The structure of self-presentation of adolescents in real communication and social networks

964

Abstract

Research objectives are to develop questionnaires to assess the severity of the characteristics of self-presentation of adolescents in real and digital communication spaces, as well as to compare the main structural components of self-presentation of adolescents in real and digital communication spaces. The context and relevance of the study. Modern teens are active users of social networks. At the moment there are not so many scientific works devoted to the study of the characteristics of self-presentation of adolescents and their comparison in real and digital communication spaces. There is a lack of research tools to assess the severity of the characteristics of self-presentation of adolescents. Study design. The study included 6 main stages: 1) the identification of the substantial characteristics of adolescents inherent in real and digital communicative spaces; 2) compilation of two questionnaires to identify the severity of the characteristics of self-presentation in real and digital communicative spaces; 3) a study using these two questionnaires to identify the severity of the characteristics of self-presentation of adolescents; 4) the search for factor structures of components of self-presentation of adolescents; 5) expert analysis of the contents of the identified components and their assignment of names; 6) a comparison of the identified components of the self-presentation of adolescents in real communication and social networking. The sample consisted of 290 teenage students (44% male, 56% female) from grades 6 to 9 of a comprehensive school in Moscow. Methods. To the characteristics of adolescents that are characteristic of them in real and digital communication spaces, we used the author’s modification of the method of M. Kuhn and T. MacPartland “Who Am I?”. To determine the severity of the characteristics of self-presentation of adolescents, two author questionnaires were developed. To search for the factor structures of self-presentation components, an exploratory factor analysis, the principal component method, was used. The calculations were carried out in the SPSS 23.0 program. Results. The strongest and most stable components of the self-presentation of adolescents in the real communicative space and in the communicative space of a social network were revealed — “Friendliness”, “Hostility”, “Talent and Originality”, “Popularity” and “Shyness”. These components have substantial similarities with the known types of self-presentations in domestic and foreign classifications, which confirms their substantial validity. Main conclusions. Private acts of self-presentation of adolescents in the real communicative space and in the communicative space of a social network can be combined into groups that form the structural components of self-presentation. The stable structural components of the self-presentation of adolescents in the real and digital communicative space coincide in meaning, but have internal substantive differences.

General Information

Keywords: adolescence, digital communication, self-presentation, structure of self-presentation, social network, real communication space, digital communication space

Journal rubric: Methodological Tools

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110111

For citation: Fyodorov V.V. The structure of self-presentation of adolescents in real communication and social networks . Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 180–192. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110111. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

 

  1. Bozhovich L.I. Lichnost’ i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. Saint-Peterburg: Piter, 2008. 398 p.
  2. Zhichkina A.E. Osobennosti sotsial’noi pertseptsii v Internete [Features of social perception on the Internet]. Mir psikhologii [World of psychology], 1999, no. 3. pp. 72—80. (In Russ.).
  3. Nasledov A.D. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 i AMOS: professional’nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh [IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional Statistical Data Analysis]. Saint-Peterburg: Piter, 2013. 416 p.: il.
  4. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psikhosemantiki [The Basics of Psychosemantics]. 3-e izd. Moscow: Eksmo, 2010. 480 p.
  5. Petrovskii A.V., Petrovskii V.A. Individ i ego potrebnost’ byt’ lichnost’yu [The individual and his need to be a person]. Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy Issues], 1982, no 3, pp. 44—53. (In Russ.).
  6. Pikuleva O.A. Psikhologiya samoprezentatsii lichnosti: Monografiya [Psychology of Personality Self-Presentation: Monograph]. Moscow: INFA-M, 2015. 320 p.
  7. Tolstykh N.N., Prikhozhan A. M. Psikhologiya podrostkovogo vozrasta : uchebnik i praktikum dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Psychology of adolescence: a textbook and workshop for academic undergraduate]. Moscow: Publ. Yurait, 2016. 408 p.
  8. Fyodorov V.V., Mileev I.D. Motivation in Teenage Users of Social Media . Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2015. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 98—108. doi: 10.17759/sps.2015060307 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  9. Khoroshikh V.V. Osobennosti samoprezentatsii pol’zovatelei sotsial’nogo saita «Vkontakte» [Features of self-presentation of users of the social site “Vkontakte”]. In Sventsitskii A.L. (ed.) Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii “Anan’evskie chteniya — 2011. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i zhizn’” (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 18—20 oktyabrya 2011 g.) [Proceedings of Scientific Conference “Ananiev Readings — 2011. Social Psychology and Life”]. Saint-Peterburg: Publ. S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2011, pp. 44—45.
  10. Chaldini R. Psikhologiya vliyaniya [Psychology of influence]. Saint-Peterburg: Piter Kom, 1999. 272 p.
  11. El’konin D.B. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected Psychological Works]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. 560 p.
  12. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1959, 259 p.
  13. Jones E.E. Interpersonal perception, NY, 1990, 256 p.
  14. Lee S.J., Quigley B.M., Nesler M.S., Corbett A.B., Tedeschi J. Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999, 26, pp. 701—722.
  15. Rosenfeld P., Giacalone R., Riordan C. Impression management: building and enhancing reputations at work. London, Thomson Learning, 2002, 244 p.
  16. Schlenker B. Self-presentation. In M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (eds.), Handbook of self and identity . The Guilford Press, 2003, pp.488—518.
  17. Schutz A. Self-presentational tactics of talk-show guests: a comparison of politicians, experts and entertainers. Journal of Psychology, 1998, 132(6), pp. 611—628.

 

Information About the Authors

Valery V. Fyodorov, Senior lecturer at the Department of Social Psychology, Senior Researcher of Scientific and Practical Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research PsyDATA, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-3775, e-mail: val.vl.fed@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1677
Previous month: 43
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 964
Previous month: 25
Current month: 9