Representations of justice of parents as factor of moral development of teenagers 882
PhD in Psychology, lecturer, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia
Pedagogue-Psychologist, School No. 2055 Named After Heroes of the Soviet Union Anatoly Zhivov and Yuri Kostikov, Moscow, Russia
Interrelations between representations of parents of justice and features of moral development of the senior teenagers are investigated. The statistical analysis of interrelation between representations of parents and teenagers of justice where positive correlations concerning level of indicators of sensitivity to justice from four positions are found (the victim, the perpetrator, the observer and the beneficiary) is submitted. Positive significant interrelation between the level of conscience of teenagers and fathers are shown; between components of style of education of parents and indicators of sensitivity to justice of teenagers and also representations of teenagers of style of education of their parents. In style of education of parents the most significant were following components: level of a patronage, requirements, satisfactions of needs and projection of children’s qualities to the teenager. Differences in influence of an educational position of mothers and fathers on sensitivity to justice are found in teenagers, in particular negative impact of a maternal infantilization.
Golovei L.A., Danilova M.V., Danilova Y.Y. Samootnoshenie
i otnosheniya so znachimymi vzroslymi kak faktory udovletvorennosti zhizn’yu u
podrostkov [The self- relation and the relations with significant adults as
factors of satisfaction with life of teenagers]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i
obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2017, Vol. 8, no. 1,
pp. 108—125. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080107.
Gulevich O.A. Osnovnye stadii moral’noi sotsializatsii
[Main stages of moral socialization]. In A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich (ed.).
Psikhologiya nravstvennosti. Moscow: Publ. «IPRAN», 2010, pp.
Guseinov A.A. Ponyatiya nasiliya i nenasiliya [Concepts of
violence and non-violence].
Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy questions],
1994, no. 6. pp. 39.
Karmakar R. The impact of perception of consistency and
inconsistency in parenting style on pro-social motives of adolescents.
Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society],
2017. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101—115. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080207. (In Russ.,
аbstr. in Engl.)
Mironenko I.A. Problema nravstvennosti v sovremennoi
rossiiskoi psikhologii [Morality problem in modern Russian psychology]. In
Zhuravlev A.L., Yurevich A.V. (ed.). Psikhologiya nravstvennosti.
Moscow: Publ. «IPRAN», 2010, pp. 15—28.
Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Astanina N.B. Psikhologicheskie
problemy spravedlivosti v zarubezhnoi personologii: teorii i empiricheskie
issledovaniya [Theories and empirical researches of justice in the foreign
personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological
Journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 16—32.
Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [A Theory of Justice].
Novosibirsk: Publ. NGU, 1995. 535 p.
Sobkin V.S., Burelomova A.S., Smyslova M.M. Modern Russian
Adolescents’ Notions of Significant Personal Traits. Sotsial’naia
psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2011, no. 1,
pp. 44—55. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
Hoffman M.L. Moral Development. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.),
Carmichael’s manuals of child psychology. New York, 1970. Vol. 2, pp.
Palmer E.J., Hollin C.R. Sociomoral reasoning perceptions
of parenting and self- reported delinquency in adolescents.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2001. Vol.
37, pp. 822—829.
Siegler R., Children`s Thinking (2-nd ed.). Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991. 528 p.