Socio-Psychological Predictors of Belief in Conspiracy Theories of the Origin of COVID-19 and Involvement in Social Media

Objective. Search for socio-psychological antecedents for the individual’s belief in conspiracy theories of the origin of the pandemic. Revealing the dynamics of Internet users’ attitudes to the coronavirus pandemic in March-early June 2020. Background. As part of the study of the psychological mechanisms of the impact of the pandemic on the individual and society, an increasingly urgent task is to clarify the socio-psychological prerequisites of belief in conspiracy theories of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the relationship between attitudes towards the pandemic and the involvement of the individual in the use of social media. Study design. The paper presents the results of two online surveys conducted in March-April and May-June 2020 to study the dynamics of Russians’ belief in conspiracy theories of the origin of the COVID-19, taking into account involvement in social media and gender differences. Participants. The first study involved 668 people (78.2% women) aged 17 to 80 years (M=30; SD=12.7); the second survey involved 986 people (56.9% — men) aged 18 to 76 years (M=36.63; SD=10.2). The survey geography covered various regions of Russia. Measurements. The basic tool in both studies was developed by T.A. Nestik questionnaire “Attitude towards the epidemiological threat”. The first study additionally measured the social axioms (SAS), moral foundations (MFQ), belief in the justice of the world and trust in social institutions. The second study additionally measured involvement in social media communications. Results. The 1st study found a connection between conspiracy beliefs and belief in a just world, low self-efficacy, moral foundations of ingroup/loyalty and authority/respect, low institutional trust, and social cynicism. In the 2nd study, it was shown that, compared to March-April, the level of belief of social media users in conspiracy theories of the origin of the pandemic, the severity of distrust in the health care system and skepticism about vaccinations significantly increased; both the fear of infection and the controllability of the threat have become less, but fears of a recurrence of epidemics have increased. It is shown that involvement in social media increases anxiety about the consequences of the coronavirus crisis, which in turn intensifies the search for conspiracy explanations of pandemic. Conclusions. Low social trust and the experience of an uncontrollable threat increase the susceptibility of social media users to belief in conspiracy theories of the origin of the pandemic.

 

1.        Arhipova A., Burkova V., Godina E., Lebedeva L., Mihel’ D., Pautova L., Sadykov R., Hristoforova O. Strahi i mifologiya pandemii: kak menyayutsya obydennye predstavleniya i praktiki lyudej [Elektronnyi resurs] [Pandemic fears and mythology: how everyday ideas and practices of people are changing]. KoronaFOM = CrownFORM. 07.07.2020. URL: https://covid19.fom.ru/ post/strahi-i-mifologiya-pandemii-kak-oni-menyayut-obydennye-predstavleniya-i-praktiki-lyudej (Accessed 09.07.2020). (In Russ.).

2.        Belinskaya E.P., Agadullina E.R. Perezhivanie otnositel’noi deprivatsii kak faktor koping-strategii izbeganiya v setevoi kommunikatsii [Relative deprivation and an avoidance coping in network communication]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 92—106. DOI:10.17759/sps.2020110106 (In Russ.).

3.        Bykhovets Yu.V., Kogan-Lerner L.B. Pandemiya COVID-19 kak mnogofaktornaya psikhotravmiruyushchaya situatsiya [Pandemic covid-19 as a multifactorialtraumatic situation]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 115—153. (In Russ.).

4.        Deyneka O.S., Zabelina E.V., Vinogradov YU.V. Otnoshenie rossiyan k denezhno-kreditnoj politike do krizisa COVID-19 i na ego fone [The attitude of russians to monetary policy before the covid-19 crisis and on its background]. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social’naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 189—220. DOI:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.006 (In Russ.).

5.        Deyneka O.S., Maksimenko A.A. Ocenka psihologicheskogo sostoyaniya obshchestva v usloviyah infodemii posredstvom analiza social’nyh setej: obzor zarubezhnyh publikacij [The psychological state of society in infodemia by analysis of social networks: an overview of foreign publications]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie = Society. Environment. Development, 2020, no. 2, pp. 28—39. (In Russ.).

6.        Enikolopov S.N., Kaz’mina O.Yu., Vorontsova O.Yu., Medvedeva T.I., Boiko O.M. Dinamika psikhologicheskikh reaktsii na nachal’nom etape pandemii COVID-19 [Dynamics of Psychological Reactions at the Start of the Pandemic of COVID-19]. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 108—126. (In Russ.).

7.        Indeks strakha: men’she vsego COVID-19 boyatsya v Peterburge, na Kavkaze i v Sibiri [Elektronnyi resurs] [Fear Index: The least fear of COVID-19 is in St. Petersburg, the Caucasus and Siberia]. Rosgosstrakh Zhizn’ = Rosgosstrakh Life 27 aprelya 2020 g. URL: https://rgsl.ru/news/ indeks-strakha-menshe-vsego-covid-19-boyatsya-v-peterburge-na-kavkaze-i-v-sibiri/ (Accessed: 20.06.2020). (In Russ.).

8.        Issledovanie sotsial’nykh effektov pandemii COVID-19 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Research on the social effects of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Svodka#12. 26.05.2020. Moscow: TsSP «Platforma», 2020. URL: https://pltf.ru/2020/05/26/omi-i-platforma-sociologija-krizisa-3/ (Accessed: 27.05.2020). (In Russ.).

9.        Kubrak T.A., Latynov V.V. Vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya informatsionno-psikhologicheskogo vozdeistviya v situatsii pandemii koronavirusa [Opportunities and limitations of informationpsychological influence in the situation of the coronavirus pandemi]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 84—114. DOI:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.003 (In Russ.).

10.    Kovaleva Yu.V., Zhuravlev A.L. Obshchestvennoe nastroenie i sub”ektnost’ setevogo soobshchestva v period pandemii COVID-19: na primere sotsial’noi seti Tvitter [Social mood and subjectivity of network community during the pandemic covid-19: using the example of social network twitter]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 154—188. DOI:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.005 (In Russ.).

11.    Nestik T.A. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na obshchestvo: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii analiz [The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on society: socio-psychological analysis]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 47—82. DOI:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.002 (In Russ.)

12.    Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Psihologiya global’nyh riskov [Psychology of global risks]. Moscow: In-t psikhologii RAN, 2018 (In Russ.).

13.    Rasskazova E.I., Leont’ev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub”ektivnomu blagopoluchiyu: trevoga i sovladanie [Pandemic as a Challenge to Subjective Well-Being:

Anxiety and Coping]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2020. Vol. 28, no 2, pp. 90—108. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2020280205 (In Russ.).

14.    Sotsiologiya pandemii. Proekt CoronaFOM [Elektronnyi resurs] [Sociology of the pandemic. CoronaFOM project]. URL: https://covid19.fom.ru (Accessed: 18.05.2020). (In Russ.).

15.    Tkhostov A.Sh., Rasskazova E.I. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie trevogi i profilaktiki v situatsii infodemii: zashchita ot koronavirusa ili «porochnyi krug» trevogi? [Psychological contents of anxiety and the prevention in an infodemic situation: protection against coronavirus or the “vicious circle” of anxiety?]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2. pp. 70—89. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2020280204 (In Russ.).

16.    Ushakov D.V., Yurevich A.V., Yurevich M.A. Ekspertnyj opros o psihologicheskom kontekste koronavirusnoj epidemii [Expert survey on the psychological context of the coronavirus epidemic]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2020. Vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 115—153. (In Russ.).

17.    Fedorov V. Obshchestvennye nastroeniya v Rossii v situatsii koronakrizisa [Elektronnyi resurs] [Public sentiment in Russia in the situation of coronavirus crisis]. VTsIOM, 2020. URL: https:// wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/reports_conferences/2020/2020-06-16_Lenskii_klub.pdf (Accessed: 20.06.2020). (In Russ.).

18.    Fedosenko E.V. Zhizn’ posle karantina: psikhologiya smyslov i koronavirus COVID-19 [Life after the quarantine: psychology of sense and coronavirus covid-19]. Psikhologicheskie problemy smysla zhizni i acme = Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme, 2020, no. 1, pp. 34—47. (In Russ.).

19.    Cherkashina A. O koping-strategiyakh vo vremena COVID-19 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Coping strategies during COVID-19]. 28 may 2020. URL: https://www.facebook.com/anastasia.cherkashina.1/ posts/2984238751630133?__cft__[0]=AZU5mT_4EcG8lnc6yDnei_lh2xosUMANMkLdNHO Jz0qNDfvyLHvPP6IzEqHT_y70jF4ajkdaUORRmmjGsZNH2vbBAsCo5AQLKv9J_dGJ1X-- LqjwBoHUiWKCx3F0HKGgllg&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R (Accessed: 22.05.2020). (In Russ.).

20.    Ahmed M.Z., Ahmed O., Aibao Zh., Hanbin S., Siyu L., Ahmad A. Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, June 2020. Vol. 51, 102092.

21.    Allington D., Duffy B., Wessely S., Dhavan N., Rubin J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 2020, pp. 1—7. DOI:10.1017/S003329172000224X

22.    Alper S., Bayrak F., Yilmaz O. Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current psychology, 2020, pp. 1—10. Advance online publication. DOI:10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0

23.    Barua Z., Barua S., Aktar S., Kabir N., Li M. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020. Vol. 8, 100119 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119

24.    Depoux A., Martin S, Karafillakis E., Preet R. Wilder-Smith A., Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine, 2020. DOI:10.1093/jtm/taaa031/5775501

25.    Goreis A., Voracek M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205

26.    Leone L., Giacomantonio M., Lauriola M. Moral foundations, worldviews, moral absolutism and belief in conspiracy theories. International journal of psychology, 2019. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 197— 204. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12459

27.    Lobato E.J., Powell M., Padilla L.M., Holbrook C. Factors Predicting Willingness to Share COVID-19 Misinformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566108

28.    Sternisko A., Cichocka A., Cislak A., Van Bavel J.J. Collective narcissism predicts the belief and dissemination of conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic. PREPRINT, 2020. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/4c6av

29.    Šrol J., Mikušková E.B., Cavojova V. When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. PREPRINT, 2020. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/f9e6p

30.    Sullivan D., Landau M.J., Rothschild Z.K. An existential function of enemyship: evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010. Vol. 98 (3), pp. 434—449. DOI:10.1037/a0017457

31.    UN Policy Brief: COVID-19 and the need for action on mental health, 2020 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/UN-Policy-Brief-COVID-19- and-mental-health.pdf (Accessed 25.07.2020).

32.    van Prooijen J.W. Suspicions of Injustice: The Sense-Making Function of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. In Kals E., Maes J. (eds.). Justice and Conflicts. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 121—132. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_7