Gerotranscendence: Psychological Content and Theoretical Models

This paper considers the psychological content of gerotranscendence theory by L.Tornstam. Aging is a complex and multilevel process. The present paper examines the paradigm of the biopsychosocial model that encompasses the biological, psychological and social level, and psychological characteristics are seen as possible moderators of both biological and social levels. Gerotranscendence theory is a systemic model of optimal aging that includes a set of transitions taking place at the level of the personality, society and cosmos. This model offers an explanation for the specifics of psychological reflection of realm and interaction with the world in aging. This paper suggests predictors, factors and possible outcomes of the gerotranscendence changes on most general characteristics of one’s functioning such as psychological well-being and health. In the paper we hypothesize two alternative models of the formation of gerotranscendence: normative and qualitative. We describe possible triggers for its formation, and show that gerotranscendence can be seen as obligatory formation of aging or as a qualitative change.

Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Osnovy psikhogerontologii [Basics of psychogerontology]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University, 2016. 77 p. (In Russian)

Carstensen L., Pasupathi M., Mayr U., Nesselroade J. Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, vol. 79, no. 4, рр. 644–655.

Strizhitskaya O. Sovremennye i klassicheskie issledovaniia stareniia [Modern and classic studies in psychology of aging]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2014. 56 p. (In Russian)

Aleksandrova M.D. Problemy sotsial’noi i psikhologicheskoi gerontologii [Problems of social and psychological gerontology]. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1974. 135 p. (In Russian)

Tornstam L. Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 1997, vol. 11, issue 2, рр. 143–154.

Tornstam L. Gerotranscendence. A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging. New York, Springer Publ., 2005. 213 р.

Tornstam L. Maturing Into Gerotranscendence. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 2011, vol. 43, no. 2, рр. 166–180.

Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Samootnoshenie i vremennaia transspektiva lichnosti v period pozdnei vzroslosti. Diss. kand. psihol. nauk [Self-attitude and Temporal Personality Transspective in Midlife. Thesis of PhD]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 221 p. (In Russian)

Rowe J.W., Khan R.L. Human aging: usual and successful. Science, 1987, vol. 237, no. 4811, pp. 143–149.

Freund A., Nikitin J., Ritter J. Psychological Consequences of Longevity. Human Development, 2009, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–37.

Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Praktikum po psihogerontologii [Psychogerontology practicum]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2012. 60 р. (In Russian)

Erikson E. Detstvo i obshchestvo. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Childhood and Society. 2nd ed. Revised. and ext]. Transl. from English. St. Petersburg, Lenato Publ., ACT Publ., Universitetskaia kniga Publ., 1996. 592 p. (In Russian)

Strizhitskaya O.Yu., Petrash M.D. Future time ambiguity types within younger and older adults. International Studies in Time Perspective. Coimbra, Portugal, Imprensa Da Universidade De Coimbra, 2013, рр. 65–70.

Rusk R.D., Waters L. A psycho-social system approach to well-being: Empirically deriving the Five Domains of Positive Functioning. Journal Of Positive Psychology, 2015, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–152.