Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice For AuthorsAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Social Psychology and Society - №2 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2021. Vol. 12, no. 1)

Included in Scopus

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Started in 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Individual values and Internet use: comparison of Russia and European countries 363


Tatarko A.N.
Doctor of Psychology, Chief Research Fellow, Center for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Mironova A.A.
PhD in Sociology, Research Fellow, Institute for Social Policy , National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Maklasova E.V.
Postgraduate Student, Research Intern, Center for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

The article presents results from a cross-cultural study of interrelation between activity of Internet use and individual values of the highest order (S. Schwartz): “Self-Transcen¬dence” — “Self-Enhancement” and “Openness to change” — “Conservation”. The data of the eighth wave of the European Social Research (ESS) was an empirical base of the study. In a comparative perspective, we analyzed the links between Internet use and values in Russia (N=2430), as well as in the three European countries that hold the highest rating in the field of information and communication technologies (ICT Development Index, 2017): Iceland (N=880), Switzerland (N=1519), and UK (N=1926). The data were processed using structural equation modeling (SEM) as well as multigroup structural equation modeling (MGSEM). The study showed that similar between Russia and European countries is the lack of connection between the activity of using the Internet with the values of “Self- Transcendence “, as well as a positive relationship with the values of “Openness to change”. Also, was found the following differences in patterns of relationships: on the sample of Russians value “ Self-Enhancement “ was associated positively with the activity of using the Internet, and on a sample of Western European countries this link is missing, but there is a negative relationship values, “Conservation”, away from the Russians. Based on the data obtained, we supposed how the values of Russians may change in the process of further digitalization of society and increasing involvement in the use of the Internet.

Keywords: digitalization, information and communication technologies, Internet, basic human values, cross-cultural psychology

Column: Empirical Research


For Reference


This work was supported by grant RSF (project №19-18-00169 «The impact of digitalization on social capital and values of Russian society»).



1.                   Berulava G.A. Vliyanie sovremennykh informatsionnykh tekhnologii na kommunikativnye kharakteristiki lichnosti [Influence of modern information technologies on communicative characteristics of personality]. Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya [Humanization of education], 2013, no. 6, pp. 10—15. (In Russ.).

2.                   Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Tsennosti kul’tury i razvitie obshchestva [Cultural values and development of society]. Moscow: Pabl. dom GU VShE, 2007. 527 p.

3.                   Lysak I.V., Belov D.P. Vliyanie informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii na osobennosti kognitivnykh protsessov [The Influence of information and communication technologies on the features of cognitive processes.]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [News of Southern Federal University. Technical science], 2013, no. 5 (142), pp. 256—264. (In Russ.).

4.                   Proniknovenie Interneta v Rossii, GfK. 2017 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Internet intromission in Russia]. URL: issledovanie-gfk proniknovenie-interneta-v-rossii/ (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

5.                   Soldatova G.U., Shlyapnikov V.N. Digital Сompetence of Russian School Teachers. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [ Psychological Science and Education], 2015. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 5—18. doi:10.17759/pse.2015200401. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

6.                   Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Rasskazova E.I., Zotova E.Ju. Tsifrovaya kompetentnost’ rossiiskikh podrostkov i roditelei: rezul’taty vserossiiskogo issledovaniya [Digital competence of Russian teenagers and parents: results of the all-Russian research]. Moscow: Fond Razvitija Internet, 2013. 144 p.

7.                   Tatarko A.N. The relationship of basic human values and voting behavior. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17—37. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080102. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

8.                   Al Omoush K.S., Yaseen S.G., Alma’aitah M.A. The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, no. 28 (6), pp. 2387—2399.

9.                   Albirini A. Cultural perceptions: The missing element in the implementation of ICT in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 2006, no. 2 (1), pp. 49—65.

10.               Alcántara-Pilar J.M., del Barrio-García S., Porcu L. (2013). A cross-cultural analysis of the effect of language on perceived risk online. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, no. 29 (3), pp. 596—603.

11.               Bagchi K.K., Udo G.J., Kirs P.J., Choden K. Internet use and human values: Analyses of developing and developed countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, no. 50, pp. 76—90.

12.               Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A. The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004, no. 55, pp. 573—590.

13.               Calhoun K.J., Teng J., Myun J.C. Impact of national culture on information technology usage behavior: An exploratory study of decision making in Korea and the USA. Behavior and Information Technology, 2002, no. 21 (4), pp. 293—302.

14.               Castells M. End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy. Society and Culture, 1998 (second edition 2000), no. 3 (3), 418 p.

15.               Cyr D., Head M. Website design in an international context: The role of gender in masculine versus feminine oriented countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, no. 29 (4), pp.1358—1367.

16.               Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2007, no. 12 (4), pp. 1143—1168.

17.               Fitzgerald M., Kruschwitz N., Bonnet D., Welch M. Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2014, no. 55 (2), pp. 1—12.

18.               Fogela J., Nehmad E. Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, no. 25 (1), pp. 153—160.

19.               Harrison L.E. Who prospers? How cultural values shape economic and political success. New York: Basic Books, 1992, 288 p.

20.               Harrison L.E., Huntington S.P. (Eds.). Culture matters: How values shape human progress. New York: Basic Books, 2000. 348 p.

21.               Hill C., Loch K., Straub D., El-Sheshai K. A qualitative assessment of Arab culture and information technology transfer. Journal of Global Information Management, 1998, no. 6(3), pp. 29—38.

22.               Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 2001.

23.               ICT Development Index, 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html (Accessed: 26.06.2019).

24.               Inglehart R. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997. 464 p.

25.               Inglehart R., Baker W.E. Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 2000, no. 65 (1), pp. 19—51.

26.               Lebedeva N., Tatarko A. Basic Values in Russia: Their Dynamics, Ethnocultural Differences, and Relation to Economic Attitudes. Psychology in Russia. State of the Art, 2018, no. 11 (3), pp. 36—52.

27.               Lee I., Choi B., Kim J., Hong S. Culture-technology fit: Effects of cultural characteristics on the post-adoption beliefs of mobile internet users. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2007, no. 11(4), pp. 11—51.

28.               Leidner D.E., Kayworth T. Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, 2006, no. 30.2, pp. 357—399.

29.               Loch K., Straub D., Kamel S. Diffusing the internet in the Arab world: The role of social norms and technological culturation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2003, no. 5 (1), pp. 45—63.

30.               McGowan M.K., Cornwell L. Measuring computer literacy through the use of proficiency exams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1999, no. 39 (3), pp. 107—112.

31.               Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation. Berlin: Springer, 1995, pp. 25— 38.

32.               Schwartz S. Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In Iowell R., Roberts C., Fitzgerald R., Eva G. (ed.). Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London: Sage, 2007, pp. 161—193.

33.               Schwartz S. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychol, 1992. Vol. 25 (1), pp. 1—65.

34.               Schwartz S.H., Bardi A. Value hierarchies across culture: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2001, no. 32, pp. 268—290.

35.               Srite M., Karahanna E. The influence of national culture on the acceptance of information technologies: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 2006, no. 30 (3), pp. 679— 704.

36.               Straub D.W. The effect of culture on IT diffusion: e-mail and fax in Japan and the US. Information Systems Research, 1994, no. 5 (1), pp. 23—47.

37.               The Little Data Book on Information Communication and Technology 2018 [Electronic resource]. URL: (Accessed: 10.08.2019).

38.               Surveying the Digital Future. UCLA Center for Communication Policy [Electronic resource]. URL: (Accessed: 12.08.2019).

39.               Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 2003, no. 27 (3), pp. 425—477.

40.               Whitman M.E. Enemy at the gate: Threats to information security. Communications of the ACM, 2003, no. 46 (8), pp. 91—95.

41.               Zhang X., Pablos P.O., Xu Q. Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014, no. 31, pp. 491—498.


© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????