Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice Manuscript SubmissionAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us

  Previous issue (2016. Vol. 14, no. 1)

Tätigkeitstheorie: E-Journal for Activity Theoretical Research in Germany

Publisher: Georg Rückriem & Hartmut Giest

ISSN: 2191-6667

Published since 2010 till 2019

Published quarterly

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Digital Media as a Means of Developing Reflection in Students with Disabilities: Cultural-Historical Perspective 835


Rubtsova O.V.
PhD in Psychology, Head of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research of Contemporary Childhood, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia

Ulanova N.S.

A multidisciplinary research project “Understanding Digital Media” was launched in Moscow State University of Psychology and Education in 2011. The project aims at investigating the influence that digital technologies exert on various intra-psychological aspects of development – particularly on the formation of higher mental processes. The research is based on the fundamental idea of the cultural-historical theory (L.S. Vygotsky, A.N. Leontev, A.R. Luria) that demonstrates the crucial difference between tools and signs in human activity. In the research digital media are perceived as cultural signs, oriented towards higher psychological functions and mental processes. The article focuses on a longitudinal case-study undertaken with a disabled student of the IT Department. The goal of the study consists in investigating the influence of digital technologies on the reflection of the student while he is working on his graduation project – shooting a documentary about his love story.

Keywords: cultural tools and signs mediating , mediated activity reflection , disability drama, reflexive communication

For Reference

  1. Alper, M. (2012): Promoting emerging new media literacies among young children with blindness and visual impairments. Digital Culture & Education, 4, 3, 243-256. Buckingham, D. (2004): The media literacy of children and young people. London: Centre for the Study of Children Youth and Media, Institute of Education, University of London.
  2. Burne, B.; Knafelc, V.; Melonis, M.; Heyn, P.C. (2011): The use and application of assistive technology to promote literacy in early childhood: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 207-213.
  3. Christensen, C.M.; Johnson, C.W.; Horn, M.B. (2008): Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York. Cope, B.; Kalantzis, M. (2009): Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An Internation­al Journal, 4, 164-195.
  4. Floyd, K.K.; Canter, L.L.S.; Jeffs, T.; Judge, S.A. (2008): Assistive technology and emergent literacy for preschoolers: A literature review. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5, 92-102. URL: [20.08.2014].
  5. Hartz, D. (2000): Literacy leaps as blind students embrace technology. The English Journal, 90, 2, 52-59. Heldberg, J.G. (2011): Towards a disruptive pedagogy: Changing classroom practice with technologies and digital content. Educational Media International, 48, 1, 1-16. Jenkins, H.; Purushotma, R.; Clinton, K.; Weigel, M.; Robison, A.J. (2006): Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago. Jenkins, H. (2008): Media literacy: Who needs it? In: Willoughby, T.; Wood, R. (Eds.), Children's learning in a digital world. Oxford, 16-39. Kontopodis, M. (2012): Neoliberalism, pedagogy and human development: Exploring time, mediation and collectivity in contemporary schools. New York. Kress, G. (2010): Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London. Leontiev, A.N. (1978): Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Hillsdale.
  6. Rubtsov, V.V. (1991): Learning in children: Organization and development of cooperative actions. New York.
  7. Veresov, N.N. (2010): Introducing cultural historical theory: main concepts and principles of genetic research methodology. Cultural-historical psychology, 4, 83-90.
  8. Verlager, A.K. (2009): Literacy as process: The multiple literacies of blind readers. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 55, (1 & 2). URL:­issues/2-cultural-diversity-v55-n1a2/23-literacy-as-process-the-multiple-literacies-of-blind-readers [Date of access: 20.08.2014].
  9. Vygotsky, L.S. (1982): Sobranie sochinenii, Tom vtoroi, Problemy obshchei psikhologii [Collected works, Vol. 2: Problems of general psychology]. Moscow.
  10. Vygotsky, L.S. (1982а): Sobranie sochinenii, Tom tretii. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collected works, Vol.
  11. 3: Problems in the development of mind]. Moscow. Vygotsky, L.S. (1984): Sobranie sochinenii, Tom chetvertyi: Detskaya psikhilogii [Collected works, Vol. 4: Child psychology]. Moscow. Vygotsky, L.S. (1984a): Sobranie sochinenii, Tom shestoi: Nauchnoe nasledstvo [Collected works, Vol. 6: Scientific legacy]. Moscow. Vygotsky L.S (1997): Collected works. The History of the development of higher mental functions. New York. Westby, C. (2010): Multiliteracies: The changing world of communication. Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 1, 64-71.
  12. World Health Organization (2001): Agenda item 13.9: International classification of functioning, disabil­ity, and health. Resolution of the Fifty-Fourth World Health Assembly.

© 2007–2022 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????