Mass Psychology and Social History

Objectives. Analyze the historical process and in particular the movements of the masses not from the familiar for Russian researchers positions of famous Karl Marx’s thesis: “being determines consciousness”, but from the opposite point of view — social existence is determined by the state of public social consciousness, with the purpose to see how the transformation of social consciousness towards its decollectivization and demythologization, that creates shocking mental discomfort, generates mass social movements unconsciously seeking back in time, which predetermines the course of social history. Background. Naive-spontaneous “materialism” of ordinary consciousness, but, even more surprising, scientists’ psychologists, makes it difficult to understand the real determinants of human behavior, that is, the fact that in the basis of individual behavior, and public life, and history in general lies not politics, not economics, but social psychology, that, contrary to the well-known Lenin’s’ aphorism, politics and economics are a concentrated representation of psychology. Methodology. Theoretical analysis of socio-philosophical and psychological literature; comparative-historical analysis. Conclusions. Transformation of public consciousness initiates the creation of utopian projects oriented into the past. Utopias evoke powerful social movements of the masses, fascinated by the irrational idea of returning to the “golden age,” in paradise. Thus, the dynamics of social-historical processes are determined not by economics and politics, but by the logic of the transformation of the archaic collective consciousness in the course of its individualization and demythologization.

 

1. Avgustin Avrelii. Ispoved’ [Confession]. Moscow: Respublika, 1992. 335 p. (In Russ.).
2. Averintsev S.S. Dva rozhdeniya evropeiskogo ratsionalizma [Two births the European rationalism]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1989, no. 3, pp. 4—15. (In Russ.).
3. Akhiezer, A. S. Arkhaizatsiya v rossiiskom obshchestve kak metodologicheskaya problema [Arhaizacija in Russian society as a methodological problem]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity], 2001, no. 2, pp. 89—100. (In Russ.).
4. Batkin L.M. Ital’yanskoe Vozrozhdenie v poiskakh individual’nosti [Italian Renaissance in search of individuality]. Moscow: Nauka,1989. 271 p. (In Russ.).
5. Bell D. Myatezh protiv sovremennosti [Revolt against Modernity]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 1992, no. 5, pp. 105—111. (In Russ.).
6. Bergson A. Dva istochnika morali i religii [The Two Sources of Morality and Religion]. Moscow: Kanon, 1994. 384p. (In Russ.).
7. Bocharov V.V. Vlast’ i tabu: o kul’turno-psikhologicheskikh istokakh traditsionalizma [Power and Taboo: On the Cultural-Psychological Sources of Traditionalism]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 2017. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 109— 117. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). DOI: 10.17759/chp.2017130412
8. Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. M. Veber. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 44—271. (In Russ.).
9. Gadamer G.-G. Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo [The Relevance of Beautiful]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1991. 375 p. (In Russ.).
10. Galeev K. Skazka pro Zonderveg: Dukhovnost’ kak neudachnaya kal’ka s nemetskogo [Fairy tale about Zonderveg: spirituality as unsuccessful vellum from German]. Novaya gazeta [New newspaper], 2016, no. 51ot 16 maya. (In Russ.).
11. Golosovker Ya.E. Logika mifa [Logic of myth]. Moscow: Nauka, 1987. 218 p. (In Russ.).
12. Gudkov L.D. Fenomen prostoty (o natsional’nom samosoznanii russkikh) [Phenomenon simplicity (of the national identity of Russian)]. Chelovek [Human being], 1991, no. 1, pp. 9—22. (In Russ.).
13. Gusserl’ E. Krizis evropeiskogo chelovechestva i filosofiya [Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1986, no. 3, pp. 103—136. (In Russ.).
14. Gyunter G. Zhanrovye problemy utopii v «Chevengure» A. Platonova [Genre Problems of utopia in “Čevengure” by A. Platonov]. Utopija i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow: Progress, pp. 252—277. (In Russ.).
15. Dyurkgeim E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda [The Division of Labor in Society]. Moscow: Nauka,1991. 573 p. (In Russ.).
16. Zotov V. Kitai: «dukh Lei Fena» protiv «burzhuaznoi liberalizatsii» [China: “The Spirit of Lei Feng against bourgeois liberalization]. Inostrannaya literature [Foreign literature], 1990, no. 8, pp. 210—238. (In Russ.).
17. Kassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke. Vvedenie v filosofiyu chelovecheskoi kul’tury [The essay on man. An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences], no. 7, pp. 102—146. (In Russ.).
18. Kautskii K. Predshestvenniki noveishego sotsializma. Kommunisticheskie dvizheniya v Srednie veka [Predecessors newest socialism. The Communist movement in the middle ages]. Moscow: Librokom, 2012. 243 p. (In Russ.).
19. Laski M. Utopiya i revolyutsiya [Utopia and Revolution]. Utopija i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow: Progress, pp. 170—210. (In Russ.).
20. Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass [The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind]. St. Petersburg: Maket, 1995. 316 p. (In Russ.).
21. Lebon G. Psikhologiya sotsializma [Psychology of Socialism]. St. Petersburg: Maket, 1995. 544 p. (In Russ.).
22. Levi-Bryul’ L. Sverkh”estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii [Primitives and the supernatural]. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press, 1994. 608 p. (In Russ.).
23. Lokk Dzh. Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii: v 3 t. T. 1. [Essay Concerning Human Understanding: in 3 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1985. 621 p. (In Russ.).
24. Losev A.F. Znak, simvol, mif [Sign. Symbol. Myth]. Moscow: Publ. MGU, 1982. 480 p.
25. Maraval’ Kh. Utopiya i reformism [Utopia and reformism]. Utopija i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow: Progress, 1991, pp. 210—232. (In Russ.).
26. Memford L. Mif mashiny [Machine myth]. Utopija i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow: Progress, 1991, pp. 79—97.
27. Menyuel’ F., Menyuel’ Fr. Utopicheskoe myshlenie v zapadnom mire mire [Utopian Thought in Western World]. Utopija i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow: Progress, 1991, pp. 21—48. (In Russ.).
28. Nemirovskii V.G. Krasnye, zelenye, belye… [Red, Green, White ..]. Chelovek [Human being], 1992, no. 3, pp. 69—73. (In Russ.).
29. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass [Revolt of the Masses]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1989, no. 3, pp. 119—158. (In Russ.).
30. Pozanenko A.A. Samoizoliruyushchiesya soobshchestva. Sotsial’naya struktura poselenii rodovykh pomestii [Self-isolated Communities — The Social Structure of Kin’s Domain Settlements]. Mir Rossii [Russia’s world], 2016, no. 1, pp. 129—153. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
31. Semechkin N.I. Psikhologicheskie koordinaty raya [Psychological co-ordinates of Paradise]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 2015, no. 8, pp. 64—75. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
32. Strada V. Natsionalizm russkii, natsionalizm sovetskii, postnatsionalizm [The Russian Nationalism, Soviet nationalism, Postnacionalizm]. Chelovek [Human being], 1991, no. 6, pp. 60—82. (In Russ.).
33. Toinbi A. Dzh. Postizhenie istorii [A study of history]. Moscow: Progress, 1991. 736 p. (In Russ.).
34. Triandis G. S. Kul’tura i sotsial’noe povedenie [Culture and social behavior]. Moscow: Forum, 2007. 384 p. (In Russ.).
35. Freid Z. Psikhologiya mass i analiz chelovecheskogo Ya [Mass Psychology and the Analysis of the «I»]. Totem i tabu. St. Petersburg — Moscow: Olimp; «AST-LTD», 1998, pp. 279—348. (In Russ.).
36. Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv’. Issledovanie magii i religii [The golden bough. A study of magic and religion]. Moscow: Politizdat,1980. 832 p. (In Russ.).
37. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom]. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 272 p. (In Russ.).
38. Chaadaev P.Ya. Stat’i i pis’ma [Articles and the letters]. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1989. 180 p. (In Russ.).
39. Engel’s F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoi sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [Origin of the family, private property and the State]. Marks K., Engel’s F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 3 t. T. 3. [Featured Works: v 3 vol. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Politizdat. 1970, pp. 211—370. (In Russ.).
40. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and symbol]. Moscow: Renessans, 1991. 300 p. (In Russ.).
41. Hou Y. The Role of Religious Force in the Wukan Incident. The China Nonprofit Review. 2013. Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 155—175.
42. Rozin P., Millman L., Nemeroff C. Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986. Vol. 50, Iss. 4, pp. 703—712.
43. Shih Y-K. The Isomorphism of Family and State and the Integration of Church and State: On the Differences between the Confucian Political Tradition and Democratic Politics. In Cao T., Zhong X., Liao K. (eds.). Culture and Social Transformations in Reform Era China. Leiden, 2010, pp. 97—118. DOI:10.1163/ej. 9789004175167.i-447
44. Tong Y. Morality, benevolence, and responsibility: Regime legitimacy in China from past to the present. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2011. Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 141—159.