Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2020. Vol. 11, no. 1)

Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)

Included in Scopus

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

40 years of Bio-Psycho-Social model: what’s new? 3638

Kholmogorova A.B.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-0199
e-mail: kholmogorova@yandex.ru

Rychkova O.V.
Doctor of Psychology, leading researcher at the Laboratory of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, State Research Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry named after V.P. Serbsky, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: rychkovao@bk.ru

Abstract
Bio-Psycho-Social Model, proposed by George Engel in 1977, was recognized as a turning point in the praxis of medical diagnosis and treatments. Bio-Psycho-Social Model should be seen in a historical context as bucking against the trend of biological reductionism. Social Neuroscience has been formed ten years. Social neuroscience aims to investigate the biological systems that underlie people’s thoughts, feelings and actions in light of the social context in which they operate. Social neuroscience has captured the interest of anthropologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and experts in other disciplines, as well as the general public who more and more draw upon the insights and methods of social neuroscience to explain, predict and change social behavior. An analysis of the current situation in neurosciences shows that new methods of instrumental brain research do not exclude biological reductionism. The authors qualify the situation in modern studies of social neuroscience as a methodological crisis associated with the prevalence of reductionist approaches that ignore the uniqueness of the human psyche. He substantiates the heuristic provisions of the cultural and historical development of Vygotsky’s psyche theory to overcome any contradictions

Keywords: Social Neuroscience, social brain, biopsychosocial model of mental disorders, Vygotskian Cultural-Historical Theory of Development

Column: Theoretical Research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080402

For Reference

References
  1. Amen D. Mozg i dusha: novye otkrytija o vlijanii mozga na harakter, chuvstva, jemocii. [Brain and soul: new discoveries about the influence of the brain on the character, feelings, emotions]. Moskow: Jeksmo, 2012. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Arden Dzh. Ukroshhenie amigdaly i drugie instrumenty trenirovki mozga. [The Taming of the amygdala and other brain training tools]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2016. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Baars B., Gejdzh N. Mozg, poznanie, razum. Vvedenie v kognitivnye nejronauki: v 2-h t. [Brain, knowledge, reason. Introduction to Cognitive Neuroscience: in 2 vol.]. Moscow: Binom. Laboratorija znanij, 2016. 1008 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Behtereva N.P. Magija mozga i labirinty zhizni. [The magic of the brain and the labyrinth of life]. Moscow: AST, 2015. 384 p.
  5. Vygotskij L.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 6 t. T. 2. Myshlenie i rech’ [Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol. 2. Thinking and speaking]. Moskow: Pedagogika, 1982. 301 p.
  6. Vygotskij L.S. Problema vysshih intellektual’nyh funkcij v sisteme psihotehnicheskogo issledovanija. [The problem of higher intellectual functions in the system of psychotechnical research]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija [Cultural-historical psychology], 2007, no. 3, pp. 105—111.
  7. Rychkova O.V., Holmogorova A.B. Koncepcija «social’nogo mozga» kak osnovy social’nogo poznanija i ego narushenij pri psihicheskoj patologii: chast’ I: koncepcija «social’nyj mozg» — produkt sovremennoj nejronauki [Social Brain Concept as a Basis for Social Cognition and Its Deficits in Mental Disorders. Part I. ‘Social Brain’: Product of Modern Neuroscience]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija [Cultural-historical psychology], 2012, no. 3, pp. 86—94.
  8. Rychkova O.V., Holmogorova A.B. Koncepcija «social’nogo mozga» kak osnovy social’nogo poznanija i ego narushenij pri psihicheskoj patologii: chast’ II: koncepcija «social’nyj mozg» — strukturnye komponenty i svjaz’ s psihopatologiej [Social Brain Concept as a Basis for Social Cognition and Its Deficits in Mental Disorders. Part II. ‘Social Brain’: Structural Components and Connections with Psychopathology]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija [Cultural-historical psychology], 2012, no. 4, pp. 86— 95.
  9. Turkington D., Taj S., Braun S., Holmogorova A. Kognitivno-bihevioral’naja psihoterapija: dokazatel’stvo jeffektivnosti i osnovnye tehniki raboty s galljucinacijami i bredom [Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy: evidence of effectiveness and basic techniques of working with hallucinations and delirium]. Sovremennaja terapija psihicheskih rasstrojstv [Modern therapy of mental disorders], 2011, no. 1, pp. 25—32.
  10. Falikman M.V. Kognitivnaya paradigma: est’ li v nei mesto psihologii? [Elektronnyi resurs] [The cognitive paradigm: is there room for psychology within it?]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 2015. Vol. 8, no. 42, pp. 3. URL: http://psystudy.ru/ index.php/num/2015v8n42/1166-falikman42.html (Accessed 12.11.2017). (in Russian, abstr. in English).
  11. Frit K. Mozg i dusha. Kak nervnaja dejatel’nost’ formiruet nash vnutrennij mir [Brain and soul. How nervous activity shapes our inner world]. Moscow: Corpus; Astrel’. 2010. 335 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Hanson R., Mendius R. Mozg i schast’e: zagadki sovremennoj nejropsihologii [Brain and happiness: the riddles of modern neuropsychology]. Moskow: Jeksmo, 2011. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Holmogorova A.B. Obostrenie bor’by paradigm v naukah o psihicheskom zdorov’e: v poiskah vyhoda [The aggravation of the struggle of paradigms in the sciences of mental health: in search of an exit]. Social’naja i klinicheskaja psihiatrija [Social and Clinical Psychiatry], 2014, no. 4. pp. 53—61.
  14. Holmogorova A.B., Rychkova O.V. Narushenija social’nogo poznanija — novaja paradigma v issledovanijah central’nogo psihologicheskogo deficita pri shizofrenii. [Violations of social cognition: a new paradigm in the study of the central psychological deficits in schizophrenia]. Moskow: FORUM. 2016. 288 p.
  15. Holmogorova A.B., Rychkova O.V. Osnovnye teoreticheskie podhody k issledovaniju narushenij social’nogo poznanija pri shizofrenii: sovremennyj status i perspektivy razvitija [Basic theoretical approaches to the study of violations of social cognition in schizophrenia: current status and development prospects]. Konsul’tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. [Consultative psychology and psychotherapy], 2014, no. 4 (83), pp. 30—43.
  16. Holmogorova A.B., Rychkova O.V., Pugovkina O.D., Moskacheva M.A. Misheni i metody psihologicheskoj pomoshhi pacientam s rasstrojstvami shizofrenicheskogo i affektivnogo spektra. [Targets and methods of psychological care for patients with schizophrenic and affective disorder]. Moskow: Neolit, 2016. 96 p.
  17. Blakemore S.J, Bristow D., Bird G., Frith C., Ward J. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain, 2005. Vol. 128, pp. 1571—1583.
  18. Brothers L. The social brain: a project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts Neurosci, 1990. Vol. 1, pp. 27—51.
  19. Brüne M., Ebert A. From Social Neurons to Social Cognition: Implications for Schizophrenia Research. Düşünen Adam Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 2011. Vol. 24, pp. 58—68.
  20. Burns J.K. An evolutionary theory of schizophrenia: Cortical connectivity, metarepresentation, and the social brain. Behav. Brain Sciences, 2004. Vol. 27, pp. 831—855.
  21. Burns J.K. The social brain hypothesis of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry, 2006. Vol. 5, pp. 77—81.
  22. Cacioppo J.T., Berntson G.G. Social neuroscience. In J.T. Cacioppo et al. (Eds.). Foundations in social neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. pp. 1—9.
  23. Cacioppo J., Cacioppo S., Dulawa S., Palmer A. Social neuroscience and its potential contribution to psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 131—139. (In Russ.).
  24. Ciompi L. Auf dem Weg zu einem kohärenten multidemensionalen Krankheits- und Therapieverständnis der Schizophrenie: Konvergierende neue Konzepte. Н. Brenner, W. Böker (Hrsg.). Bewältigung der Schizophrenie. Bern, 1986, pp. 51—52.
  25. Ciompi L. The dynamics of complex biologicalpsychosocial systems. Four fundamental psychobiological mediators in the long-term evolution of schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychi, 1989. Vol. 155, pp. 15—21; p. 27.
  26. Cook R., Bird G., Catmur C., Press C., Heyes C. Mirror neurons: from origin to function. Behav Brain Sci, 2014 Apr. Vol. 37(2), pp. 177—92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13000903
  27. Cuthbert B.N. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13, pp. 28—35.
  28. Decety J. Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy. Emot Rev, 2011. Vol. 3, pp. 92—108.
  29. Decety J., Norman G.J., Berntson G.G. et al. A neurobehavioral evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms underlying empathy. Prog Neurobiol, 2012. Vol. 98, pp. 38—48.
  30. Decety J., Smith K.E., Norman G.J., Yalpern J. A social neuroscience perspective on clinical empathy. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13, pp. 233—237.
  31. Dunbar R. The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 2009. Vol. 36(5), pp. 562—572.
  32. Engel G. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. The American Journal of Psychiatry, May 1980. Vol. 137, pp. 535—544.
  33. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 1977, no. 196, pp. 129—136.
  34. Fava J. The biopsychosocial model thirty years later. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2008. Vol. 77, pp. 1—2.
  35. Ferrari P., Rozzi S., Fogassi L. Mirror neuron responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2005. Vol. 17, pp. 212—226.
  36. Frances A. RDoC is necessary, but very oversold. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13, pp. 48—49.
  37. Gotliba I., Siversa H., Gabrielia J., Whit¢eld-Gabrielia S., Goldina P., Minora K., Canlib T. Subgenual anterior cingulate activation to valenced emotional stimuli in major depression. Neuroreport, 2005. Vol 16 (16), pp. 1731—1734.
  38. Gur R., Gur R. Social Cognition as an RDoC Domain. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 2016. Vol. 171B, pp. 132—141.
  39. Guse S. Biological psychiatry: is there any other kind? Psychological Medicine, 1989. Vol. 19, pp. 315—323.
  40. Heyes C. Where do mirror neurons come from? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010. Vol. 34, pp. 575—583.
  41. Howes O., McCutcheon R., Owen M., Murray R. The Role of Genes, Stress, and Dopamine in the Development of Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry, 2017. Vol. 81(1), pp. 9—20.
  42. Howes O., Murray R. Schizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model. Lancet, 2014. Vol. 383(9929), pp. 1677—1687.
  43. Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review Psychol, 2009. Vol. 60, pp. 653—670.
  44. Ibanez A., Kuljis R.O., Matallana D., Manes F. Bridging psychiatry and neurology through social neuroscience. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13(2), pp. 148—149. doi: 10.1002/wps.20125
  45. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neurosci, 2000. Vol. 3, pp. 759—763.
  46. Kedia G., Harris L., Lelieveld G.-J., van Dillen L. From the Brain to the Field: The Applications of Social Neuroscience to Economics, Health and Law. Brain Sci., 2017. Vol. 7(8), pp. 94. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5575614/ (Accessed 2.12.2017).
  47. Kilner J.M., Lemon R.N. What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons. Curr Biol., 2013. Vol. 23(23), pp. 1057—1062.
  48. Kosonogov V. Why the Mirror Neurons Cannot Support Action Understanding. Neurophysiology, 2012. Vol. 44(6), pp. 499—502.
  49. Lord C., Cook E., Leventhal B., Amaral D. Autism spectrum disorders. Neuron, 2000. Vol. 28, pp. 355—363.
  50. Maréchal M.A., Cohn A., Ugazio G., Ruff C.C. Increasing honesty in humans with noninvasive brain stimulation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017. Vol. 114(17), pp. 4360—4364.
  51. Morrison I., Lloyd D., di Pellegrino G., Roberts N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci, 2004. Vol. 4, pp. 270—278.
  52. Oberman L., Ramachandran V. The Simulating Social Mind: The Role of the Mirror Neuron System and Simulation in the Social and Communicative Deficits of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 2007. Vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 310 —327.
  53. Perrett D., Hietanen J., Oram M., Benson P. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B, 1992. Vol. 335, pp. 23—30.
  54. Plomin R., Asbury K. Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 2005. Vol. 600, pp. 86—98.
  55. Plomin R., DeFries J.C., Knopik V.S., Neiderhiser J.M. Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2016. Vol. 11(1), pp. 3—23.
  56. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 2004. Vol. 27, pp. 169—192.
  57. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain. Res. Cogn. Brain. Res, 1996. Vol. 3, pp. 131—141.
  58. Rotge J.Y. et al. A meta-analysis of the anterior cingulate contribution to social pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2015. Vol 10, pp. 19—27. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu110 (2015).
  59. Social Neuroscience. Aims and scope. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/jou rnalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=psns20 (Accessed 12.11.2017)
  60. Social neuroscience: integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior. In Eddie Harmon-Jones, Piotr Winkielman (Eds). The Guilford Press. A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc. New York, 2007. 512 р.
  61. Wakefield J.C. Wittgenstein’s nightmare: why the RDoC grid needs a conceptual dimension. World Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 13, pp. 38—39.
  62. Young L., Dungan J. Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere. Social neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 7 (1), pp. 1—10. PMID: 21590587
  63. Zheng Y., Yang Z., Jin C., Qi Y., Liu X. The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence. Front Psychol., 2017. Sep. Vol. 19(8), pp. 1592. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592
  64. Zubin J. Die Anpassung therapeutischer Interventionen an die wissenschaftlichen Modelle der Ätiologie. In W. Böker, H. Brenner (Hrs.). Schizophrenie als systemische Störung. Bern, 1989. 341 p.
 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2020 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????