B.G.Ananyev’s Forecasts and Modern Psychology Trends

127

Abstract

B.G.Ananyev’s forecasts about the future of psychology in connection with modern models of the development of psychological science and practice are discussed. The relevance of a primary number of forecasts of B.G.Ananyev is emphasized. Achievements, prospects, and problems of the movement of psychological knowledge of the development trajectories designated by it are shown. Regarding the discussion of the forecast about an increase in the status of psychology in the general system of scientific knowledge it is told about signs of its correctness, but also about risks of a breinization and technologization of a subject of psychology, threat of loss of its originality in cross-disciplinary researches. The forecast for the Вестник СПбГУ. Психология и педагогика. 2018. Т. 8. Вып. 3 269 creation of the new theory of psyche and consciousness, including the development of the system of “mental elements” is considered. Dialogical processes in the interaction of schools, approaches, paradigms in psychology are noted. At the same time difficulties in the creation of integrated mental models are specified. In the discussion of the forecast about the expansion of work of psychological services questions of an institutionalizing, substantial validity and ethical safety of psychological practice which solution is important for overcoming a critical spirit in society concerning psychological services are brought up. In this regard ambiguity of forecasts about the creation of a scientific basis of the design of the personality and about use of achievements of psychology for forecasting of future person is shown. Their embodiment demands from a psychological community of support on knowledge of regularities, reserves, and resources of human development for the offer to society of socially productive projects of personal development not compatible with social manipulation. The attention is drawn to the implementation of forecasts about the enrichment of developments in the field of intelligence: human and artificial. Along with the advantages of a technological intensification of development of science risks of technocratic reductionism in a knowledge of the person, overcoming the nature of “kiborgization” of the person are discussed. It is a specified discrepancy of the orientation of the development of natural intelligence, aggravation of intellectual stratification in the modern world.

General Information

Keywords: Boris Gerasimovich Ananyev, forecast, future of psychology, tendency, problem, risks, achievements

Journal rubric: Theory and Methodology of Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Shchukina M.A. B.G.Ananyev’s Forecasts and Modern Psychology Trends. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 258–270. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Golovei L.A., Zhuravlev A.L., Tarabrina N.V. B.G.Anan’ev i mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniia v psikhologii (k 110-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia) [B.G.Anan’ev and interdisciplinary researches in psychology (to 110-th anniversary)]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 5, pp. 108–117. (In Russian)

Loginova N.A. Antropologicheskaya psikhologiia Borisa Anan’eva [Anthropological psychology of Boris Ananyev]. Moscow, IP RAN Publ., 2016. 366 р. (In Russian)

Anan’ev B.G. Budushchee psikhologii [The future of psychology]. O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniia [On the problems of modern human consciousness]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, pp. 250–256. (In Russian)

Asmolov A.G. Budushchee psikhologii ili psihologiia bez budushchego: vzlet i nishcheta mezhdistsiplinarnosti [Psychology’s future or psychology without a future: the rise and poverty is a multidisciplinary approach]. Psikhologicheskaia gazeta [Psychological newspaper]. URL: https://psy.su/feed/6368/. (In Russian)

Programma: Vserossiiskii psikhologicheskii forum. S”ezd rossiiskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva [Program: All-Russian psychological forum. Congress of the Russian psychological society]. 5–7.10.2017. Rossiiskoe psihologicheskoe obshchestvo [Russian psychological society]. Available at: http://rpo. rf/congress/2017/doc/programm_forum_Kazan_2017.pdf. (In Russian)

Interv’iu s Filippom Zimbardo o budushchem social’noi psikhologii [The interview with Fhilip Zimbardo about the social psychology future]. Social’naia i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia [Social and economic psychology], 2017, no. 1, pp. 214–219. (In Russian)

Interv’iu s D.A. Leont’evym o budushchem social’noi psikhologii [Interview with D.A.Leontiev about the social psychology future]. Social’naia i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia [Social and economic psychology], 2017, no. 3, pp. 228–251. (In Russian)

Interv’iu s V.A.Klyucharevym o budushchem psikhologii [Interview with V.A.Klucharev about the psychology future]. Social’naia i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia [Social and economic psychology], 2017, no. 4, pp. 196–223. (In Russian)

Ancupov A.Ya., Kandybovich S.L. Problemy prognoza razvitiia psikhologii [Forecast problems of psychology development]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 4, pp. 109–114. (In Russian)

Zhalagina T.A., Korotkina E.D. Psikhologicheskaia nauka k kontsu tret’ego desiatiletiia XXI veka: strategii razvitiia [Psychological science to the end of the third decade, XXI century: development strategies]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 5, pp. 103–104. (In Russian)

Mazilov V.A. Psikhologiia: vzgliad v budushchee [Psychology: a view to the future]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 5, pp. 97–102. (In Russian)

Mironenko I.A. Ot prognoza — k forsaitu budushchego rossiiskoi psikhologii [From the forecast to a forsight of the future of russian psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 3, pp. 119–123. (In Russian)

Popov L.M., Nasibullov K.I., Ustin P.N. Problemy rossijskoj psihologii i puti ih resheniya [Problems and ways of their solution in russian psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 4, pp. 115–118. (In Russian)

Sergeeva A. S., Sergeev S.F. Psikhologicheskaia nauka na granitse s tekhnologicheskoi singuliarnost’iu [Psychology on the brink of technological singularity]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 3, pp. 124–128. (In Russian)

Chernyshev A. S., Sarychev S.V., Elizarov S.G., Lobkov YU.L., Bespalov D.V. O nekotorykh osnovaniiakh prognoza razvitiia psikhologicheskoi nauki i praktiki [On some bases for prognosis of psychological science And pr actice development]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 6, pp. 110–114. (In Russian)

Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A., Yurevich A.V. Prognoz razvitiia psikhologicheskoi nauki i praktiki k 2030 g. [The forcast of psychological science and practice development by 2030]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2016, no. 5, pp. 45–64. (In Russian)

Styopin V. S., Gorohov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofiia nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 1996. 399 p. (In Russian)

Bessonova Yu.V., Kubrak T.A., Nestik T.A., Barabanshchikova V.V. XXXIMezhdunarodnyi psikhologicheskii kongress [XXXI International Psychological Congress]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2017, no. 2, pp. 133–138. (In Russian)

Budushchee psikhologii biznesa. Forsait-sessiia «Psikhologiia biznesa—2024» Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [The future of business psychology. Foresight session “Psychology of business—2024” of Higher school of Economics]. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Available at: https://social. hse.ru/psy/psbus/news/113279395.html (accessed: 18.02.2018). (In Russian)

Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwella D. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. PNAS, 2015, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1036–1040.

Lambiotte R., Kosinski M. Tracking the Digital Footprints of Personality. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2014, vol. 102, no. 12, pp. 1934–1939.

Information About the Authors

M. A. Shchukina, Doctor of Psychology, Head of the Department of Psychology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Professor of the Department of General and Differential Psychology, St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-3548, e-mail: corr5@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 154
Previous month: 4
Current month: 2

Downloads

Total: 127
Previous month: 5
Current month: 6