The relationship between the socio-demographic characteristics of employees and their organizational identification and their perceived attractiveness of corporate culture

Nesmeianova R.K.
Employee of the Department of Social Psychology, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: Roxielight@mail.ru

PDF (RUS)
Quick translation of full-text in Google Translate

The article presents the results of comparing the interrelationships between the individual characteristics of employees (gender, age, education, position and seniority in the organization) with the types of organizational identification that they form, the level of need for it, and the degree of attractiveness of the corporate culture. The study involved 252 respondents (185 women, 67 men), all — representatives of commercial organizations. Data collection was carried out in one stage, a questionnaire was proposed, which included three methods. The resulting material was mathematically processed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Data are received that managers are less likely than performers to experience negative, ambiguous or neutral feelings towards their organization. The older the employees, the higher the level of their identification with it. The most senior employees are identified most with their company, as well as employees who have a long working record. Thus, a correlation was revealed between the socio-demographic characteristics of employees and the organizational variables under study.

Keywords: attractiveness of corporate culture, organizational identification, need for identification, individual characteristics of employees

Column: Empirical study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090105

For Reference

Nesmeianova R.K. The relationship between the socio-demographic characteristics of employees and their organizational identification and their perceived attractiveness of corporate culture. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–77. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090105. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Burmistrova O.N. Svjaz’ vidov organizacionnoj identifikacii s ocenkoj dejatel’nosti rukovoditelja [Communication of kinds of organizational identification with the estimation of efficiency of activity of the head and realization of the basic administrative functions by it]. Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta, ser. 11, Estestv. nauki. [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Natural sciences], 2012. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 78—84.
Lipatov S.A. Oprosnik «Shkaly organizacionnyh paradigm» L.L. Konstantina [Questionnaire of “Scale oforganizational paradigms” of L.L. Konstantin”. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psihologa [Journal of Practical Psychologist], 2005. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 186—198.
Lipatov S.A. Organizacionnaja kul’tura: social’noe poznanie v organizacionnom kontekste [Organizational culture: social cognition in an organizational context]. Mir psihologii [The World of Psychology], 1999, no. 3, pp. 106—112.
Lipatov S.A., Lovakov A.V. Issledovanija organizacionnoj identifikacii v zarubezhnoj psihologii [Recent studies of organizational identification in foreign psychology]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2010, no. 1(3), pp. 70—75.
Lipatov S.A., Zhilkina O.V. Processy social’noj identifikacii v organizacijah [Processes of social identification in organizations]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psihologa [Journal of Practical Psychologist], 2005, no. 2, pp. 25—40.
Ashforth B. Mael F. Teorija social’noj identichnosti v kontekste organizacii [The theory of social identity in the context of organization]. In Djatlova A.A., Lovakov A.V. (ed.). Organizacionnaja psihologija [Organizational Psychology], 2012. Vol. 2, no. 1. pp. 4—27.
Boros S., Curseu P.L., Miclea M. Integrative tests of a multidimensional model of organizational identification. Social Psychology, 2011. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 111—123. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000051
Brewer M.B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991. Vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 475—482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
Dutton J.E., Dukerich J.M., Harquail C.V. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994. Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 239—263. doi:10.2307/2393235
Epitropaki O. A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated-mediated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013. Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65—86. doi:10.1002/job.1793
Glynn M. A. Individuals need for organizational identification (nOID): speculations on individual differences in the propensity to identify. In D.A. Whetten, P.C. Godfrey (Ed.). Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, 1998. pp. 238—244.
Kreiner G.E., Ashforth B.E. Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1—27. doi:10.1002/job.234
Mayhew M.G., Gardner J., Ashkanasy N.M. Measuring individuals’ need for identification: Scale development and validation // Personality and Individual Differences, 2010. Vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 356—361. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.031
O’Reilly C.A., Chatman J., Caldwell D.F. People and organizational culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit. The Academy of Management Journal, 1991. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 487—516. doi:10.2307/256404
Pratt M.G. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000. Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 456—493. doi:10.2307/2667106
Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2005. Vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 358—384. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
Schneider B. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 1987. Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 437—453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x

PlumX