenomenon of social exclusion and methods of its investigation in laboratory conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the diagnostic of social exclusion has been primarily based on external factors till now. This article is devoted to the creation of questionnaire aimed to reveal the psychological experience of social exclusion in natural conditions. Such tool is necessary because it is insufficient to refer only to external conditions of personal exposure to the periphery of social system in order to estimate psychological exclusion, as physical and psychological exclusion do not always coincide. The reliability of our questionnaire is α = 0,952. The validity of the tool was checked through the correlation with Leontiev’s Test of Sense of Life Orientations. As a result, strong links were found between scales of both tests (0,462< r < 0,725; 0,01< p< 0,05).
- Bazarov T.Ju., Sycheva M.P. Sozdanie i aprobacija oprosnika “Stili
reagirovanija na izmenenija” [Creation and approbation of the questioner “The
styles of reaction to changes”]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija
[Psychological investigations], 2012. Vol. 5, no. 25, pp. 12. URL:
http://psystudy.ru (Accessed
30.05.2015).
- Berger P., Luckmann T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po
sociologii znanija [Social construction of reality]. Moscow: “Medium”, 1995.
323 p.
- Karandashev V.N. Metodika Shvarca dlja izuchenija cennostej lichnosti:
koncepcija i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Schwarz ‘s questioner for study of
personal values: the con- cept and methodological guidance]. Saint-Petersburg:
Rech’, 2004. 70s.
- Leont’ev D.A. Test smyslozhiznennyh orientacii (SZhO) [Test of personal
lifestyle]. 2-e izd. Moscow: Smysl, 2000. 18 p.
- Stepanova E., Eflova M. Social’naja jekskljuzija zakljuchennyh i
jeks-zakljuchennyh v Rossii [The social exclusion of prisoners and
ex-prisoners]. Vlast’ [Power], 2012, no. 1, pp. 85—89.
- Studenna M. Problema social’noj jekskljuzii v postindustrial’nom obshhestve
na pri- mere pol’skih i ukrainskih centrov ugol’noj promyshlennosti [Polish and
Ukrainian coal industry as an example of the problem of social exclusion at
postindustrial society]. Istorija i sovremennost’[History and Present],
2010, no. 1, pp. 190—201.
- Suvorova I.Ju. Primenenie teorii dinamiki identichnosti dlja opisanija
vzaimosvjazi cheloveka i social’noj real’nosti [The application of Identity
Process theory for descrip- tion of personal-social relationship].
Penzenskij psihologicheskij vestnik [Penza psychologi- cal newsletter].
Penza, 2016, no. 1 (6), pp. 40—62. doi:10.17689/psy-2016.1.3.
- Shamshikova O.E., Volohova V.I. Adaptacija oprosnika “Granicy v psihike”
Jernesta Hartmana [The adaptation of Ernst Hartmann’s questioner ‘Boundaries of
the mind’]. Materialy II vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii
“Razvitie cheloveka v sovre- mennom mire” [Proceedings of II All-Russian
scientific-practical conference “Human de- velopment in the modern
world”]. Novosibirsk. 2011, pp. 277—287.
- Abrams D., Grant P.R. Testing the Social Identity Relative Deprivation
(SIRD) model of Social Change: The Political Rise of Scottish Nationalism.
British Journal of So- cial Psychology, 2011. Vol. 51, pp. 674—689. doi:
10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x.
- Abrams D., Hewstone M. ESRC Seminar Series on Social Inclusion and
Exclusion: Informing Policy through Social Psychology: Conclusion Report.
University of Kent: Kent Publication. 2004. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL:
https://kar.kent.ac.uk/41650/ (Ac- cessed: 14.08.2014).
- Crumbaugh J.C., Maholick L.T. An experimental study in existentialism: The
psycho- metric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 1964. Vol. 20, pp. 589—596. doi: 10.1.1.505.6866.
- Eisenberger N.I. Social Pain and the Brain: Controversies, Questions, and
Where to Go from Here. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015. Vol. 66, pp.
601—629. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-psych-010213-115146.
- Hitti A., Mulvey K.L., Rutland A., Abrams D., Killen M. When Is It Okay to
Exclude a Member of the Ingroup? Children’s and Adolescents’ Social
Reasoning. Social Develop- ment, 2014. Vol. 23. Is. 3, pp. 451—469. doi:
10.1111/sode.12047.
- Macdonald G., Leary M.R. Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship
be- tween social and physical pain. Psychol Bull, 2005. Vol. 131. Is. 2,
pp. 202—223. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202.
- Pierce J.J., Siddiki S., Jones M.D., Schumacher K., Pattison A., Peterson
H. Social Construction and Policy Design: A Review of Past Applications. The
Policy Studies Jour- nal, 2014. Vol. 42. Is. 1. doi:
10.1111/psj.12040.
- Power A., Wilson W.J. Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities. Centre for
Analysis of Social Exclusion. London: London School of Economics. 2000.
- Schneider A., Ingram H. Social Construction of Target Populations:
Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review,
1993. Vol. 87. Is. 2, pp. 334—347. doi: 10.2307/2939044.
- Schwartz S.H., Verkasalo M., Antonovsky A., Sagiv L. Value priorities and
social de- sirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social
Psychology, 1997. Vol. 36, pp. 3—18.
- Sen A. Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny. Manila: Asian
Develop- ment Bank, Office of Environment and Social development. 2000. 54
p.
|
|
