Social Psychology and Society
2020. Vol. 11, no. 3, 35–50
doi:10.17759/sps.2020110303
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)
Dyadic Coping Strategies of Spouses as a Factor in Latent Dysfunctional Relationships in the Family: an Empirical Study in a Pandemic
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: dyadic coping strategies, family coping, inter-marital relationships, social deprivation of the family
Journal rubric: Empirical Research
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110303
For citation: Bonkalo T.I., Marinova T.Y., Feoktistova S.V., Shmeleva S.V. Dyadic Coping Strategies of Spouses as a Factor in Latent Dysfunctional Relationships in the Family: an Empirical Study in a Pandemic. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 35–50. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110303. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
1. Bonkalo T.I. Osobennosti diadicheskikh koping-strategii suprugov v sem’yakh raznogo
urovnya funktsional’noi deesposobnosti [Features of dyadic coping strategies of spouses in families
of different levels of functional capacity]. Izvestiya samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii
nauk = News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. Vol. 11,
no. 4—6, pp. 1476—1480.
2. Dubrov D.I. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye tekhnologii i semeinye otnosheniya: vred ili
pol’za? [Information and communication technologies and family relationships: harm or benefit?].
Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social psychology and society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72—
91. DOI:10.17759/sps.2020110105
3. Ekimchik O.A., Kryukova T.L. Diadicheskii koping v rossiiskikh parakh: issledovanie
psikhometricheskikh kachestv Oprosnika diadicheskogo sovladaniya G. Bodenmanna [Elektronnyi
resurs] [Dyadic coping in Russian couples: a study of psychometric qualities of G. Bodenmann’s
Dyadic Coping Questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Research, 2017.
Vol. 10, no. 55, pp. 4. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed: 25.04.2020).
4. Koreneva E.P. Psikhologiya semeinogo krizisa: podkhody k semeinomu konsul’tirovaniyu
pri nenormativnykh krizisakh [Elektronnyi resurs] [Psychology of family crisis: approaches to
family counseling in non-normative crises]. Kontsept = Concept, 2019, no. 3, pp. 102—107. DOI
10.24411/2304-120X-2019-12012
5. Koroleva E.M., Kryukova T.L. Issledovanie diadicheskogo kopinga: rol’ v ukreplenii
supruzheskikh otnoshenii i psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya pary [Study of dyadic coping: a role
in strengthening marital relations and psychological well-being of a couple] Vestnik Kostromskogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta: seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Bulletin of Kostroma
State University: Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2018, no. 2, pp. 84—88.
6. Kuftyak E.V. Kontseptsiya semeinogo sovladaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [The concept of family
coping]. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii = Medical psychology in Russia, 2012, no. 5 (16). URL:
http://www.medpsy.ru/mprj/archiv_global/2012_5_16/nomer/nomer10.php (Accessed: 18.04.2020).
7. Kryukova T.L. Metody izucheniya sovladayushchego povedeniya: tri koping—shkaly:
[metodicheskoe rukovodstvo] Methods for studying coping behavior: three coping scales:
[methodological guide]. Kostroma: Avantitul,] 2007. 64 p.
8. Rasskazova E.I., Gordeeva T.O., Osin E.N. Koping-strategii v strukture deyatel’nosti i
samoregulyatsii: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki i vozmozhnosti primeneniya metodiki COPE
[Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: psychometric characteristics and
the possibility of using the COPE methodology]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki =
Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82—118.
9. Rostovskaya T.K., Karpovskaya E.E. Izuchenie osobennostei semeino-demograficheskoi
politiki kak faktora izmenenii molodoi sem’i: sotsiologicheskii analiz [Study of the peculiarities of
family and demographic policy as a factor of changes in a young family: a sociological analysis].
Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie = Scientific result. Sociology and Management, 2019.
Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 53—56.
10. Feoktistova S.V., Marinova T.Yu., Vasil’eva N.N. Psikhologiya: uchebnoe posobie dlya
akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Psychology: Study Guide for Academic Bachelor’s Degree]. 2-e izd.
Moscow: Publ. OOO “Yurayt”, 2017. 241 p.
11. Tsvetkova N.A. Osobennosti koping-strategii, ispol’zuemykh dlya razresheniya konfliktov v
sem’yakh s raznym stazhem braka [Features of coping strategies used to resolve conflicts in families
with different length of marriage]. Razvitie lichnosti = Personal Development, 2018, no. 1, pp. 95—104.
12. Eidemiller E.G., Yustitskis V.V. Psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya sem’i [Family psychology and
psychotherapy]. 4-e izd. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 672 p.
13. Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T.A. Revenson,
K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (eds.). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping.
Washington: DC: American Psychological Association, 2005, pp. 33—49.
14. Bouchard G., Guillemette A., Landry-Leger N. Situational and dispositional coping: an
examination of their personality, cognitive appraisals and psychological distress. European Journal
of Personality, 2004. Vol. 18, pp. 221—238.
15. Campbell A. An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening
community collaborations to save lives [Elektronnyi resurs]. Forensic Science International: Reports.
2020. Vol. 2. DOI:10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089
16. Coyne J.C., Smith D.A. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective
on wives’ distress. Journ. Personal. Soc. Psychol, 1991. Vol. 61 (3), pp. 404—412.
17. Hardie E., Critchley C., Morris Z. Self-coping complexity: role of self-construal in relational.,
individual and collective coping styles and health outcomes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,
2006. Vol. 9, pp. 224—235.
18. Hobfoll S.E., Wells J.D., Lavin J. Resource loss, resource gain, and communal coping during
pregnancy among women with multiple roles. Psychol. Women Q, 1997. Vol. 21 (4), pp. 645—662.
19. Lazarus R.S. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine,
1993, pp. 234—247.
20. Lasarus R. Emotions and interpersonal relationships: toward a person-centered conceptualization
of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 2006. Vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 9—43.
21. Liu H., Zhang F., Wei C., Jia Y. Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak
in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychiatry Research,
2020. Vol. 287. 112921. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
22. Miceli M. Castelfranchi C. Further distinction between coping and defensive mechanisms.
Journal of Personality, 2001. Vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 287—296.
23. Wind T.R., Rijkeboer M., Andersson G., Riper H. The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’
for mental health care and a turning point for e-health [Elektronnyi resurs]. Internet Interventions,
2020. Vol. 20. 100317. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 1115
Previous month: 28
Current month: 34
Downloads
Total: 1221
Previous month: 32
Current month: 32