Russian Psychological Issues PsyJournals.ru
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice Manuscript SubmissionAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Social Psychology and Society - №3 / 2021 | Перейти к описанию
Scopus
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2021. Vol. 12, no. 2)

Included in Scopus

Social Psychology and Society

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 2221-1527

ISSN (online): 2311-7052

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published since 2010

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal

 

Subjective Well-Being in Early Adulthood and Psychological Distance to the Objects of the Socio-Psychological Space during COVID-19 Pandemic 276

|

Yaremtchuk S.V.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Education Psychology, Amur State University of Humanities and Pedagogy , Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1036-6826
e-mail: svj@rambler.ru

Bakina A.V.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Education Psychology, Amur State University of Humanities and Pedagogy, Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-3743
e-mail: bakina_anna@mail.ru

Abstract
Objective. Study of changes in the young people subjective well-being during the initial period of COVID-19 distribution and its relationship with the subjective distance to the objects of the socio-psychological space of the individual. Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the global challenges in 2020, creating obstacles to meeting the urgent needs of people. Young people aged 18—24 are one of the most vulnerable groups in terms of psychological well-being, which makes it important to study their reactions during the pandemic. Study design. The study was conducted from April 14 to June 16, 2020 in the Khabarovsk region. Data was collected remotely. To identify changes during the pandemic, the sample data was compared with the results of a study, which had been conducted in February 2019. Participants. Sample 2019: 139 subjects (45 males and 94 females, aged 18—24, M=20). Sample 2020: 130 subjects (40 males and 90 females, aged 18—24, M=19.5). Measurements. The subjective well-being of young people was measured on a scale of global life satisfaction and subjective happiness. To study the psychological distance of social contacts, a modified method of A.B. Kupreichenko was used. Results. The significant increase in life satisfaction among young people was registered. Under the pandemic conditions, increased satisfaction is associated with proximity to a wide range of social groups. Сonclusions. The subjective well-being in early adulthood during the pandemic is associated with focus on social contacts, which creates conditions for the effective use of internal and external resources.

Keywords: subjective well-being, psychological distance, COVID-19, socio-psychological space, youth

Column: Empirical Research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120103

For Reference

Funding

The reported study was funded by Ministry of Education and Science of the Khabarovsk Region, project number 57C/2020 “Socio-psychological space of the youth of the Far East during the pandemic”.

References

1.        COVID-19: psikhologicheskie effekty epidemii. Chem pomoch’ medikam? [COVID-19: Psychological Effects of the Pandemic. How to Help Healthcare Workers?]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 190—196. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2020280211. (In Russ.).

2.        Antsyferova L.I. Lichnost’ v trudnykh zhiznennykh usloviyakh: pereosmyslivanie, preobrazovanie situatsii i psikhologicheskaya zashchita [Personality in difficult life conditions: rethinking, transformation of situations and psychological protection]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological journal, 1994. Vol. 1, pp. 3—18. (In Russ.).

3.        Deeva N.A. Komponenty protsessa perezhivaniya kak determinanty sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [Components of experience as determinants of subjective well-being personality]. Vestnik KRU MVD Rossii = Bulletin of Krasnodar University of Russian. MIA, 2016. Vol. 1(31), pp. 217—222. (In Russ.).

4.        Enikolopov S.N. et al. Dynamics of Psychological Reactions at the Start of the Pandemic of COVID-19 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological- Educational Studies, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 108—126. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2020120207. (In Russ.).

5.        Zhuravlev A.L., Kupreichenko A.B. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti [The socio-psychological space of the person]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2012. 496 p. (In Russ.).

6.        Zotova O.Yu. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti [Psychological well-being of the individual.]. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyi universitet, 2017. 312 p. (In Russ.).

7.        Karapetyan L.V. Faktory formirovaniya sub”ektivnogo neblagopoluchiya [Factors of Formation of Subjective Not Well-Being]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Psikhologiya» = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Psychology, 2017. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12—25. DOI:10.14529/psy170102. (In Russ.).

8.        Leontiev D.A. Samoregulyatsiya, resursy i lichnostnyi potentsial [Autoregulation, resources, and personality potential]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Siberian journal of psychology, 2016. Vol. 62, pp. 18—37. DOI:10.17223/17267080/62/3. (In Russ.).

9.        Litvinova G.V. Osobennosti psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya podrostkov (regional’nyi aspekt) [Psychological well-being of adolescents (regional aspect)]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi zaochnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya pedagogiki i psikhologii» = Problems and prospects for the development of pedagogy and psychology. Chast’ I. Novosibirsk: Publ. «Apriori», 2011, pp. 84—93. (In Russ.).

10.    Lysenko S.V. Sovremennye predstavleniya o pozitivnykh resursakh lichnosti, obespechivayushchikh preodolenie trudnykh zhiznennykh situatsii [Modern ideas of personal positive res ources providing difficult life situations overcoming]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2013. Vol. 12(128), pp. 265—271. (In Russ.).

11.    Nartova-Bochaver S.K. «Coping — behavior» v sisteme ponyatii psikhologii lichnosti [“Coping behavior’’ in the system of concepts of the psychology of personality]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1997. Vol. 18(5), pp. 20—30. (In Russ.).

12.    Pokhil’ko A.D., Shabashova N.M. Izmeneniya obshchestvennogo soznaniya pod vliyaniem sovremennoi pandemii [Changes to public consciousness under the influence of modern pandemic]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki = The Humanities and social sciences, 2020. Vol. 2, pp. 75—81. DOI:10.18522/2070-1403-2020-79-2-75-81. (In Russ.).

13.    Sorokin M.Yu. et al. Psikhologicheskie reaktsii naseleniya kak faktor adaptatsii k pandemii COVID-19 [Psychological reactions of the population as a factor of adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M.Bekhtereva = V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology, 2020. Vol. 2, pp. 87—94. DOI:10.31363/2313-7053- 2020-2-87-94. (In Russ.).

14.    Rasskazova E.I., Leont’ev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub”ektivnomu blagopoluchiyu: trevoga i sovladanie [Pandemic as a Challenge to Subjective Well-Being:

Anxiety and Coping]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 90—108. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2020280205. (In Russ.).

15.    Gafiatulina N.Kh. et al. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo v usloviyakh samoizolyatsii. Sotsial’nye effekty i posledstviya pandemii COVID-19 [Russian society in self-isolation. Social Effects and Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Moscow: RUSAINS, 2020. 178 p. (In Russ.).

16.    Sokolovskaya T.A., Bakhadova E.V. Trevozhnost’ i samoaktualizatsiya lichnosti kak emotsional’nyi kognitivnyi i povedencheskii otvet na samoizolyatsiyu v period COVID-19: novye vyzovy dlya obshchestvennogo zdorov’ya [Anxiety and self-actualization of personality as an emotional cognitive and behavioral response to self-insulation during COVID-19: new challenges for public health]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki = Scientific Review. Medical sciences, 2020. Vol. 3, pp. 64—70. (In Russ.).

17.    Sorokoumova E.A. et al. Studenty v period pandemii COVID-19: ponimanie situatsii samoizolyatsii [Students during the coronavirus pandemic: understanding the situation of self-isolation]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Ekonomika i pravo = Scientific review. Economics and law, 2020. Vol. 3, pp. 196—205. DOI:10.26653/2076-4650-2020-3-18 (In Russ.).

18.    Suchkova O.V. Psihologicheskaja funkcija religii — obespechenie bezopasnosti dlja verujushhej molodezhi [Psychological function of religion — providing security for religious young people]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija = Modern problems of science and education, 2008. Vol. 3, pp. 84—89. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=745 (Accessed: 10.08.2020). (In Russ.).

19.    Ul’yanina O.A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie riski dlya cheloveka i obshchestva v usloviyakh pandemii [Socio-Psychological Risks of a Person and Society in the Context of a Pandemic]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Pedagogika i psikhologiya» = MCU Vestnik. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020. Vol. 2, pp. 46—54. DOI:10.25688/2076-9121.2020.52.2.05. (In Russ.).

20.    Kholodova Yu.B. Osobennosti perezhivaniya trevogi v period pandemii COVID-19 predstavitelyami raznykh vozrastnykh grupp [Features of anxiety associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in different age groups]. International Journal Of Medicine And Psychology, 2020. Vol. 2(3), pp. 114—117. (In Russ.).

21.    Shamionov R.M. Sub”ektivnoe blagopoluchie lichnosti: psikhologicheskaya kartina i factory [Subjective well-being of the person: psychological picture and factors]. Saratov: Publ. «Nauchnaya kniga», 2008. 296 p. (In Russ.).

22.    Shiryaeva O.S. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti [Psychological well-being in extreme climatic conditions of life. PhD (Psychology) Thesis]. Khabarovsk, 2008. 26 p. (In Russ.).

23.    Yaremtchuk S.V. Sootnoshenie urovnya sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya i stremleniya cheloveka k izmeneniyam [Ratio of subjective well-being and aspirations of the person to change]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2013. Vol. 4. URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2013/4/Yaremchuk.phtml (Accessed: 10.08.2020). (In Russ.).

24.    Yaremtchuk S.V., Novgorodova E.F. Samorazvitie i sub”ektivnoe blagopoluchie sovremennoi molodezhi [Self-development and subjective well-being of modern youth]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2015. 142 p. DOI:10.12737/7523. (In Russ.).

25.    Yaremtchuk S.V., Sityaeva S.M., Makhova I.Yu. Sub”ektivnoe blagopoluchie i emotsional’nye perezhivaniya v kontekste adaptatsii lichnosti k dlitel’noi ekstremal’noi situatsii [Adaptation to emergency situation: emotions and subjective well-being]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Siberian journal of psychology, 2016. Vol. 60, pp. 77—92. DOI:10.17223/17267080/60/6. (In Russ.).

26.    Cummins R.A. et al. Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 20.1 — The Wellbeing of Australians — The Effects of Fires in Victoria and Floods in Queensland. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, 2009. 42 р.

27.    Carnevale P.J.D., Isen A.M. The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986. Vol. 37, pр. 1—13. DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5

28.    Clement U., Schonnesson N.L. Subjective HIV attribution theories, coping, and psychological functioning among homosexual men with HIV. AIDS Care, 1998. Vol. 10(3), pp. 355—363. DOI:10.1080/713612416

29.    Rossi R. et al. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. medRxiv, 2020. DOI:10.1101/2020.04.09.20057802

30.    Cummins R.A. On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 1995. Vol. 2, pp. 179—200. DOI:10.1007/BF01079026

31.    Bezerra A.C.V. et al. Factors associated with people’s behavior in social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 2020. Vol. 25, pр. 2411—2421. DOI:10.1590/1413- 81232020256.1.10792020

32.    King L.A., Richards J.H., Stemmerich E. Daily Goals, Life Goals, and Worst Fears: Means, Ends, and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 1998. Vol. 66(5), pp. 713—744. DOI:10.1111/1467-6494.00030

33.    Rӧhr S. et al. Psychosocial Impact of Quarantine Measures During Serious Coronavirus Outbreaks: A Rapid Review. Psychiatrische Praxis, 2020. Vol. 47(4), pр. 179—189. DOI:10.1055/a-1159-5562

34.    Rajkumar R.Ph. COVID-19 and Mental Health: A Review of the Existing Literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 2020. Vol. 52. DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066

35.    Liang L. et al. The Effect of COVID-19 on Youth Mental Health. Psychiatric Quarterly, 2020. Vol. 91(3), pp. 841—852. DOI:10.1007/s11126-020-09744-3

36.    Brooks S.K. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 2020. Vol. 395(10227), pр. 912—920. DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8

37.    Xiang Y.-T. et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2020. Vol. 7(3), pр. 228—229. DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8

 

 
About PsyJournals.ru

© 2007–2021 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved

PsyJournals.ru in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at facebook Psyjournals at Twitter Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????